On the benefits of allowing CEOs to time their stock option exercises

被引:9
|
作者
Laux, Volker [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA
来源
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS | 2010年 / 41卷 / 01期
关键词
INFORMATION; EARNINGS; MARKET; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1111/j.1756-2171.2009.00092.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article examines the costs and benefits of permitting executives to use inside information to time their stock option exercises. Whereas prior research has focused on the negative effects of timing discretion, I show that such discretion can have beneficial incentive effects in that it leads to improved project abandonment decisions. This result follows because at-the-money options used to induce managerial effort tilt the CEO's preferences toward project continuation. When the CEO is free to unload stock options at will, he will do so exactly in those states where the continuation bias is most detrimental (i.e., in the event of bad news), making the CEO willing to abandon the project.
引用
收藏
页码:118 / 138
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Stock option bill passes
    不详
    [J]. R&D MAGAZINE, 2004, 46 (08): : 32 - 32
  • [42] Stock Option Backdating Bedlam
    Ciesielski, Jack T.
    Weirich, Thomas R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2007, 18 (03): : 11 - 20
  • [43] The option to repurchase stock.
    Ikenberry, D
    Vermaelen, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1996, 51 (03): : 1050 - 1050
  • [44] STOCK OPTION PLANS IN TRANSITION
    ROTHSCHI.VH
    SALWEN, JB
    [J]. CONFERENCE BOARD RECORD, 1973, 10 (06): : 17 - 20
  • [45] THE SWING OPTION ON THE STOCK MARKET
    Dahlgren, Martin
    Korn, Ralf
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL AND APPLIED FINANCE, 2005, 8 (01) : 123 - 139
  • [46] STOCK OPTION DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
    ELLIG, BR
    [J]. COMPENSATION REVIEW, 1983, 15 (01): : 13 - 24
  • [47] VALUATION OF STOCK OPTION CONTRACTS
    WEYGANDT, JJ
    [J]. ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 1977, 52 (01): : 40 - 51
  • [48] STOCK OPTION PLANS FOR EXECUTIVES
    Garfinkle, Eugene
    [J]. CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 1953, 41 (03) : 535 - 545
  • [49] SUCCESSORS TO QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION
    CAREY, JF
    [J]. HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, 1978, 56 (01) : 140 - 146
  • [50] STOCK OPTION DISCLOSURES ARE INADEQUATE
    KISTLER, LH
    [J]. ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 1967, 42 (04): : 758 - 766