Impacts of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging system on outcomes of differentiated thyroid cancer in Thai patients

被引:9
|
作者
Thewjitcharoen, Yotsapon [1 ]
Chatchomchuan, Waralee [1 ]
Karndumri, Krittadhee [1 ]
Porramatikul, Sriurai [1 ]
Krittiyawong, Sirinate [1 ]
Wanothayaroj, Ekgaluck [1 ]
Butadej, Siriwan [1 ]
Nakasatien, Soontaree [1 ]
Veerasomboonsin, Veekij [2 ]
Kanchanapituk, Auchai [3 ]
Rajatanavin, Rajata [1 ]
Himathongkam, Thep [1 ]
机构
[1] Theptarin Hosp, Diabet & Thyroid Ctr, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] Theptarin Hosp, Div Radiol, Bangkok, Thailand
[3] Theptarin Hosp, Div Surg, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
Differentiated thyroid cancer; AJCC; 8th edition; Staging;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06624
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: In 2018, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition (AJCC8) was introduced to replace the previous version (AJCC7) due to superiority of AJCC8 over AJCC7 for better prediction of survival from thyroid cancer. Aim: To compare AJCC staging systems with the American Thyroid Association (ATA) risk classification for the prediction of 5-year disease-free survival (DFS), and 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) in Thai patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with histopathologic diagnosis of DTC who were treated at Theptarin Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand from 1987 to 2019. Results: The study cohort included 262 differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients (papillary thyroid cancer 89.7% with a median time of follow-up 7.8 years). The number (%) of patients within each stage group by AJCC7 and AJCC8 respectively are as follows: Stage I: 173 (66.0%) vs. 232 (88.5%), Stage II: 33 (12.6%) vs. 24 (9.2%), Stage III: 36 (13.7%) vs. 2 (0.8%), Stage IV: 20 (7.7%) vs. 4 (1.5%). The ATA high risk group was found in 24.3% of AJCC7 Stage I compared with 23.7% of AJCC8 Stage I. The 5-year DFS rates in patients classified as stages I, II, III, and IV by AJCC8 were 87.9%, 45.8%, 0% and 25%, respectively. The 5-year DSS rates in patients classified as stages I, II, III and IV by AJCC8 were 98.7%, 100%, 100% and 0%, respectively. AJCC8 was more predictive of DFS rate than AJCC7. Conclusions: Our study is in accord with previous studies that AJCC8 downstage a significant percentage of patients with DTC and correlated with better prognostic validity. However, even a person at low risk for mortality can be at high risk for recurrence.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stage migration with the new American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system (8th edition) for differentiated thyroid cancer
    Shaha, Ashok R.
    Migliacci, Jocelyn C.
    Nixon, Lain J.
    Wang, Laura Y.
    Wong, Richard J.
    Morris, Luc G. T.
    Patel, Snehal G.
    Shah, Jatin P.
    Tuttle, R. Michael
    Ganly, Ian
    SURGERY, 2019, 165 (01) : 6 - 11
  • [2] Disparities in the impact of the AJCC 8th edition staging system on differentiated thyroid cancer outcomes
    Santamaria-Barria, Juan A.
    Graff-Baker, Amanda N.
    Chang, Shu-Ching
    Khader, Adam
    Scholer, Anthony J.
    Garland-Kledzik, Mary
    Goldfarb, Melanie
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2022, 44 (10): : 2129 - 2141
  • [3] Melanoma Staging: American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th Edition and Beyond
    Gershenwald, Jeffrey E.
    Scolyer, Richard A.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (08) : 2105 - 2110
  • [4] Melanoma Staging: American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th Edition and Beyond
    Jeffrey E. Gershenwald
    Richard A. Scolyer
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2018, 25 : 2105 - 2110
  • [5] Correction to: Melanoma Staging: American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th Edition and Beyond
    Jeffrey E. Gershenwald
    Richard A. Scolyer
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2018, 25 : 993 - 994
  • [6] JUSTIFICATION OF 8TH EDITION AJCC TUMOR NODE METASTASIS UPDATES FOR BLADDER CANCER STAGING
    Daniels, Marcus
    Bivalacqua, Trinity
    Matoso, Andres
    Kates, Max
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E540 - E541
  • [7] Historical progress of the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual in patients with breast cancer
    Kosaka, Yoshimasa
    Nishimiya, Hiroshi
    Kikuchi, Mariko
    Waraya, Mina
    Katoh, Hiroshi
    Sengoku, Norihiko
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 8 (03) : 719 - 721
  • [8] VALIDATION OF THE AMERICAN JOIN COMMITTEE ON CANCER (AJCC) 8TH EDITION PROSTATE CANCER STAGING SYSTEM
    Bhindi, Bimal
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Rangel, Laureano
    Mason, Ross
    Gettman, Matthey
    Frank, Igor
    Tollefson, Matthew
    Thompson, R. Houston
    Boorjian, Stephen
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E239 - E239
  • [9] Prognostic performance of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition of the TNM staging system in patients with early oral tongue cancer
    Amit, Moran
    Tam, Samantha
    Takahashi, Hideaki
    Choi, Karen Y.
    Zafereo, Mark
    Bell, Diana
    Weber, Randal S.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2019, 41 (05): : 1270 - 1276
  • [10] Validation of American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition of TNM staging in resected distal pancreatic cancer
    Feng Yin
    Mohammed Saad
    Hao Xie
    Jingmei Lin
    Christopher R Jackson
    Bing Ren
    Cynthia Lawson
    Dipti M Karamchandani
    Belen Quereda Bernabeu
    Wei Jiang
    Teena Dhir
    Richard Zheng
    Christopher W Schultz
    Dongwei Zhang
    Courtney L Thomas
    Xuchen Zhang
    Jinping Lai
    Michael Schild
    Xuefeng Zhang
    Xiuli Liu
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2020, 11 (02) : 25 - 39