Mapping the Research Landscape on Poaching: A Decadal Systematic Review

被引:10
|
作者
Lavadinovic, Vukan M. [1 ]
Islas, Camila A. [2 ]
Chatakonda, Murali Krishna [3 ]
Markovic, Nevena [4 ,5 ]
Mbiba, Monicah [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Belgrade, Fac Forestry, Belgrade, Serbia
[2] Int Inst Sustainabil, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[3] Amity Univ, Amity Inst Forestry & Wildlife, Noida, India
[4] CSIC, Inst Heritage Sci INCIPIT, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
[5] Univ Basque Country UPV EHU, Leioa, Spain
[6] Nelson Mandela Univ, Sustainabil Res Unit, George, South Africa
来源
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
poaching; wildlife; charismatic species; motives; drivers; Systematic review; PRISMA methodology; WILDLIFE CONSERVATION; NORTH-SOUTH; BIODIVERSITY; TRENDS; TRADE; MILITARIZATION; TANZANIA; WORLD;
D O I
10.3389/fevo.2021.630990
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Poaching is a widespread activity that affects wildlife management goals and undermines conservation efforts worldwide. Despite its complexity, poaching is still commonly addressed by researchers as a one-dimensional phenomenon. To deepen the scientific understanding of poaching, we conducted a systematic literature review in the Web of Science and Scopus databases for the last 10 years, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology. We found that most studies were carried out in Africa, although 43% of all articles on poaching were published by researchers from the United States and the United Kingdom. The most studied species are elephants (22%), rhinos (19%), wolves (9%), and bears (6%). Although this study identified a wide range of motives and drivers behind poaching activities, more than half of the analyzed articles do not attempt to provide a deeper understanding of this phenomenon. Its understanding of poaching usually does not go beyond the environmental impact of illegal hunting. Our study's potential limitations may relate to the focus on exclusively English-language articles and, among them, only those discussing mammal, bird, and reptile species. Our findings indicate that global scientific knowledge on poaching in the last 10 years is biased. There is an imbalance between the developed countries that mostly produce knowledge on poaching (usually from Northern America and Europe) and the developing countries commonly an object of interest. This bias is potentially challenging, as the global scientific knowledge on poaching comes from limited experience based on charismatic species and selective case studies. To overcome this gap and develop a deeper understanding of poaching, the scientific community needs to overcome this bias and address illegal hunting wherever it affects the environment and undermines conservation efforts.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mapping the Landscape of Global Anticancer Organometallics Research: A Systematic Review
    Rehman, Tanzeel Ur
    Al Naam, Yaser A.
    Zahid, Misbah
    Algethami, Jari S.
    MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2024,
  • [2] Mapping the deepfake landscape for innovation: A multidisciplinary systematic review and future research agenda
    Whittaker, Lucas
    Mulcahy, Rory
    Letheren, Kate
    Kietzmann, Jan
    Russell-Bennett, Rebekah
    TECHNOVATION, 2023, 125
  • [3] Mapping the service recovery research landscape: A bibliometric-based systematic review
    Mir, Mahmood
    Ashraf, Rohail
    Syed, Tahir Abbas
    Ali, Sara
    Nawaz, Raheel
    PSYCHOLOGY & MARKETING, 2023, 40 (10) : 2060 - 2087
  • [4] Mapping the Landscape of SLAM Research: A Review
    Gaia, Jeremias
    Orosco, Eugenio
    Rossomando, Francisco
    Soria, Carlos
    IEEE LATIN AMERICA TRANSACTIONS, 2023, 21 (12) : 1313 - 1336
  • [5] Methods for landscape characterisation and mapping: A systematic review
    Simensen, Trond
    Halvorsen, Rune
    Erikstad, Lars
    LAND USE POLICY, 2018, 75 : 557 - 569
  • [6] Mapping the landscape of oral cancer research trends: a systematic scientometric review of global efforts
    Yumnam, Gyanajeet
    Devi, Rajkumari Sofia
    Singh, Charoibam Ibohal
    ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY-HEIDELBERG, 2024, 28 (03): : 1077 - 1093
  • [7] Mapping the maternal health research landscape in Nunavut: A systematic search & critical review of methodology
    Brubacher, Laura Jane
    Dewey, Cate E.
    Cunsolo, Ashlee
    Humphries, Sally
    Akearok, Gwen K. Healey
    Gong, Crystal
    Harper, Sherilee L.
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2020, 262
  • [8] Mapping the Landscape of Behavioral Theories: Systematic Literature Review
    Kwon, Heeseo Rain
    Silva, Elisabete A.
    JOURNAL OF PLANNING LITERATURE, 2020, 35 (02) : 161 - 179
  • [9] Mapping the Research Landscape of Strategic Human Resource Management in Nonprofit Organizations: A Systematic Review and Avenues for Future Research
    Baluch, Alina M.
    Ridder, Hans-Gerd
    NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, 2021, 50 (03) : 598 - 625
  • [10] Mapping the Research Landscape for the Motorcycle Market Policies: Sustainability as a Trend-A Systematic Literature Review
    Cadavid, Lorena
    Salazar-Serna, Kathleen
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (19)