Unpacking PIAAC's cognitive skills measurements through engagement with Bloom's taxonomy

被引:3
|
作者
Boeren, Ellen [1 ,3 ]
Iniguez-Berrozpe, Tatiana [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow UK, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ Zarragoza ES, Zaragoza, Spain
[3] Univ Glasgow, Sch Educ, St Andrews Bldg,11 Eldon St, Glasgow G3 6NH, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
PIAAC; Literacy; Numeracy; Problem-solving; Proficiency levels; Bloom taxonomy; MATHEMATICS; EDUCATION; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101151
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The Programme for International Assessment of Adult Skills (PIAAC) surveys people between the ages of 16 and 65 and includes an assessment of cognitive skills (literacy, numeracy and problem-solving in a technology-rich environment). In traditional educational psychology, Bloom's taxonomy on cognitive domains is perceived as a core reference in the field and distinguishes between Low, Medium and Higher Order cognitive skills. However, Bloom's work on the hierarchical nature of cognitive skills has not been referenced by the OECD in its PIAAC documentation. This paper demonstrates - through a text-based analysis of the PIAAC's definitions of skills levels - that the OECD's description of cognitive skills resembles keywords used by Bloom but does not explicitly define these through a hierarchical approach. Instead, high level cognitive skills are mainly characterised through the ability to apply cognitive strategies to unfamiliar contexts outside the adults' immediate life circumstances.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An Evaluation of the Algerian EFL Baccalaureate Exam under the Cognitive Domains of Bloom's Taxonomy
    Belarbi, Fatine Merieme
    Bensafa, Abdelkader
    [J]. ARAB WORLD ENGLISH JOURNAL, 2020, 11 (04) : 534 - 546
  • [32] Classification of Internet Language Learning Resources Based on Bloom's Taxonomy and the Four Language Skills
    Maghdalena, Ajeng Hidayatul
    Syaifudin, Mokhamad
    Soraya, Irma
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING (ICONELT 2017), 2017, 145 : 234 - 239
  • [33] Examining Prospective Teachers' Analysis Skills of Instructional Objectives according to Revised Bloom's Taxonomy
    Akbulut Tas, Mukerrem
    Karabay Turan, Aysegul
    [J]. HACETTEPE UNIVERSITESI EGITIM FAKULTESI DERGISI-HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2020, 35 (03): : 594 - 612
  • [34] The Use of Bloom's Taxonomy in Feminist Philosophy
    Cimitile, Maria
    [J]. TEACHING PHILOSOPHY, 2008, 31 (04) : 297 - 310
  • [35] Bloom's Digital Taxonomy and Word Clouds
    Skiba, Diane J.
    [J]. NURSING EDUCATION PERSPECTIVES, 2013, 34 (04) : 277 - 280
  • [36] Was Bloom's Taxonomy Pointed in the Wrong Direction?
    Wineburg, Sam
    Schneider, Jack
    [J]. PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 2009, 91 (04) : 56 - 61
  • [37] Incorporating Environmental Education in English Language Teaching through Bloom's Revised Taxonomy
    Mete, Defne Erdem
    [J]. SELCUK UNIVERSITESI EDEBIYAT FAKULTESI DERGISI-SELCUK UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LETTERS, 2018, 40 : 33 - 44
  • [38] Supporting active cognitive processing in collaborative groups: The potential of Bloom's taxonomy as a labeling tool
    Valcke, Martin
    De Wever, Bram
    Zhu, Chang
    Deed, Craig
    [J]. INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2009, 12 (3-4): : 165 - 172
  • [39] Student Profile in Completing Questions Based on Cognitive Level of Bloom's Taxonomy By Anderson and Krathwohl
    Arlianty, Widinda Normalia
    Febriana, Beta Wulan
    Diniaty, Artina
    Fauzi'ah, Lina
    [J]. 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CHEMISTRY, CHEMICAL PROCESS AND ENGINEERING (IC3PE), 2018, 2026
  • [40] A COMBINATION METHOD OF SYNTACTIC AND SEMANTIC APPROACHES FOR CLASSIFYING EXAMINATION QUESTIONS INTO BLOOM'S TAXONOMY COGNITIVE
    Mohamed, Omar J.
    Zakar, Nawaf A.
    Alshaikhdeeb, Basel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 14 (02) : 935 - 950