Vectorcardiographic QRS area as a novel predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

被引:74
|
作者
van Deursen, Caroline J. M. [1 ,2 ]
Vernooy, Kevin [2 ]
Dudink, Elton [2 ]
Bergfeldt, Lennart [3 ]
Crijns, Harry J. G. M. [2 ]
Prinzen, Frits W. [1 ]
Wecke, Liliane [4 ]
机构
[1] Cardiovasc Res Inst Maastricht, Dept Physiol, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Cardiovasc Res Inst Maastricht, Dept Cardiol, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Dept Mol & Clin Med Cardiol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Inst, Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Cardiac resynchronization therapy; QRS area; Vectorcardiography; BUNDLE-BRANCH BLOCK; CHRONIC HEART-FAILURE; 12-LEAD ECG; TASK-FORCE; MORPHOLOGY; DURATION; GUIDELINES; CARDIOLOGY; CRITERIA; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2014.10.003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: QRS duration and left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology are used to select patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We investigated whether the area of the QRS complex (QRS(AREA)) on the 3-dimensional vectorcardiogram (VCG) can improve patient selection. Methods: VCG (Frank orthogonal lead system) was recorded prior to CRT device implantation in 81 consecutive patients. VCG parameters, including QRSAREA, were assessed, and compared to QRS duration and morphology. Three LBBB definitions were used, differing in requirement of mid-QRS notching. Responders to CRT (CRT-R) were defined as patients with 15% reduction in left ventricular end systolic volume after 6 months of CRT. Results: Fifty-seven patients (70%) were CRT-R. QRSAREA was larger in CRT-R than in CRT nonresponders (140 +/- 42 vs 100 +/- 40 mu Vs, p < 0.001) and predicted CRT response better than QRS duration (AUC 0.78 vs 0.62, p = 0.030). With a 98 mu Ns cutoff value, QRSAREA identified CRT-R with an odds ratio (OR) of 10.2 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 3.4 to 31.1. This OR was higher than that for QRS duration >156 ms (OR = 2.5; 95% CI 0.9 to 6.6), conventional LBBB classification (OR = 5.5; 95% CI 0.9 to 32.4) or LBBB classification according to American guidelines (OR = 4.5; 95% CI 1.6 to 12.6) or Strauss (OR = 10.0; 95% CI 3.2 to 31.1). Conclusion: QRS(AREA) is an objective electrophysiological predictor of CRT response that performs at least as good as the most refined definition of LBBB. Condensed abstract: In 81 candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) we measured the area of the QRS complex (QRS(AREA)) using 3-dimensional vectorcardiography. QRS(AREA) was larger in echocardiographic responders than in non-responders and predicted CRT response better than QRS duration and than simple LBBB criteria. ORSAREA is a promising electrophysiological predictor of CRT response. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 52
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] QRS INDEX TO PREDICT CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY RESPONSE: A TRICENTRIC STUDY
    Madaudo, Cristina
    Prezioso, Amedeo
    Bonni', Enrico
    Mascioli, Giosue
    Pecora, Domenico
    Ciaramitaro, Gianfranco
    La Greca, Carmelo
    Zanchi, Simone
    Cuccia, Claudio
    Novo, Giuseppina
    Corrado, Egle
    Coppola, Giuseppe
    Galassi, Alfredo Ruggero
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2022, 24
  • [42] QRS INDEX TO PREDICT CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY RESPONSE: A TRICENTRIC STUDY
    Madaudo, C.
    Coppola, G.
    Mascioli, G.
    D'Ardia, G.
    La Greca, C.
    Prezioso, A.
    Corrado, E.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2024, 26 : ii94 - ii94
  • [43] QRS INDEX TO PREDICT CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY RESPONSE: A TRICENTRIC STUDY
    Madaudo, C.
    Prezioso, A.
    Bonni, E.
    Mascioli, G.
    Pecora, D.
    Ciaramitaro, G.
    La Greca, C.
    Zanchi, S.
    Cuccia, C.
    D'Ardia, G.
    Novo, G.
    Galassi, A.
    Corrado, E.
    Coppola, G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2023, 25 : D136 - D136
  • [44] Relation between terminal QRS axis and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Koopman, Pieter
    Jehoul, Pieter
    Keskin, Mehmet
    Van Beveren, Jan
    Van Eyken, Jozef
    Schurmans, Joris
    Dilling, Dagmara
    Vijgen, Johan
    [J]. ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 2017, 72 (01) : 88 - 89
  • [45] Number of Leads With Fragmented QRS Predicts Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Celikyurt, Umut
    Agacdiken, Aysen
    Sahin, Tayfun
    Al, Neslihan
    Kozdag, Guliz
    Vural, Ahmet
    Ural, Dilek
    [J]. CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 36 (01) : 36 - 39
  • [46] Relationship between vectorcardiographic QRSarea, myocardial scar quantification, and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Uyen Chau Nguyen
    Claridge, Simon
    Vernooy, Kevin
    Engels, Elien B.
    Razavi, Reza
    Rinaldi, Christopher A.
    Chen, Zhong
    Prinzen, Frits W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2018, 51 (03) : 457 - 463
  • [47] Myocardial contractile reserve as a predictor of cardiac resynchronization therapy response
    Sturdivant, JL
    Gold, MR
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM, 2006, 3 (04) : 414 - 415
  • [48] Association of vectorcardiographic T-wave area with clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Dural, Muhammet
    Ghossein, Mohammed A.
    Gerrits, Willem
    Daniels, Fenna
    Meine, Mathias
    Maass, Alexander H.
    Rienstra, Michiel
    Prinzen, Frits W.
    Vernooy, Kevin
    van Stipdonk, Antonius M. W.
    [J]. EUROPACE, 2023, 26 (01):
  • [49] Differential Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Clinical Outcomes According to QRS Morphology and QRS Duration
    Dupont, Matthias
    Rickard, John
    Baranowski, Bryan
    Varma, Niraj
    Dresing, Thomas
    Gabi, Alaa
    Finucan, Michael
    Mullens, Wilfried
    Wilkoff, Bruce L.
    Tang, W. H. Wilson
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 60 (07) : 592 - 598
  • [50] QRS decomposition using the morlet wavelet transformation as a novel tool for predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Vassilikos, V.
    Mantziari, L.
    Kamperidis, V.
    Dakos, G.
    Kalpidis, P.
    Chatzizisis, Y. S.
    Giannakoulas, G.
    Paraskevaidis, S.
    Styliadis, I. H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2011, 32 : 140 - 140