Design criteria for structural design of silage silo walls

被引:1
|
作者
von Wachenfelt, Hans E. [1 ]
Nilsson, N. Christer [1 ]
Ostergard, Goran I. [2 ]
Olofsson, N. Anders [2 ]
Karlsson, J. Marie [2 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Biosyst & Technol, SE-23053 Alnarp, Sweden
[2] Abetong AB, Heidelberg Cement Grp, SE-35103 Vaxjo, Sweden
关键词
Bunker silo; Wall; Silage; Pressure; Force; LOADS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.07.007
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Existing Swedish design guidelines (JBR) cover silo wall heights up to about 3 m. These guidelines presumably overestimate the forces and pressures exerted by silage juice when silo walls are more than 3 m high, which could result in over-sizing, material waste and increased capital costs. This study determined silage physical properties in terms of horizontal wall pressure and evaluated silage juice levels in silos with a wall height of 3 m or more. Wall pressure was measured by transducers mounted on a steel ladder rack placed vertically along the internal silo wall. The ladder rack also permitted measurement of silage juice levels in slotted steel pipes. The pressure on the transducers was recorded by a data acquisition system displaying static and total loads (pressures imposed by silage material without and with the compaction machine, respectively). The static pressure at the bottom of the silo wall (4 m) was 16 kPa during filling and compaction, and 22 kPa 1-4 months after filling. The silage juice did not interact with compaction. The wall pressure increased by 30% after filling, but the increase was only significant at 1 m from the silo bottom. The dynamic load was 17 kPa when the compaction machine passed 0.1 m from the silo wall. New guidelines are proposed based on the results and on the Eurocode for ultimate limit states (ULS) for two stages; filling and the utility period. The design bending moment for ULS was 21% lower than specified in JBR. (C) 2014 IAgrE. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 103
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] INFLUENCE OF WALL FRICTION ON SILO DESIGN IN PROCESS AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING.
    Schwedes, Joerg
    German chemical engineering, 1985, 8 (03): : 131 - 138
  • [22] Rheological approach to silo design
    Hernandez, J.
    Zenit, R.
    Mena, B.
    Proceedings of the International Congress on Rheology, 1992,
  • [23] EXAMPLES OF MODERN SILO DESIGN
    SCHWEDES, J
    SCHULZE, D
    ZEMENT-KALK-GIPS, 1991, 44 (10): : 497 - 503
  • [24] Limits of Silo Design Codes
    Carson, John W.
    PRACTICE PERIODICAL ON STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 20 (02)
  • [25] Low cost silo design
    Shalouf, Fathalla
    Kobielak, S.
    Powder Handling and Processing, 2000, 12 (02): : 127 - 129
  • [26] LIMIT STATE STRENGTH DESIGN CRITERIA FOR SLENDER AND SHEAR WALLS
    HART, GC
    BRICK AND BLOCK MASONRY, VOLS 1-3, 1988, : 1131 - 1139
  • [27] Demonstration of the effectiveness of U*-based design criteria on vehicle structural design
    Wang, Qingguo
    Pejhan, Khashayar
    Telichev, Igor
    Wu, Christine Qiong
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART D-JOURNAL OF AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING, 2018, 232 (08) : 995 - 1002
  • [28] STRUCTURAL LOADS ON BUNKER SILO WALLS - EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY
    ZHAO, QQ
    JOFRIET, JC
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 1991, 50 (04): : 273 - 290
  • [29] APPLICATION OF OPTIMALITY CRITERIA TO AUTOMATED STRUCTURAL DESIGN
    DOBBS, MW
    NELSON, RB
    AIAA JOURNAL, 1976, 14 (10) : 1436 - 1443
  • [30] Structural topology design with multiple thermal criteria
    Li, Qing
    Steven, Grant P.
    Querin, Osvaldo M.
    Xie, Y.M.
    Engineering Computations (Swansea, Wales), 2000, 17 (6-7): : 715 - 734