An Iterative Response-Surface-Based Approach for Chance-Constrained AC Optimal Power Flow Considering Dependent Uncertainty

被引:13
|
作者
Xu, Yijun [1 ]
Korkali, Mert [2 ]
Mili, Lamine [1 ]
Valinejad, Jaber [1 ]
Chen, Tao [3 ]
Chen, Xiao [4 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Northern Virginia Ctr, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Falls Church, VA 22043 USA
[2] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Computat Engn Div, Livermore, CA 94550 USA
[3] Southeast Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[4] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Ctr Appl Sci Comp, Livermore, CA 94550 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国能源部;
关键词
Uncertainty; Computational modeling; Stochastic processes; Response surface methodology; Renewable energy sources; Reactive power; Iterative methods; AC optimal power flow; response surface; uncertainty; chance constraints; dependence; POLYNOMIAL CHAOS EXPANSION; DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1109/TSG.2021.3051088
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
A modern power system is characterized by a stochastic variation of the loads and an increasing penetration of renewable energy generation, which results in large uncertainties in its states. These uncertainties bring formidable challenges to the power system planning and operation process. To address these challenges, we propose a cost-effective, iterative response-surface-based approach for the chance-constrained AC optimal power-flow problem that aims to ensure the secure operation of the power systems considering dependent uncertainties. Starting from a stochastic-sampling-based framework, we first utilize the copula theory to simulate the dependence among multivariate uncertain inputs. Then, to reduce the prohibitive computational time required in the traditional Monte-Carlo method, we propose, instead of using the original complicated power-system model, to rely on a polynomial-chaos-based response surface. This response surface allows us to efficiently evaluate the time-consuming power-system model at arbitrary distributed sampled values with a negligible computational cost. This further enables us to efficiently conduct an online stochastic testing for the system states that not only screens out the statistical active constraints, but also assists in a better design of the tightened bounds without using any Gaussian or symmetric assumption. Finally, an iterative procedure is executed to fine-tune the optimal solution that better satisfies a predefined probability. The simulations conducted in multiple test systems demonstrate the excellent performance of the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页码:2696 / 2707
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Chance-Constrained AC Optimal Power Flow: A Polynomial Chaos Approach
    Muhlpfordt, Tillmann
    Roald, Line
    Hagenmeyer, Veit
    Faulwasser, Timm
    Misra, Sidhant
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2019, 34 (06) : 4806 - 4816
  • [2] Chance-Constrained AC Optimal Power Flow: Reformulations and Efficient Algorithms
    Roald, Line
    Andersson, Goran
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2018, 33 (03) : 2906 - 2918
  • [3] Chance-Constrained AC Optimal Power Flow for Distribution Systems With Renewables
    Anese, Emiliano Dall'
    Baker, Kyri
    Summers, Tyler
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2017, 32 (05) : 3427 - 3438
  • [4] Asymptotically tight conic approximations for chance-constrained AC optimal power flow
    Fathabad, Abolhassan Mohammadi
    Cheng, Jianqiang
    Pan, Kai
    Yang, Boshi
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2023, 305 (02) : 738 - 753
  • [5] Chance-constrained AC optimal power flow integrating HVDC lines and controllability
    Venzke, Andreas
    Halilbasic, Lejla
    Barre, Adelie
    Roald, Line
    Chatzivasileiadis, Spyros
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2020, 116
  • [6] Importance Sampling Approach to Chance-Constrained DC Optimal Power Flow
    Lukashevich, Aleksander
    Gorchakov, Vyacheslav
    Vorobev, Petr
    Deka, Deepjyoti
    Maximov, Yury
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL OF NETWORK SYSTEMS, 2024, 11 (02): : 928 - 937
  • [7] A generalized framework for chance-constrained optimal power flow
    Muehlpfordt, Tillmann
    Faulwasser, Timm
    Hagenmeyer, Veit
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE ENERGY GRIDS & NETWORKS, 2018, 16 : 231 - 242
  • [8] Chance-constrained optimal power flow based on a linearized network model
    Du, Xiao
    Lin, Xingyu
    Peng, Zhiyun
    Peng, Sui
    Tang, Junjie
    Li, Wenyuan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2021, 130
  • [9] Joint chance-constrained program based electric vehicles optimal dispatching strategy considering drivers' response uncertainty
    Zhang, Kaizhe
    Xu, Yinliang
    Sun, Hongbin
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2024, 356
  • [10] Optimal Load Ensemble Control in Chance-Constrained Optimal Power Flow
    Hassan, Ali
    Mieth, Robert
    Chertkov, Michael
    Deka, Deepjyoti
    Dvorkin, Yury
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2019, 10 (05) : 5186 - 5195