Overview of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for receptor positive breast cancer in post menopausal women

被引:1
|
作者
Paepke, S
Harbeck, N
Jacobs, VR
Schwarz-Boeger, U
von Steinburg, SP
Fischer, T
Diedrich, F
Blohmer, JU
Warm, M
Huober, J
Wolfs, C
Eiermann, W
Kiechle, M
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Frauenklin Rechts Isar, Leitender Oberarzt Diagnost & Operat Senol, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[2] Humboldt Univ, Frauenklin, Berlin, Germany
[3] Humboldt Univ, Charite, Brustzentrum, Berlin, Germany
[4] Univ Cologne, Frauenklin, Cologne, Germany
[5] Univ Tubingen, Frauenklin, Tubingen, Germany
[6] Frauenklin Rot Kreuz, Munich, Germany
关键词
breast cancer; neoadjuvant endocrine therapy; anastrozole; exemestane; letrozole; breast conserving therapy;
D O I
10.1055/s-2004-830391
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
For elderly women, great importance is increasingly being attached to the question of breast conservation. Current data confirms the concept of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy as an option in postmenopausal women to reduce the volume of locally advanced carcinomas and thereby increase the rate of breast conserving operations. Moreover, in vivo testing of the effectiveness of endocrine neoadjuvance is important for subsequent adjuvant therapy. Endocrine therapy is also particularly well tolerated. Current data are available, although to different degrees, both for tamoxifen and for all aromatase inhibitors. Initial neoadjuvant treatment studies with tamoxifen showed clinical response rates of 49 to 68% with a median reduction in tumour volume of 58%. Studies comparing adjuvant tamoxifen with primary tamoxifen treatment and subsequent surgery in the event of disease progression found no difference in total survival. For the aromatase inhibitors, results were variable overall: In the IMPACT study (Phase III) anastrozole, tamoxifen or the two drugs combined showed no difference with respect to response after 3 months (anastrozole 37.2%, tamoxifen 36.1%); an increased rate of breast conserving operations was achieved with anastrozole (45.2%) compared with tamoxifen (22.2%). Exemestane, at 88.6%, has a greater response than tamoxifen (57.2%) (Phase II) and letrozole shows a response of 55-92% compared with 36% for tamoxifen (Phase II and III). Extension of the neoadjuvant therapy phase with exemestane to 4-5 months improved the response, with further increases in the rates of complete remission based on clinical and pathological evidence and an increased rate of breast conservation of 45.2%; figures for letrozole at 6-8 months were 67.0%. Data on the long-term outcome are not yet available. Future studies are focusing on optimisation of the treatment period, the search for reliable predictive markers and improvement of the therapeutic index.
引用
收藏
页码:1290 / 1298
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Breast Cancer
    Chawla, Jane S.
    Ma, Cynthia X.
    Ellis, Matthew J.
    [J]. SURGICAL ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2010, 19 (03) : 627 - +
  • [22] Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer
    不详
    [J]. EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2004, 2 (09): : 60 - 61
  • [23] Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer
    Beresford, M. J.
    Ravichandran, D.
    Makris, A.
    [J]. CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2007, 33 (01) : 48 - 57
  • [24] Neoadjuvant Therapy for Older Patients with Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer: Comparison of Chemotherapy and Endocrine Approaches
    Miller, Krislyn N.
    Thomas, Samantha M.
    Rosenberger, Laura H.
    DiNome, Maggie L.
    DiLalla, Gayle
    Hwang, Shelley
    Plichta, Jennifer
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (SUPPL 2) : 374 - 374
  • [25] Biomarker Alteration after Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy or Chemotherapy in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer
    Long, Mengping
    You, Chong
    Song, Qianqian
    Hu, Lina X. J.
    Guo, Zhaorong
    Yao, Qian
    Hou, Wei
    Sun, Wei
    Liang, Baosheng
    Zhou, Xiao-Hua
    Liu, Yiqiang
    Hu, Taobo
    [J]. LIFE-BASEL, 2023, 13 (01):
  • [26] Neoadjuvant Chemo-Endocrine Therapy for Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Li, Zhen-Yu
    Dong, Ying-Li
    Cao, Xiao-Zhong
    Ren, Sha-Sha
    Zhang, Zhen
    Matsubara, Shigeki
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 50 (04):
  • [27] Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Endocrine Therapy for Older Patients with Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer: Comparison of Approaches
    Miller, Krislyn N.
    Thomas, Samantha M.
    Record, Sydney M.
    Rosenberger, Laura H.
    DiNome, Maggie L.
    DiLalla, Gayle
    Force, Jeremy M.
    Hwang, E. Shelley
    Plichta, Jennifer K.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (10) : 6141 - 6150
  • [28] Assessment of Pathologic Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Postmenopausal Women with Estrogen Receptor Positive Stage 2 or 3 Breast Cancer
    Tammaro, Y. R.
    Moses, G.
    Eastman, A.
    Peng, Y.
    Euhus, D.
    Leitch, A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 : S87 - S87
  • [29] Long-Term Outcome of Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy with Aromatase Inhibitors in Elderly Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer
    Antonino Grassadonia
    Marta Di Nicola
    Simona Grossi
    Paolo Noccioli
    Saveria Tavoletta
    Roberto Politi
    Domenico Angelucci
    Camilla Marinelli
    Marinella Zilli
    Giampiero Ausili Cefaro
    Nicola Tinari
    Michele De Tursi
    Laura Iezzi
    Pasquale Cioffi
    Stefano Iacobelli
    Clara Natoli
    Ettore Cianchetti
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2014, 21 : 1575 - 1582
  • [30] Long-Term Outcome of Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy with Aromatase Inhibitors in Elderly Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer
    Grassadonia, Antonino
    Di Nicola, Marta
    Grossi, Simona
    Noccioli, Paolo
    Tavoletta, Saveria
    Politi, Roberto
    Angelucci, Domenico
    Marinelli, Camilla
    Zilli, Marinella
    Cefaro, Giampiero Ausili
    Tinari, Nicola
    De Tursi, Michele
    Iezzi, Laura
    Cioffi, Pasquale
    Iacobelli, Stefano
    Natoli, Clara
    Cianchetti, Ettore
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 (05) : 1575 - 1582