Design criteria for structural design of silage silo walls

被引:1
|
作者
von Wachenfelt, Hans E. [1 ]
Nilsson, N. Christer [1 ]
Ostergard, Goran I. [2 ]
Olofsson, N. Anders [2 ]
Karlsson, J. Marie [2 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Biosyst & Technol, SE-23053 Alnarp, Sweden
[2] Abetong AB, Heidelberg Cement Grp, SE-35103 Vaxjo, Sweden
关键词
Bunker silo; Wall; Silage; Pressure; Force; LOADS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.07.007
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Existing Swedish design guidelines (JBR) cover silo wall heights up to about 3 m. These guidelines presumably overestimate the forces and pressures exerted by silage juice when silo walls are more than 3 m high, which could result in over-sizing, material waste and increased capital costs. This study determined silage physical properties in terms of horizontal wall pressure and evaluated silage juice levels in silos with a wall height of 3 m or more. Wall pressure was measured by transducers mounted on a steel ladder rack placed vertically along the internal silo wall. The ladder rack also permitted measurement of silage juice levels in slotted steel pipes. The pressure on the transducers was recorded by a data acquisition system displaying static and total loads (pressures imposed by silage material without and with the compaction machine, respectively). The static pressure at the bottom of the silo wall (4 m) was 16 kPa during filling and compaction, and 22 kPa 1-4 months after filling. The silage juice did not interact with compaction. The wall pressure increased by 30% after filling, but the increase was only significant at 1 m from the silo bottom. The dynamic load was 17 kPa when the compaction machine passed 0.1 m from the silo wall. New guidelines are proposed based on the results and on the Eurocode for ultimate limit states (ULS) for two stages; filling and the utility period. The design bending moment for ULS was 21% lower than specified in JBR. (C) 2014 IAgrE. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 103
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Structural topology design with multiple thermal criteria
    Li, Q
    Steven, GP
    Querin, OM
    Xie, YM
    ENGINEERING COMPUTATIONS, 2000, 17 (6-7) : 715 - 734
  • [32] Serviceability criteria for structural design in prescriptive documents
    Markova, J.
    Holicky, M.
    Navarova, L.
    SAFETY AND RELIABILITY - SAFE SOCIETIES IN A CHANGING WORLD, 2018, : 2249 - 2253
  • [33] Design criteria for the damping effectiveness of structural fuzzies
    Maidanik, G
    Dickey, J
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1996, 100 (04): : 2029 - 2033
  • [34] DESIGN CRITERIA FOR STRUCTURAL SANDWICH PANELS.
    Davies, J.M.
    Structural Engineer, 1987, 65 (12): : 435 - 441
  • [35] SUGGESTED STRUCTURAL DESIGN CRITERIA FOR NUCLEAR GRAPHITES
    STANCAMP.PA
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1974, 18 (JUN23): : 265 - 266
  • [36] ELASTIC DESIGN CHARTS OF STIFFENED COUPLED STRUCTURAL WALLS
    CHAN, HC
    KUANG, JS
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1989, 115 (02): : 247 - 267
  • [37] Behaviour of deformable blast walls for protective structural design
    Kilic, S. A.
    Smith, P. D.
    COST ACTION C26: URBAN HABITAT CONSTRUCTIONS UNDER CATASTROPHIC EVENTS, 2010, : 477 - 480
  • [38] DESIGN CRITERIA FOR THERMOPLASTIC STRUCTURAL FOAM.
    Throne, James L.
    Plastics Design & Processing, 1976, 16 (09): : 20 - 23
  • [39] PROBABILITY-BASED CRITERIA FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN
    ELLINGWOOD, B
    GALAMBOS, TV
    STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 1982, 1 (01) : 15 - 26
  • [40] Optical performance criteria in optimum structural design
    Genberg, V
    OPTOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING AND VIBRATION CONTROL, 1999, 3786 : 248 - 255