Unpacking PIAAC's cognitive skills measurements through engagement with Bloom's taxonomy

被引:3
|
作者
Boeren, Ellen [1 ,3 ]
Iniguez-Berrozpe, Tatiana [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow UK, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ Zarragoza ES, Zaragoza, Spain
[3] Univ Glasgow, Sch Educ, St Andrews Bldg,11 Eldon St, Glasgow G3 6NH, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
PIAAC; Literacy; Numeracy; Problem-solving; Proficiency levels; Bloom taxonomy; MATHEMATICS; EDUCATION; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101151
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The Programme for International Assessment of Adult Skills (PIAAC) surveys people between the ages of 16 and 65 and includes an assessment of cognitive skills (literacy, numeracy and problem-solving in a technology-rich environment). In traditional educational psychology, Bloom's taxonomy on cognitive domains is perceived as a core reference in the field and distinguishes between Low, Medium and Higher Order cognitive skills. However, Bloom's work on the hierarchical nature of cognitive skills has not been referenced by the OECD in its PIAAC documentation. This paper demonstrates - through a text-based analysis of the PIAAC's definitions of skills levels - that the OECD's description of cognitive skills resembles keywords used by Bloom but does not explicitly define these through a hierarchical approach. Instead, high level cognitive skills are mainly characterised through the ability to apply cognitive strategies to unfamiliar contexts outside the adults' immediate life circumstances.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] REVISITING MEMORY PALACE AND BLOOM'S TAXONOMY: AN EDUCATOR'S PERSPECTIVE
    Ang, S. M.
    [J]. 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI2010), 2010, : 3237 - 3237
  • [42] Pushing Critical Thinking Skills With Multiple-Choice Questions: Does Bloom's Taxonomy Work?
    Zaidi, Nikki L. Bibler
    Grob, Karri L.
    Monrad, Seetha M.
    Kurtz, Joshua B.
    Tai, Andrew
    Ahmed, Asra Z.
    Gruppen, Larry D.
    Santen, Sally A.
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2018, 93 (06) : 856 - 859
  • [43] Evaluating Four Corners Textbooks in Terms of Cognitive Processes Using Bloom's Revised Taxonomy
    Roohani, Ali
    Taheri, Farzaneh
    Poorzangeneh, Marziyeh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2013, 4 (02): : 51 - 67
  • [44] Evaluation of Cognitive Domain in Objective Exam of Physiotherapy Teaching Program by Using Bloom's Taxonomy
    Zahoor, Al-Wardha
    Farooqui, Sumaira Imran
    Khan, Amna
    Kazmi, Syed Abid Mehdi
    Qamar, Naveed
    Rizvi, Jaza
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND ALLIED SCIENCES NU, 2023, 13 (02): : 289 - 293
  • [45] Using bloom's taxonomy of the cognitive domain to structure a web-based course in marketing
    Whiteley, TR
    [J]. APPLICATIONS OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES IN EDUCATION AND TRAINING, 2004, : 307 - 312
  • [46] Teaching Learning Strategies: Connections to Bloom's Taxonomy
    Dong, Faye M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2014, 13 (04): : 59 - 61
  • [47] Exploring Bloom's Taxonomy as a Basis for Interactive Storytelling
    Harmon, Sarah
    Chatterton, Seth
    [J]. INTERACTIVE STORYTELLING, ICIDS 2018, 2018, 11318 : 171 - 175
  • [48] Analysing a test based on Bloom's revised taxonomy
    Korkmaz, Fahrettin
    Unsal, Serkan
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2016, 5 (03): : 170 - 183
  • [49] Beyond Bloom's: A Taxonomy for Teaching Engineering Practice
    McCahan, Susan
    Romkey, Lisa
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2014, 30 (05) : 1176 - 1189
  • [50] Literature Review and Use of Benjamin Bloom's Taxonomy
    Iwuchukwu, Matthew O.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND CULTURAL STUDIES, 2015, 2 (03): : 436 - 444