Impacts of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging system on outcomes of differentiated thyroid cancer in Thai patients

被引:9
|
作者
Thewjitcharoen, Yotsapon [1 ]
Chatchomchuan, Waralee [1 ]
Karndumri, Krittadhee [1 ]
Porramatikul, Sriurai [1 ]
Krittiyawong, Sirinate [1 ]
Wanothayaroj, Ekgaluck [1 ]
Butadej, Siriwan [1 ]
Nakasatien, Soontaree [1 ]
Veerasomboonsin, Veekij [2 ]
Kanchanapituk, Auchai [3 ]
Rajatanavin, Rajata [1 ]
Himathongkam, Thep [1 ]
机构
[1] Theptarin Hosp, Diabet & Thyroid Ctr, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] Theptarin Hosp, Div Radiol, Bangkok, Thailand
[3] Theptarin Hosp, Div Surg, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
Differentiated thyroid cancer; AJCC; 8th edition; Staging;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06624
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: In 2018, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition (AJCC8) was introduced to replace the previous version (AJCC7) due to superiority of AJCC8 over AJCC7 for better prediction of survival from thyroid cancer. Aim: To compare AJCC staging systems with the American Thyroid Association (ATA) risk classification for the prediction of 5-year disease-free survival (DFS), and 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) in Thai patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with histopathologic diagnosis of DTC who were treated at Theptarin Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand from 1987 to 2019. Results: The study cohort included 262 differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients (papillary thyroid cancer 89.7% with a median time of follow-up 7.8 years). The number (%) of patients within each stage group by AJCC7 and AJCC8 respectively are as follows: Stage I: 173 (66.0%) vs. 232 (88.5%), Stage II: 33 (12.6%) vs. 24 (9.2%), Stage III: 36 (13.7%) vs. 2 (0.8%), Stage IV: 20 (7.7%) vs. 4 (1.5%). The ATA high risk group was found in 24.3% of AJCC7 Stage I compared with 23.7% of AJCC8 Stage I. The 5-year DFS rates in patients classified as stages I, II, III, and IV by AJCC8 were 87.9%, 45.8%, 0% and 25%, respectively. The 5-year DSS rates in patients classified as stages I, II, III and IV by AJCC8 were 98.7%, 100%, 100% and 0%, respectively. AJCC8 was more predictive of DFS rate than AJCC7. Conclusions: Our study is in accord with previous studies that AJCC8 downstage a significant percentage of patients with DTC and correlated with better prognostic validity. However, even a person at low risk for mortality can be at high risk for recurrence.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Updated AJCC/TNM Staging System for Papillary Thyroid Cancer (8th Edition): From the Perspective of Genomic Analysis
    Kim, Kyubo
    Kim, Jin Hwan
    Park, Il Seok
    Rho, Young Soo
    Kwon, Gee Hwan
    Lee, Dong Jin
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 42 (11) : 3624 - 3631
  • [32] Lymphnode staging update in the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition cancer staging manual
    Olawaiye, Alexander B.
    Mutch, David G.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 150 (01) : 7 - 8
  • [33] Validation of Ampulla of Vater Cancer Staging form the 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System
    Kim, Sung Joo
    An, Soyeon
    Yu, Eunsil
    Hong, Seung-Mo
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2017, 30 : 446A - 446A
  • [34] Validation of Ampulla of Vater Cancer Staging form the 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System
    Kim, Sung Joo
    An, Soyeon
    Yu, Eunsil
    Hong, Seung-Mo
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2017, 97 : 446A - 446A
  • [35] Validation of the 8th Edition of the AJCC TNM Staging System for Gastric Cancer using the National Cancer Database
    Haejin In
    I. Solsky
    B. Palis
    M. Langdon-Embry
    J. Ajani
    T. Sano
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2017, 24 : 3683 - 3691
  • [36] Embracing changes to the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition melanoma staging system
    Haydu, Lauren E.
    Thompson, John F.
    Scolyer, Richard A.
    Gershenwald, Jeffrey E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 112 : 9 - 11
  • [37] Validation of the 8th Edition of the AJCC TNM Staging System for Gastric Cancer using the National Cancer Database
    In, Haejin
    Solsky, I.
    Palis, B.
    Langdon-Embry, M.
    Ajani, J.
    Sano, T.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 (12) : 3683 - 3691
  • [38] Validations of the 8th edition of AJCC staging system for patients with pancreatic cancer
    Zhu, X.
    Ju, X.
    Cao, Y.
    Zhao, X.
    Shen, Y.
    Cao, F.
    Qing, S.
    Gu, L.
    Fang, F.
    Jia, Z.
    Zhang, H.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 141 : S19 - S19
  • [39] The 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC8) Staging Manual: any improvement in the prognostication of oral tongue cancer?
    Almangush, Alhadi
    Salo, Tuula
    CHINESE CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 8
  • [40] Sentinel lymph node biopsy for thin melanomas under the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition cancer staging system
    Harrison, Conrad
    Drury, Philippa
    Cassell, Oliver
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2018, 71 (01): : 120 - 121