Mapping the Research Landscape on Poaching: A Decadal Systematic Review

被引:10
|
作者
Lavadinovic, Vukan M. [1 ]
Islas, Camila A. [2 ]
Chatakonda, Murali Krishna [3 ]
Markovic, Nevena [4 ,5 ]
Mbiba, Monicah [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Belgrade, Fac Forestry, Belgrade, Serbia
[2] Int Inst Sustainabil, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[3] Amity Univ, Amity Inst Forestry & Wildlife, Noida, India
[4] CSIC, Inst Heritage Sci INCIPIT, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
[5] Univ Basque Country UPV EHU, Leioa, Spain
[6] Nelson Mandela Univ, Sustainabil Res Unit, George, South Africa
来源
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
poaching; wildlife; charismatic species; motives; drivers; Systematic review; PRISMA methodology; WILDLIFE CONSERVATION; NORTH-SOUTH; BIODIVERSITY; TRENDS; TRADE; MILITARIZATION; TANZANIA; WORLD;
D O I
10.3389/fevo.2021.630990
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Poaching is a widespread activity that affects wildlife management goals and undermines conservation efforts worldwide. Despite its complexity, poaching is still commonly addressed by researchers as a one-dimensional phenomenon. To deepen the scientific understanding of poaching, we conducted a systematic literature review in the Web of Science and Scopus databases for the last 10 years, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology. We found that most studies were carried out in Africa, although 43% of all articles on poaching were published by researchers from the United States and the United Kingdom. The most studied species are elephants (22%), rhinos (19%), wolves (9%), and bears (6%). Although this study identified a wide range of motives and drivers behind poaching activities, more than half of the analyzed articles do not attempt to provide a deeper understanding of this phenomenon. Its understanding of poaching usually does not go beyond the environmental impact of illegal hunting. Our study's potential limitations may relate to the focus on exclusively English-language articles and, among them, only those discussing mammal, bird, and reptile species. Our findings indicate that global scientific knowledge on poaching in the last 10 years is biased. There is an imbalance between the developed countries that mostly produce knowledge on poaching (usually from Northern America and Europe) and the developing countries commonly an object of interest. This bias is potentially challenging, as the global scientific knowledge on poaching comes from limited experience based on charismatic species and selective case studies. To overcome this gap and develop a deeper understanding of poaching, the scientific community needs to overcome this bias and address illegal hunting wherever it affects the environment and undermines conservation efforts.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Changing landscape of emergency management research: A systematic review with bibliometric analysis
    Oh, Namkyung
    Lee, Junghyae
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2020, 49
  • [42] Exploring the Landscape of Eco-Mapping in Health Services Research: A Comprehensive Review
    Saragosa, Marianne
    Singh, Hardeep
    Steele Gray, Carolyn
    Tang, Terence
    Orchanian-Cheff, Ani
    Nelson, Michelle L. A.
    HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 2024, 2024
  • [43] Mapping the Research Landscape: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Review of Global Warming and Human Health
    Zheng, Qingyong
    Xu, Jianguo
    Liu, Ming
    Ji, Kexin
    Zhang, Yu
    Wu, Songlin
    Li, Tengfei
    Yuan, Kaisen
    Ma, Zhichao
    Ma, Zijian
    Tian, Jinhui
    Li, Jiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2025,
  • [44] Mapping the Landscape of the Digital Workflow of Esthetic Veneers from Design to Cementation: A Systematic Review
    Ahmed, Walaa Magdy
    Azhari, Amr Ahmed
    Sedayo, Lamer
    Alhaid, Alanod
    Alhandar, Reem
    Almalki, Amirah
    Jahlan, Aishah
    Almutairi, Afnan
    Kheder, Waad
    DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2024, 12 (02)
  • [45] Mapping the current landscape of citizen-driven environmental monitoring: a systematic literature review
    Rathnayake, Chaminda
    Joshi, Somya
    Cerratto-Pargman, Teresa
    SUSTAINABILITY-SCIENCE PRACTICE AND POLICY, 2020, 16 (01): : 326 - 334
  • [46] Sociotechnical Privacy Mapping the Research Landscape
    Ochs, Carsten
    Ilyes, Petra
    TECNOSCIENZA-ITALIAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY STUDIES, 2013, 4 (02): : 73 - 91
  • [47] A Retro Perspective on Blended/Hybrid Learning: Systematic Review, Mapping and Visualization of the Scholarly Landscape
    Bozkurt, Aras
    JOURNAL OF INTERACTIVE MEDIA IN EDUCATION, 2022, (01):
  • [48] Mapping the Research Landscape of Agricultural Sciences
    Devyatkin, Dmitry
    Nechaeva, Elena
    Suvorov, Roman
    Tikhomirov, Ilya
    FORESIGHT AND STI GOVERNANCE, 2018, 12 (01) : 69 - 78
  • [49] Mapping the research landscape of blockchain and crowdfunding
    Rejeb, Abderahman
    Rejeb, Karim
    Appolloni, Andrea
    Zailani, Suhaiza
    Iranmanesh, Mohammad
    FINANCIAL INNOVATION, 2025, 11 (01)
  • [50] Mapping SME productivity research: a systematic review of empirical evidence and future research agenda
    Beldina Owalla
    Cristian Gherhes
    Tim Vorley
    Chay Brooks
    Small Business Economics, 2022, 58 : 1285 - 1307