Mapping the Research Landscape on Poaching: A Decadal Systematic Review

被引:10
|
作者
Lavadinovic, Vukan M. [1 ]
Islas, Camila A. [2 ]
Chatakonda, Murali Krishna [3 ]
Markovic, Nevena [4 ,5 ]
Mbiba, Monicah [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Belgrade, Fac Forestry, Belgrade, Serbia
[2] Int Inst Sustainabil, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[3] Amity Univ, Amity Inst Forestry & Wildlife, Noida, India
[4] CSIC, Inst Heritage Sci INCIPIT, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
[5] Univ Basque Country UPV EHU, Leioa, Spain
[6] Nelson Mandela Univ, Sustainabil Res Unit, George, South Africa
来源
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
poaching; wildlife; charismatic species; motives; drivers; Systematic review; PRISMA methodology; WILDLIFE CONSERVATION; NORTH-SOUTH; BIODIVERSITY; TRENDS; TRADE; MILITARIZATION; TANZANIA; WORLD;
D O I
10.3389/fevo.2021.630990
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Poaching is a widespread activity that affects wildlife management goals and undermines conservation efforts worldwide. Despite its complexity, poaching is still commonly addressed by researchers as a one-dimensional phenomenon. To deepen the scientific understanding of poaching, we conducted a systematic literature review in the Web of Science and Scopus databases for the last 10 years, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology. We found that most studies were carried out in Africa, although 43% of all articles on poaching were published by researchers from the United States and the United Kingdom. The most studied species are elephants (22%), rhinos (19%), wolves (9%), and bears (6%). Although this study identified a wide range of motives and drivers behind poaching activities, more than half of the analyzed articles do not attempt to provide a deeper understanding of this phenomenon. Its understanding of poaching usually does not go beyond the environmental impact of illegal hunting. Our study's potential limitations may relate to the focus on exclusively English-language articles and, among them, only those discussing mammal, bird, and reptile species. Our findings indicate that global scientific knowledge on poaching in the last 10 years is biased. There is an imbalance between the developed countries that mostly produce knowledge on poaching (usually from Northern America and Europe) and the developing countries commonly an object of interest. This bias is potentially challenging, as the global scientific knowledge on poaching comes from limited experience based on charismatic species and selective case studies. To overcome this gap and develop a deeper understanding of poaching, the scientific community needs to overcome this bias and address illegal hunting wherever it affects the environment and undermines conservation efforts.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mapping the Landscape of ESG Strategies: A Bibliometric Review and Recommendations for Future Research
    Au, Alan Kai Ming
    Yang, Yi-Fan
    Wang, Huan
    Chen, Rui-Hong
    Zheng, Leven J.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (24)
  • [32] Mapping the biomedical research landscape
    Birmingham, K
    NATURE MEDICINE, 1998, 4 (08) : 877 - 877
  • [33] Prenatal alcohol prevention in the UK: mapping the landscape through systematic collaborative review
    McQuire, Cheryl
    Zuccolo, Luisa
    Frennesson, Felicia
    Butcher, Sandra
    Carel, Havi
    Cook, Penny
    Dvorak, Tadeas
    Gilham, Ellie
    Hurt, Lisa
    Langford, Rebecca
    Misell, Andrew
    Mukherjee, Raja
    Porter, Alice
    Susoy, Oliver
    Taylor-Robinson, David
    Troy, David
    de Vocht, Frank
    LANCET, 2022, 400 : 64 - 64
  • [34] Systematic Mapping and Review of Landscape Fire Smoke (LFS) Exposure Impacts on Insects
    Liu, Yanan
    Francis, Robert A.
    Wooster, Martin J.
    Grosvenor, Mark J.
    Yan, Su
    Roberts, Gareth
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2022, 51 (05) : 871 - 884
  • [35] Mapping the research on language teacher emotion: A systematic literature review
    Han, Jiying
    Jin, Lei
    Yin, Hongbiao
    SYSTEM, 2023, 118
  • [36] Investigating school ground vegetation research: A systematic mapping review
    Ignell, Sanna
    Wistrom, Bjorn
    Levinsson, Anna
    Jansson, Marit
    URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2024, 101
  • [37] Gamified Project-Based Learning: A Systematic Review of the Research Landscape
    Huang, Wendan
    Li, Xiuhan
    Shang, Junjie
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (02)
  • [38] The Landscape of US and Global Rare Tumor Research Programs: A Systematic Review
    Vivelo, Christina
    Reilly, Karlyne M.
    Widemann, Brigitte C.
    Wedekind, Mary Frances
    Painter, Corrie
    O'Neill, Allison F.
    Mueller, Sabine
    Elemento, Olivier
    Gross, Andrea M.
    Sandler, Abby B.
    ONCOLOGIST, 2024, 29 (02): : 106 - 116
  • [39] Conceptualizing the landscape of digital health entrepreneurship: a systematic review and research agenda
    Weimar, Sascha Noel
    Martjan, Rahel Sophie
    Terzidis, Orestis
    MANAGEMENT REVIEW QUARTERLY, 2024,
  • [40] Research trends on integrative landscape assessment using indicators - A systematic review
    Medeiros, Ana
    Fernandes, Claudia
    Goncalves, Joao F.
    Farinha-Marques, Paulo
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 129 (129)