Vectorcardiographic QRS area as a novel predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

被引:74
|
作者
van Deursen, Caroline J. M. [1 ,2 ]
Vernooy, Kevin [2 ]
Dudink, Elton [2 ]
Bergfeldt, Lennart [3 ]
Crijns, Harry J. G. M. [2 ]
Prinzen, Frits W. [1 ]
Wecke, Liliane [4 ]
机构
[1] Cardiovasc Res Inst Maastricht, Dept Physiol, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Cardiovasc Res Inst Maastricht, Dept Cardiol, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Dept Mol & Clin Med Cardiol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Inst, Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Cardiac resynchronization therapy; QRS area; Vectorcardiography; BUNDLE-BRANCH BLOCK; CHRONIC HEART-FAILURE; 12-LEAD ECG; TASK-FORCE; MORPHOLOGY; DURATION; GUIDELINES; CARDIOLOGY; CRITERIA; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2014.10.003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: QRS duration and left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology are used to select patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We investigated whether the area of the QRS complex (QRS(AREA)) on the 3-dimensional vectorcardiogram (VCG) can improve patient selection. Methods: VCG (Frank orthogonal lead system) was recorded prior to CRT device implantation in 81 consecutive patients. VCG parameters, including QRSAREA, were assessed, and compared to QRS duration and morphology. Three LBBB definitions were used, differing in requirement of mid-QRS notching. Responders to CRT (CRT-R) were defined as patients with 15% reduction in left ventricular end systolic volume after 6 months of CRT. Results: Fifty-seven patients (70%) were CRT-R. QRSAREA was larger in CRT-R than in CRT nonresponders (140 +/- 42 vs 100 +/- 40 mu Vs, p < 0.001) and predicted CRT response better than QRS duration (AUC 0.78 vs 0.62, p = 0.030). With a 98 mu Ns cutoff value, QRSAREA identified CRT-R with an odds ratio (OR) of 10.2 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 3.4 to 31.1. This OR was higher than that for QRS duration >156 ms (OR = 2.5; 95% CI 0.9 to 6.6), conventional LBBB classification (OR = 5.5; 95% CI 0.9 to 32.4) or LBBB classification according to American guidelines (OR = 4.5; 95% CI 1.6 to 12.6) or Strauss (OR = 10.0; 95% CI 3.2 to 31.1). Conclusion: QRS(AREA) is an objective electrophysiological predictor of CRT response that performs at least as good as the most refined definition of LBBB. Condensed abstract: In 81 candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) we measured the area of the QRS complex (QRS(AREA)) using 3-dimensional vectorcardiography. QRS(AREA) was larger in echocardiographic responders than in non-responders and predicted CRT response better than QRS duration and than simple LBBB criteria. ORSAREA is a promising electrophysiological predictor of CRT response. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 52
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Relationship between fragmented QRS and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Umut Celikyurt
    Aysen Agacdiken
    Tayfun Sahin
    Neslihan Al
    Ahmet Vural
    Dilek Ural
    [J]. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2012, 35 : 337 - 342
  • [32] QRS prolongation after cardiac resynchronization therapy is a predictor of persistent mechanical dyssynchrony
    Oguz Karaca
    Onur Omaygenc
    Beytullah Cakal
    Sinem Deniz Cakal
    Irfan Barutcu
    Bilal Boztosun
    Fethi Kilicaslan
    [J]. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2016, 46 : 105 - 113
  • [33] QRS prolongation after cardiac resynchronization therapy is a predictor of persistent mechanical dyssynchrony
    Karaca, Oguz
    Omaygenc, Onur
    Cakal, Beytullah
    Cakal, Sinem Deniz
    Barutcu, Irfan
    Boztosun, Bilal
    Kilicaslan, Fethi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 46 (02) : 105 - 113
  • [34] QRS dispersion is better than QRS duration for predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Chavez-Gonzalez, Elibet
    Moreno-Martinez, Francisco L.
    [J]. HELLENIC JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 57 (05) : 366 - 367
  • [35] Time interval from left ventricular stimulation to QRS onset is a novel predictor of nonresponse to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Yagishita, Daigo
    Shoda, Morio
    Yagishita, Yoshimi
    Ejima, Koichiro
    Hagiwara, Nobuhisa
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM, 2019, 16 (03) : 395 - 402
  • [36] Response to Letter From Vereckei Regarding, "QRS Area Is a Strong Determinant of Outcome in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy"
    van Stipdonk, Antonius M. W.
    ter Horst, Iris
    Kloosterman, Marielle
    Engels, Elien B.
    Rienstra, Michiel
    Crijns, Harry J. G. M.
    Vos, Marc A.
    van Gelder, Isabelle C.
    Prinzen, Frits W.
    Meine, Mathias
    Maass, Alexander
    Vernooy, Kevin
    [J]. CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 12 (04):
  • [37] T-Wave Area as an Additional Predictor of Volumetric and Clinical Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Engels, Elien B.
    Vegh, Eszter M.
    van Deursen, Caroline J.
    Vernooy, Kevin
    Singh, Jagmeet P.
    Prinzen, Frits W.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2014, 130
  • [38] CHARACTERIZATION OF RESPONSE TO CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH A NARROW QRS COMPLEX
    Rickard, Jack
    Cronin, Edmond
    Spragg, David
    Cheng, Alan
    Tang, Wai Hong
    Grimm, Richard
    Wilkoff, Bruce
    Varma, Niraj
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 61 (10) : E357 - E357
  • [39] Association between Resolution of Fragmented QRS and Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Celikyurt, Umut
    Karauzum, Kurtulus
    Sahin, Tayfun
    Agacdiken, Aysen
    Vural, Ahmet
    Ural, Dilek
    [J]. ANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2015, 20 (02) : 126 - 131
  • [40] Predictive role of QRS hieroglyphic morphology for response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Tsiachris, D.
    Dilaveris, P.
    Vouliotis, A. P.
    Sideris, S.
    Trantalis, G.
    Arsenos, P.
    Gatzoulis, K.
    Kallikazaros, I.
    Stefanadis, C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2011, 32 : 140 - 140