Impacts of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging system on outcomes of differentiated thyroid cancer in Thai patients

被引:9
|
作者
Thewjitcharoen, Yotsapon [1 ]
Chatchomchuan, Waralee [1 ]
Karndumri, Krittadhee [1 ]
Porramatikul, Sriurai [1 ]
Krittiyawong, Sirinate [1 ]
Wanothayaroj, Ekgaluck [1 ]
Butadej, Siriwan [1 ]
Nakasatien, Soontaree [1 ]
Veerasomboonsin, Veekij [2 ]
Kanchanapituk, Auchai [3 ]
Rajatanavin, Rajata [1 ]
Himathongkam, Thep [1 ]
机构
[1] Theptarin Hosp, Diabet & Thyroid Ctr, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] Theptarin Hosp, Div Radiol, Bangkok, Thailand
[3] Theptarin Hosp, Div Surg, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
Differentiated thyroid cancer; AJCC; 8th edition; Staging;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06624
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: In 2018, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition (AJCC8) was introduced to replace the previous version (AJCC7) due to superiority of AJCC8 over AJCC7 for better prediction of survival from thyroid cancer. Aim: To compare AJCC staging systems with the American Thyroid Association (ATA) risk classification for the prediction of 5-year disease-free survival (DFS), and 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) in Thai patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with histopathologic diagnosis of DTC who were treated at Theptarin Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand from 1987 to 2019. Results: The study cohort included 262 differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients (papillary thyroid cancer 89.7% with a median time of follow-up 7.8 years). The number (%) of patients within each stage group by AJCC7 and AJCC8 respectively are as follows: Stage I: 173 (66.0%) vs. 232 (88.5%), Stage II: 33 (12.6%) vs. 24 (9.2%), Stage III: 36 (13.7%) vs. 2 (0.8%), Stage IV: 20 (7.7%) vs. 4 (1.5%). The ATA high risk group was found in 24.3% of AJCC7 Stage I compared with 23.7% of AJCC8 Stage I. The 5-year DFS rates in patients classified as stages I, II, III, and IV by AJCC8 were 87.9%, 45.8%, 0% and 25%, respectively. The 5-year DSS rates in patients classified as stages I, II, III and IV by AJCC8 were 98.7%, 100%, 100% and 0%, respectively. AJCC8 was more predictive of DFS rate than AJCC7. Conclusions: Our study is in accord with previous studies that AJCC8 downstage a significant percentage of patients with DTC and correlated with better prognostic validity. However, even a person at low risk for mortality can be at high risk for recurrence.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prognostic implications of the 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma
    Moeckelmann, Nikolaus
    Ebrahimi, Ardalan
    Tou, Ying K.
    Gupta, Ruta
    Low, Tsu-Hui
    Ashford, Bruce
    Ch'ng, Sydney
    Palme, Carsten E.
    Clark, Jonathan R.
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 85 : 82 - 86
  • [42] Poorly differentiated thyroid cancer in the context of the revised 2015 American Thyroid Association Guidelines and the Updated American Joint Committee on Cancer/Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging System (eighth edition)
    Walczyk, Agnieszka
    Kopczynski, Janusz
    Gasior-Perczak, Danuta
    Palyga, Iwona
    Kowalik, Artur
    Chrapek, Magdalena
    Hejnold, Maria
    Gozdz, Stanislaw
    Kowalska, Aldona
    CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2019, 91 (02) : 331 - 339
  • [43] Impact of the T and N stage in the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition staging system for pancreatic cancer with curative resection.
    Todaka, Akiko
    Fukutomi, Akira
    Furuta, Mitsuhiro
    Shirasu, Hiromichi
    Kawahira, Masahiro
    Kawakami, Takeshi
    Yoshida, Yukio
    Kawai, Sadayuki
    Hamauchi, Satoshi
    Tsushima, Takahiro
    Yokota, Tomoya
    Machida, Nozomu
    Yamazaki, Kentaro
    Onozawa, Yusuke
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (04)
  • [44] American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th Edition Classification of Primary Iris Melanoma: Outcomes Analysis in 432 Patients
    Bekerman, Vladislav Pavlovich
    Di Nicola, Maura
    Shields, Carol L.
    Alarcon, Carolina
    Fulco, Enzo
    Kaliki, Swathi
    Shields, Jerry A.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2017, 58 (08)
  • [45] Evaluation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th Edition Staging System for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in 1,008 Patients with Curative Resection
    Park, Sujin
    Choi, Sangjoon
    Cho, Yoon Ah
    Sinn, Dong Hyun
    Kim, Jong Man
    Park, Cheol-Keun
    Ha, Sang Yun
    CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2020, 52 (04): : 1145 - 1152
  • [46] Evaluation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th Edition Staging System for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in 1,034 Patients with Curative Resection
    Park, Sujin
    Choi, Sangjoon
    Park, Cheol-Keun
    Sinn, Dong Hyun
    Kim, Jong Man
    Ha, Sang Yun
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2019, 32
  • [47] AJCC Cancer Staging Manua, 8th edition
    Hoda, Syed A.
    ADVANCES IN ANATOMIC PATHOLOGY, 2017, 24 (02) : 112 - 112
  • [48] Evaluation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th Edition Staging System for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in 1,034 Patients with Curative Resection
    Park, Sujin
    Choi, Sangjoon
    Park, Cheol-Keun
    Sinn, Dong Hyun
    Kim, Jong Man
    Ha, Sang Yun
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2019, 99
  • [49] Evaluation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition staging system for gastric cancer patients after preoperative therapy
    Ikoma, Naruhiko
    Blum, Mariela
    Estrella, Jeannelyn S.
    Das, Prajnan
    Hofstetter, Wayne L.
    Fournier, Keith F.
    Mansfield, Paul
    Ajani, Jaffer A.
    Badgwell, Brian D.
    GASTRIC CANCER, 2018, 21 (01) : 74 - 83
  • [50] Evaluation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition staging system for gastric cancer patients after preoperative therapy
    Naruhiko Ikoma
    Mariela Blum
    Jeannelyn S. Estrella
    Prajnan Das
    Wayne L. Hofstetter
    Keith F. Fournier
    Paul Mansfield
    Jaffer A. Ajani
    Brian D. Badgwell
    Gastric Cancer, 2018, 21 : 74 - 83