Improving the Contrast-to-Noise Ratio by Averaging in Scintillation Detectors

被引:0
|
作者
Vopalensky, Michal [1 ]
Kumpoa, Ivana [1 ]
Vavrik, Daniel [2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Excellence Tele, Inst Theoret & Appl Mech, Batelovska 486, Tele 58856, Czech Republic
[2] Ctr Excellence Tele, Inst Theoret & Appl Mech, Batelovska 485, Tele 58856, Czech Republic
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
From the point of view of the image quality, the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) is a crucial parameter. In case of the scintillation detectors, which are widely used in X-ray radiography and computed tomography, CNR is determined by the static image noise caused mainly by the non-uniformity of the response of particular pixels, and by the stochastic noise, composed of the inherent noise of the detector and the X-ray beam fluctuation. The static noise can be suppressed using appropriate correction methods, such as the flat field correction. The stochastic component of noise can be lowered by averaging of more images of the same scene, but this approach leads to an increased time of the tomography, which can be an undesirable effect. This paper shows a method that separates the stochastic noise component from the static noise component and thus allows to determine the maximum reachable CNR in the given case and the minimum number of images to he averaged for reaching required CNR. The method is intended to be used for optimized setting of the detector and X-ray source parameters in tomography to obtain the best possible results in a reasonable time.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of both image resolution and contrast-to-noise ratio in scanning electron microscopy
    Ishitani, Tohru
    Sato, Mitsugu
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRON MICROSCOPY, 2007, 56 (04) : 145 - 151
  • [32] Influence of detector response speed on the contrast-to-noise ratio of reflective ghost imaging
    Li, Hong-Guo
    Zhang, De-Jian
    Zhao, Qiu-Li
    Wang, Sen
    Wang, Hai-Bo
    Xiong, Jun
    OPTICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2015, 355 : 558 - 561
  • [33] Contrast-to-noise ratio and histogram analysis of modified digital radiography image of pet
    Susilo
    Masturi
    Susanti, R.
    Yulianti, Ian
    Fatimah, Q.
    UNNES PHYSICS INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM 2018 (UPIS2018), 2019, 1170
  • [34] THE VARIATION OF SIGNAL, CONTRAST AND CONTRAST-TO-NOISE RATIO IN NUCLEAR-MAGNETIC-RESONANCE FAST IMAGING SEQUENCES
    LEACH, MO
    HIND, AJ
    GOWLAND, PA
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1987, 60 (716): : 788 - 788
  • [35] Method of measuring contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in nonuniform image area in digital radiography
    Mori, Masaki
    Imai, Kuniharu
    Ikeda, Mitsuru
    Iida, Youko
    Ito, Fukiko
    Yoneda, Kazuo
    Enchi, Yukihiro
    ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATIONS IN JAPAN, 2013, 96 (07) : 32 - 41
  • [36] Contrast-to-Noise Ratio Improvement in Volume-of-Interest Cone Beam Breast CT
    Shen, Youtao
    Liu, Xinming
    Lai, Chao-Jen
    Zhong, Yuncheng
    Yi, Ying
    You, Zhicheng
    Wang, Tianpeng
    Shaw, Chris C.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2012: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2012, 8313
  • [37] Increasing the Contrast-to-Noise Ratio of MRI Signals for Regional Assessment of Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulation
    Jara, Jose L.
    Saeed, Nazia P.
    Panerai, Ronney B.
    Robinson, Thompson G.
    INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE & NEUROMONITORING XVI, 2018, 126 : 153 - 157
  • [38] Thickness of molybdenum filter and squared contrast-to-noise ratio per dose for digital mammography
    Nishino, TK
    Wu, XZ
    Johnson, RF
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 185 (04) : 960 - 963
  • [39] Automated region detection based on the contrast-to-noise ratio in near-infrared tomography
    Song, XM
    Pogue, BW
    Jiang, SD
    Doyley, MM
    Dehghani, H
    Tosteson, TD
    Paulsen, KD
    APPLIED OPTICS, 2004, 43 (05) : 1053 - 1062
  • [40] Contrast-to-Noise Ratio Optimization in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: Validation in a Swine Model
    Hubbard, Logan
    Malkasian, Shant
    Zhao, Yixiao
    Abbona, Pablo
    Molloi, Sabee
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2019, 26 (06) : E115 - E125