Analysis of feature relevance using an image quality index applied to digital mammography

被引:0
|
作者
Costa, Arthur C. [1 ,3 ]
Barufaldi, Bruno [2 ]
Borges, Lucas R. [1 ]
Biehl, Michael [3 ]
Maidment, Andrew D. A. [2 ]
Vieira, Marcelo A. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Groningen, Bernoulli Inst Math Comp Sci & Artificial Intelli, Groningen, Netherlands
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
digital mammography; generalized matrix learning vector quantization; normalized anisotropic quality index;
D O I
10.1117/12.2512975
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
In previous work, we investigated the application of the normalized anisotropic quality index (NAQI) as an image quality metric for digital mammography. The initial assessment showed that NAQI depends not only on radiation dose, but also varies based on image features such as breast anatomy. In this work, these dependencies are analyzed by assessing the contribution of a range of features on NAQI values. The generalized matrix learning vector quantization (GMLVQ) was used to evaluate feature relevance and to rank the imaging parameters and breast features that affect NAQI. The GMLVQ uses prototype vectors to segregate and to analyze the NAQI in three classes: (1) low, (2) medium, and (3) high NAQI values. We used Spearman's correlation coefficient (rho) to compare the results obtained by the GMLVQ method. The GMLVQ was trained using 6,076 clinical mammograms. The statistical analysis showed that NAQI is dependent on several imaging parameters and breast features; in particular, breast area (rho=-0.65), breast density (rho=0.62) and tube current-exposure time product (mAs) (rho=0.56). The GMLVQ results show that the most relevant parameters that affect the NAQI values were breast area (approx. 31%), mAs (approx. 24%) and breast density (approx. 15%). The GMLVQ method allowed us to better understand the NAQI results and provide support for the use of this metric for image quality assessment in digital mammography.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Dose sensitivity of three methods of image quality assessment in digital mammography
    Hummel, Johann
    Kaar, Marcus
    Hoffmann, Rainer
    Kaldarar, Heinrich
    Semturs, Friedrich
    Homolka, Peter
    Figl, Michael
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2012: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2012, 8313
  • [43] Whole-breast digital mammography: Evaluation of clinical image quality
    Feig, SA
    Yaffe, MJ
    Plewes, DB
    Piccaro, MF
    Jong, RA
    RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 : 1300 - 1300
  • [44] Image quality measurements and metrics in full field digital mammography: An overview
    Bosmans, H
    Carton, AK
    Rogge, F
    Zanca, F
    Jacobs, J
    Van Ongeval, C
    Nijs, K
    Van Steen, A
    Marchal, G
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2005, 117 (1-3) : 120 - 130
  • [45] Image quality and compression force: the forgotten link in optimisation of digital mammography?
    D O'Leary
    T Grant
    L Rainford
    Breast Cancer Research, 13
  • [46] Effect of filter on average glandular dose and image quality in digital mammography
    Songsaeng, C.
    Krisanachinda, A.
    Theerakul, K.
    13TH SOUTH-EAST ASIAN CONGRESS OF MEDICAL PHYSICS 2015 (SEACOMP), 2016, 694
  • [47] Image quality and compression force: the forgotten link in optimisation of digital mammography?
    O'Leary, D.
    Grant, T.
    Rainford, L.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 13
  • [48] Comprehensive assessment of image quality in synthetic and digital mammography: a quantitative comparison
    Patrizio Barca
    Rocco Lamastra
    Giacomo Aringhieri
    Raffaele Maria Tucciariello
    Antonio Traino
    Maria Evelina Fantacci
    Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2019, 42 : 1141 - 1152
  • [49] Assessment of automatic exposure control performance in digital mammography using a no-reference anisotropic quality index
    Barufaldi, Bruno
    Borges, Lucas R.
    Bakic, Predrag R.
    Vieira, Marcelo A. C.
    Schiabel, Homero
    Maidment, Andrew D. A.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2017: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2017, 10136
  • [50] Mammography Image Quality Assurance Using Deep Learning
    Kretz, Tobias
    Mueller, Klaus-Robert
    Schaeffter, Tobias
    Elster, Clemens
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 67 (12) : 3317 - 3326