Vectorcardiographic QRS area as a novel predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

被引:74
|
作者
van Deursen, Caroline J. M. [1 ,2 ]
Vernooy, Kevin [2 ]
Dudink, Elton [2 ]
Bergfeldt, Lennart [3 ]
Crijns, Harry J. G. M. [2 ]
Prinzen, Frits W. [1 ]
Wecke, Liliane [4 ]
机构
[1] Cardiovasc Res Inst Maastricht, Dept Physiol, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Cardiovasc Res Inst Maastricht, Dept Cardiol, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Dept Mol & Clin Med Cardiol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Inst, Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Cardiac resynchronization therapy; QRS area; Vectorcardiography; BUNDLE-BRANCH BLOCK; CHRONIC HEART-FAILURE; 12-LEAD ECG; TASK-FORCE; MORPHOLOGY; DURATION; GUIDELINES; CARDIOLOGY; CRITERIA; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2014.10.003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: QRS duration and left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology are used to select patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We investigated whether the area of the QRS complex (QRS(AREA)) on the 3-dimensional vectorcardiogram (VCG) can improve patient selection. Methods: VCG (Frank orthogonal lead system) was recorded prior to CRT device implantation in 81 consecutive patients. VCG parameters, including QRSAREA, were assessed, and compared to QRS duration and morphology. Three LBBB definitions were used, differing in requirement of mid-QRS notching. Responders to CRT (CRT-R) were defined as patients with 15% reduction in left ventricular end systolic volume after 6 months of CRT. Results: Fifty-seven patients (70%) were CRT-R. QRSAREA was larger in CRT-R than in CRT nonresponders (140 +/- 42 vs 100 +/- 40 mu Vs, p < 0.001) and predicted CRT response better than QRS duration (AUC 0.78 vs 0.62, p = 0.030). With a 98 mu Ns cutoff value, QRSAREA identified CRT-R with an odds ratio (OR) of 10.2 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 3.4 to 31.1. This OR was higher than that for QRS duration >156 ms (OR = 2.5; 95% CI 0.9 to 6.6), conventional LBBB classification (OR = 5.5; 95% CI 0.9 to 32.4) or LBBB classification according to American guidelines (OR = 4.5; 95% CI 1.6 to 12.6) or Strauss (OR = 10.0; 95% CI 3.2 to 31.1). Conclusion: QRS(AREA) is an objective electrophysiological predictor of CRT response that performs at least as good as the most refined definition of LBBB. Condensed abstract: In 81 candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) we measured the area of the QRS complex (QRS(AREA)) using 3-dimensional vectorcardiography. QRS(AREA) was larger in echocardiographic responders than in non-responders and predicted CRT response better than QRS duration and than simple LBBB criteria. ORSAREA is a promising electrophysiological predictor of CRT response. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 52
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Vectorcardiographic QRS area as a predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Mohammed A Ghossein
    Antonius MW van Stipdonk
    Frits W Prinzen
    Kevin Vernooy
    [J]. Journal of Geriatric Cardiology, 2022, 19 (01) : 9 - 20
  • [2] Vectorcardiographic QRS area as a predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Ghossein, Mohammed A.
    Van Stipdonk, Antonius Mw
    Prinzen, Frits W.
    Vernooy, Kevin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 19 (01) : 9 - 20
  • [3] Cardiac resynchronization therapy: QRS index as a response predictor
    Martinez Lopez, Frank
    Castaneda Chirino, Osmin
    Falcon Rodriguez, Roylan
    Castro Hevia, Jesus A.
    Dorantes Sanchez, Margarita
    Cruz Cardentey, Marleny
    Mengana Betancourt, Ana
    Gutierrez Lopez, Alain
    de Zayas Galguera, Joanna
    Quinones Milian, Inti R.
    Cabrera Ortega, Michel
    de la Vega Valcarcel, Katherine
    [J]. CORSALUD, 2019, 11 (03): : 189 - 195
  • [4] Notched QRS Complex in Lateral Leads as a Novel Predictor of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Pan, Wenzhi
    Su, Yangang
    Zhu, Wenqin
    Shu, Xianhong
    Ge, Junbo
    [J]. ANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2013, 18 (02) : 181 - 187
  • [5] QRS area as a predictor of cardiac resynchronization therapy response: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tokavanich, Nithi
    Prasitlumkum, Narut
    Mongkonsritragoon, Wimwipa
    Trongtorsak, Angkawipa
    Cheungpasitporn, Wisit
    Chokesuwattanaskul, Ronpichai
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 45 (03): : 393 - 400
  • [6] Vectorcardiographic QRS area is associated with long-term outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Emerek, Kasper
    Friedman, Daniel J.
    Sorensen, Peter Lyngo
    Hansen, Steen Moller
    Larsen, Jacob Moesgaard
    Risum, Niels
    Thogersen, Anna Margrethe
    Graff, Claus
    Kisslo, Joseph
    Sogaard, Peter
    Atwater, Brett D.
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM, 2019, 16 (02) : 213 - 219
  • [7] Hyponatremia in Cardiac Resynchronized Therapy - Is This a Novel Predictor of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy?
    Seguchi, Osamu
    [J]. CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2013, 77 (01) : 47 - 48
  • [8] A novel electrocardiographic predictor of clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Mollo, Roberto
    Cosenza, Alessandro
    Coviello, Ilaria
    Stazi, Alessandra
    Russo, Giulio
    Villano, Angelo
    Sestito, Alfonso
    Bencardino, Gianluigi
    Lanza, Gaetano A.
    Crea, Filippo
    [J]. EUROPACE, 2013, 15 (11): : 1615 - 1621
  • [9] Presence of notched QRS on paced electrocardiographs as a predictor of poor response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Wang Jiayu
    Zhang Ping
    Li Xuebin
    Zhu Tiangang
    Li Hua
    Wang Long
    Li Ding
    Wu Cuncao
    Gao Ying
    Tian Yun
    Guo Jihong
    [J]. CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 127 (15) : 2727 - 2734
  • [10] Fully automated QRS area measurement for predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Plesinger, Filip
    van Stipdonk, Antonius M. W.
    Smisek, Radovan
    Halamek, Josef
    Jurak, Pavel
    Maass, Alexander H.
    Meine, Mathias
    Vernooy, Kevin
    Prinzen, Frits W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2020, 63 : 159 - 163