The influence of patient centering on CT dose and image noise

被引:160
|
作者
Toth, Thomas
Ge, Zhanyu
Daly, Michael P.
机构
[1] GE Co, CT Syst Engn W 1140, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Electromagnet Lab, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1118/1.2748113
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Although x-ray intensity shaping filters (bowtie filters) have been used since the introduction of some of the earliest CT scanner models, the clinical implications on dose and noise are not well understood. To achieve the intended dose and noise advantage requires the patient to be centered in the scan field of view. In this study we explore the implications of patient centering in clinical practice. We scanned various size and shape phantoms on a GE LightSpeed VCT scanner using each available source filter with the phantom centers positioned at 0, 3, and 6 cm below the center of rotation (isocenter). Surface doses were measured along with image noise over a large image region. Regression models of surface dose and noise were generated as a function of phantom size and centering error. Methods were also developed to determine the amount of miscentering using a scout scan projection radiograph (SPR). These models were then used to retrospectively evaluate 273 adult body patients for clinical implications. When miscentered by 3 and 6 cm, the surface dose on a 32 cm CTDI phantom increased by 18% and 41% while image noise also increased by 6% and 22%. The retrospective analysis of adult body scout SPR scans shows that 46% of patients were miscentered in elevation by 20-60 mm with a mean position 23 mm below the center of rotation (isocenter). The analysis indicated a surface dose penalty of up to 140% with a mean dose penalty of 33% assuming that tube current is increased to compensate for the increased noise due to miscentering. Clinical image quality and dose efficiency can be improved on scanners with bowtie filters if care is exercised when positioning patients. Automatically providing patient specific centering and scan parameter selection information can help the technologist improve workflow, achieve more consistent image quality and reduce patient dose. (C) 2007 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:3093 / 3101
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Survey of patient dose and image quality factors for CT scanners in Victoria
    Boal, T.J.
    Hedt, J.C.
    Einsiedel, P.F.
    Australasian Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 1999, 22 (03): : 103 - 112
  • [32] The effect of decreasing mAs on image quality and patient dose in sinus CT
    Sohaib, SA
    Peppercorn, PD
    Horrocks, JA
    Keene, MH
    Kenyon, GS
    Reznek, RH
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2001, 74 (878): : 157 - 161
  • [33] Assessment of patient dose and image quality for cardiac CT with breast shields
    Midgley, S. M.
    Einsiedel, P. F.
    Langenberg, F.
    Lui, E. H.
    Heinze, S. B.
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2012, 151 (03) : 463 - 468
  • [34] The influence of CT image noise on proton range calculation in radiotherapy planning
    Chvetsov, Alexei V.
    Paige, Sandra L.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (06): : N141 - N149
  • [35] Defining CT Noise and Dose Reference Levels From Clinical Patient Populations
    Ria, F.
    Solomon, J.
    Wilson, J.
    Zhang, Y.
    Smith, T.
    Samei, E.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E134 - E135
  • [36] Assessment of patient dose and noise level of clinical CT images: automated measurements
    Anam, Choirul
    Budi, Wahyu Setia
    Adi, Kusworo
    Sutanto, Heri
    Haryanto, Freddy
    Ali, Mohd Hanafi
    Fujibuchi, Toshioh
    Dougherty, Geoff
    JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2019, 39 (03) : 783 - 793
  • [37] CT IMAGE DETAIL AND NOISE
    SPRAWLS, P
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 1992, 12 (05) : 1041 - 1046
  • [38] The Relationship of Image Noise and Organ Dose as a Function of Patient Size for Abdominal CT Exams at 5 Different Dose Levels When Tube Current Modulation Is Used
    Zhang, D.
    Khatonabadi, M.
    Cagnon, C.
    DeMarco, J.
    McNitt-Gray, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3925 - 3925
  • [39] Effect of reconstruction kernels and patient size on image noise in abdominal helical CT
    Stadler, A
    Ringl, HR
    Prokop, M
    RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213P : 453 - 453
  • [40] Variation in CT Number and Image Noise Uniformity According to Patient Positioning in MDCT
    Szczykutowicz, Timothy P.
    DuPlissis, Andrew
    Pickhardt, Perry J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 208 (05) : 1064 - 1072