Design criteria for structural design of silage silo walls

被引:1
|
作者
von Wachenfelt, Hans E. [1 ]
Nilsson, N. Christer [1 ]
Ostergard, Goran I. [2 ]
Olofsson, N. Anders [2 ]
Karlsson, J. Marie [2 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Biosyst & Technol, SE-23053 Alnarp, Sweden
[2] Abetong AB, Heidelberg Cement Grp, SE-35103 Vaxjo, Sweden
关键词
Bunker silo; Wall; Silage; Pressure; Force; LOADS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.07.007
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Existing Swedish design guidelines (JBR) cover silo wall heights up to about 3 m. These guidelines presumably overestimate the forces and pressures exerted by silage juice when silo walls are more than 3 m high, which could result in over-sizing, material waste and increased capital costs. This study determined silage physical properties in terms of horizontal wall pressure and evaluated silage juice levels in silos with a wall height of 3 m or more. Wall pressure was measured by transducers mounted on a steel ladder rack placed vertically along the internal silo wall. The ladder rack also permitted measurement of silage juice levels in slotted steel pipes. The pressure on the transducers was recorded by a data acquisition system displaying static and total loads (pressures imposed by silage material without and with the compaction machine, respectively). The static pressure at the bottom of the silo wall (4 m) was 16 kPa during filling and compaction, and 22 kPa 1-4 months after filling. The silage juice did not interact with compaction. The wall pressure increased by 30% after filling, but the increase was only significant at 1 m from the silo bottom. The dynamic load was 17 kPa when the compaction machine passed 0.1 m from the silo wall. New guidelines are proposed based on the results and on the Eurocode for ultimate limit states (ULS) for two stages; filling and the utility period. The design bending moment for ULS was 21% lower than specified in JBR. (C) 2014 IAgrE. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 103
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] STRUCTURAL DESIGN CRITERIA FOR HTR - A SUMMARY REPORT
    SCHUBERT, F
    NICKEL, H
    BREITBACH, G
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 1991, 132 (01) : 75 - 84
  • [42] STRUCTURAL DESIGN CRITERIA FOR SECONDARY CONTAINMENT STRUCTURES
    HALLIGAN, DW
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 1968, 8 (04) : 427 - &
  • [43] A UNIFIED OPTIMALITY CRITERIA METHOD IN STRUCTURAL DESIGN
    XIA, RW
    ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 1984, 8 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [44] Selection criteria for structural steel: Design considerations
    Malley, JO
    STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 1999, : 745 - 748
  • [45] NLFE ANALYSIS OF RC STRUCTURAL WALLS AND DESIGN IMPLICATIONS
    LEFAS, ID
    KOTSOVOS, MD
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1990, 116 (01): : 146 - 164
  • [46] Structural design criteria for oxyanion receptors.
    Hay, BP
    Gutowski, MS
    Dixon, DA
    Bryan, JC
    Moyer, BA
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2002, 224 : U709 - U709
  • [47] A REINFORCED POLYESTER SILO FOR SILAGE
    HANGELBR.PB
    THART, C
    LANDBOUWMECHANISATIE, 1969, 20 (05): : 447 - &
  • [48] PRESSURES ON SILO WALLS
    DEUTSCH, GP
    HARDCAST.
    RICHARDS
    SCHMIDT, LC
    MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 1969, 91 (01) : 44 - &
  • [49] PRESSURES ON SILO WALLS
    DEUTSCH, GP
    SCHMIDT, LC
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY, 1969, 91 (02): : 450 - &
  • [50] Cracks in silo walls
    不详
    ZKG INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 67 (10): : 60 - 65