Impacts of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging system on outcomes of differentiated thyroid cancer in Thai patients

被引:9
|
作者
Thewjitcharoen, Yotsapon [1 ]
Chatchomchuan, Waralee [1 ]
Karndumri, Krittadhee [1 ]
Porramatikul, Sriurai [1 ]
Krittiyawong, Sirinate [1 ]
Wanothayaroj, Ekgaluck [1 ]
Butadej, Siriwan [1 ]
Nakasatien, Soontaree [1 ]
Veerasomboonsin, Veekij [2 ]
Kanchanapituk, Auchai [3 ]
Rajatanavin, Rajata [1 ]
Himathongkam, Thep [1 ]
机构
[1] Theptarin Hosp, Diabet & Thyroid Ctr, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] Theptarin Hosp, Div Radiol, Bangkok, Thailand
[3] Theptarin Hosp, Div Surg, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
Differentiated thyroid cancer; AJCC; 8th edition; Staging;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06624
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: In 2018, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition (AJCC8) was introduced to replace the previous version (AJCC7) due to superiority of AJCC8 over AJCC7 for better prediction of survival from thyroid cancer. Aim: To compare AJCC staging systems with the American Thyroid Association (ATA) risk classification for the prediction of 5-year disease-free survival (DFS), and 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) in Thai patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with histopathologic diagnosis of DTC who were treated at Theptarin Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand from 1987 to 2019. Results: The study cohort included 262 differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients (papillary thyroid cancer 89.7% with a median time of follow-up 7.8 years). The number (%) of patients within each stage group by AJCC7 and AJCC8 respectively are as follows: Stage I: 173 (66.0%) vs. 232 (88.5%), Stage II: 33 (12.6%) vs. 24 (9.2%), Stage III: 36 (13.7%) vs. 2 (0.8%), Stage IV: 20 (7.7%) vs. 4 (1.5%). The ATA high risk group was found in 24.3% of AJCC7 Stage I compared with 23.7% of AJCC8 Stage I. The 5-year DFS rates in patients classified as stages I, II, III, and IV by AJCC8 were 87.9%, 45.8%, 0% and 25%, respectively. The 5-year DSS rates in patients classified as stages I, II, III and IV by AJCC8 were 98.7%, 100%, 100% and 0%, respectively. AJCC8 was more predictive of DFS rate than AJCC7. Conclusions: Our study is in accord with previous studies that AJCC8 downstage a significant percentage of patients with DTC and correlated with better prognostic validity. However, even a person at low risk for mortality can be at high risk for recurrence.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Changes to skin cancer staging in American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition
    Demir, Ahmet
    Unverdi, Omer Faruk
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 28 (01) : 65 - 73
  • [22] Comparison between the 7th and the 8th edition of TNM Staging System of American joint committee on Cancer(AJCC) for Breast Cancer Patients, diagnosed and treated at King Abdulaziz Medical City
    Abdelhafiez, Nafisa
    Alkushi, Abdulmohsen
    Alriyees, Lolwah
    Arabi, Mohammad
    Alsalamah, Faris
    Masuadi, Emad
    Omair, Ahmad
    Alkaiyat, Mohammad
    Shehata, Hussam
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 84 (09)
  • [23] Stratification of Patients With Stage IB NSCLC Based on the 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging Manual
    Wu, Lei-Lei
    Liu, Xuan
    Jiang, Wen-Mei
    Huang, Wei
    Lin, Peng
    Long, Hao
    Zhang, Lan-Jun
    Ma, Guo-Wei
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [24] The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Breast Cancer Staging 8th Edition Is More Reflective of Cancer Biology Than the 7th Edition
    Young, Jessica
    Asaoka, Mariko
    Edge, Stephen
    Kazuaki, Takabe
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (SUPPL 2) : S566 - S567
  • [25] A retrospective prognostic evaluation analysis using the 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) cancer staging system for luminal A breast cancer
    Ye, Jingming
    Wang, Wenjun
    Xu, Ling
    Duan, Xuening
    Cheng, Yuanjia
    Xin, Ling
    Zhang, Hong
    Zhang, Shuang
    Li, Ting
    Liu, Yinhua
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 29 (04) : 351 - 360
  • [26] Prognostic Implications of Altering the Nodal Staging for Anal Cancer in the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th (AJCC8) Edition Staging Manual
    Elson, J. K.
    Kachnic, L. A.
    Longo, J. M.
    Tao, R.
    Amarnath, S. R.
    Lloyd, S. A.
    Kharofa, J. R., Jr.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : E4 - E4
  • [27] Updated American Joint Committee on Cancer/Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging System for Differentiated and Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer (Eighth Edition): What Changed and Why?
    Tuttle, R. Michael
    Haugen, Bryan
    Perrier, Nancy D.
    THYROID, 2017, 27 (06) : 751 - 756
  • [28] A retrospective prognostic evaluation analysis using the 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC) cancer staging system for luminal A breast cancer
    Jingming Ye
    Wenjun Wang
    Ling Xu
    Xuening Duan
    Yuanjia Cheng
    Ling Xin
    Hong Zhang
    Shuang Zhang
    Ting Li
    Yinhua Liu
    Chinese Journal of Cancer Research, 2017, 29 (04) : 351 - 360
  • [29] International Validation of the Eighth Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM Staging System in Patients With Resected Pancreatic Cancer
    van Roessel, Stijn
    Kasumova, Gyulnara G.
    Verheij, Joanne
    Najarian, Robert M.
    Maggino, Laura
    de Pastena, Matteo
    Malleo, Giuseppe
    Marchegiani, Giovanni
    Salvia, Roberto
    Ng, Sing Chau
    de Geus, Susanna W.
    Lof, Sanne
    Giovinazzo, Francesco
    van Dam, Jacob L.
    Kent, Tara S.
    Busch, Olivier R.
    van Eijck, Casper H.
    Koerkamp, Bas Groot
    Abu Hilal, Mohammed
    Bassi, Claudio
    Tseng, Jennifer F.
    Besselink, Marc G.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2018, 153 (12)
  • [30] The Updated AJCC/TNM Staging System for Papillary Thyroid Cancer (8th Edition): From the Perspective of Genomic Analysis
    Kyubo Kim
    Jin Hwan Kim
    Il Seok Park
    Young Soo Rho
    Gee Hwan Kwon
    Dong Jin Lee
    World Journal of Surgery, 2018, 42 : 3624 - 3631