Mapping the Research Landscape on Poaching: A Decadal Systematic Review

被引:10
|
作者
Lavadinovic, Vukan M. [1 ]
Islas, Camila A. [2 ]
Chatakonda, Murali Krishna [3 ]
Markovic, Nevena [4 ,5 ]
Mbiba, Monicah [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Belgrade, Fac Forestry, Belgrade, Serbia
[2] Int Inst Sustainabil, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[3] Amity Univ, Amity Inst Forestry & Wildlife, Noida, India
[4] CSIC, Inst Heritage Sci INCIPIT, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
[5] Univ Basque Country UPV EHU, Leioa, Spain
[6] Nelson Mandela Univ, Sustainabil Res Unit, George, South Africa
来源
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
poaching; wildlife; charismatic species; motives; drivers; Systematic review; PRISMA methodology; WILDLIFE CONSERVATION; NORTH-SOUTH; BIODIVERSITY; TRENDS; TRADE; MILITARIZATION; TANZANIA; WORLD;
D O I
10.3389/fevo.2021.630990
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Poaching is a widespread activity that affects wildlife management goals and undermines conservation efforts worldwide. Despite its complexity, poaching is still commonly addressed by researchers as a one-dimensional phenomenon. To deepen the scientific understanding of poaching, we conducted a systematic literature review in the Web of Science and Scopus databases for the last 10 years, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology. We found that most studies were carried out in Africa, although 43% of all articles on poaching were published by researchers from the United States and the United Kingdom. The most studied species are elephants (22%), rhinos (19%), wolves (9%), and bears (6%). Although this study identified a wide range of motives and drivers behind poaching activities, more than half of the analyzed articles do not attempt to provide a deeper understanding of this phenomenon. Its understanding of poaching usually does not go beyond the environmental impact of illegal hunting. Our study's potential limitations may relate to the focus on exclusively English-language articles and, among them, only those discussing mammal, bird, and reptile species. Our findings indicate that global scientific knowledge on poaching in the last 10 years is biased. There is an imbalance between the developed countries that mostly produce knowledge on poaching (usually from Northern America and Europe) and the developing countries commonly an object of interest. This bias is potentially challenging, as the global scientific knowledge on poaching comes from limited experience based on charismatic species and selective case studies. To overcome this gap and develop a deeper understanding of poaching, the scientific community needs to overcome this bias and address illegal hunting wherever it affects the environment and undermines conservation efforts.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mapping the Scholarship of Fake News Research: A Systematic Review
    Abu Arqoub, Omar
    Elega, Adeola Abdulateef
    Efe ozad, Bahire
    Dwikat, Hanadi
    Oloyede, Felix Adedamola
    JOURNALISM PRACTICE, 2022, 16 (01) : 56 - 86
  • [22] Internalized Homonegativity: A Systematic Mapping Review of Empirical Research
    Berg, Rigmor C.
    Munthe-Kaas, Heather M.
    Ross, Michael W.
    JOURNAL OF HOMOSEXUALITY, 2016, 63 (04) : 541 - 558
  • [23] Generative AI in education and research: A systematic mapping review
    Yusuf, Abdullahi
    Pervin, Nasrin
    Roman-Gonzalez, Marcos
    Noor, Norah Md
    REVIEW OF EDUCATION, 2024, 12 (02):
  • [24] Navigating the landscape of sustainable entrepreneurship research: a systematic literature review
    Abbas, Muhammad Hassan
    Bulut, Mehmet
    DISCOVER SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 5 (01):
  • [25] Research Landscape of Patterns and Architectures for IoT Security: A Systematic Review
    Rajmohan, Tanusan
    Nguyen, Phu H.
    Ferry, Nicolas
    2020 46TH EUROMICRO CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND ADVANCED APPLICATIONS (SEAA 2020), 2020, : 463 - 470
  • [26] The research landscape of school-based sexuality education Systematic mapping of the literature
    Roien, Line Anne
    Graugaard, Christian
    Simovska, Venka
    HEALTH EDUCATION, 2018, 118 (02) : 159 - 170
  • [27] Mapping the Landscape and Structure of Research on Education for Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Review
    Hallinger, Philip
    Vien-Thong Nguyen
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (05)
  • [28] Mapping the landscape of cross-group friendship research: a bibliometric review
    Srivastava, Prakhar
    Bano, Samina
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2025,
  • [29] Mapping the Landscape of Autism Research: A Scientometric Review (2011-2023)
    Mahajan, Pratibha
    Patil, Deven
    Nair, Nidhi
    Musmade, Nishant
    Apte, Preet
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2025, 85 (01)
  • [30] Mapping the biomedical research landscape
    Karen Birmingham
    Nature Medicine, 1998, 4 : 877 - 877