Analysis of feature relevance using an image quality index applied to digital mammography

被引:0
|
作者
Costa, Arthur C. [1 ,3 ]
Barufaldi, Bruno [2 ]
Borges, Lucas R. [1 ]
Biehl, Michael [3 ]
Maidment, Andrew D. A. [2 ]
Vieira, Marcelo A. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Groningen, Bernoulli Inst Math Comp Sci & Artificial Intelli, Groningen, Netherlands
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
digital mammography; generalized matrix learning vector quantization; normalized anisotropic quality index;
D O I
10.1117/12.2512975
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
In previous work, we investigated the application of the normalized anisotropic quality index (NAQI) as an image quality metric for digital mammography. The initial assessment showed that NAQI depends not only on radiation dose, but also varies based on image features such as breast anatomy. In this work, these dependencies are analyzed by assessing the contribution of a range of features on NAQI values. The generalized matrix learning vector quantization (GMLVQ) was used to evaluate feature relevance and to rank the imaging parameters and breast features that affect NAQI. The GMLVQ uses prototype vectors to segregate and to analyze the NAQI in three classes: (1) low, (2) medium, and (3) high NAQI values. We used Spearman's correlation coefficient (rho) to compare the results obtained by the GMLVQ method. The GMLVQ was trained using 6,076 clinical mammograms. The statistical analysis showed that NAQI is dependent on several imaging parameters and breast features; in particular, breast area (rho=-0.65), breast density (rho=0.62) and tube current-exposure time product (mAs) (rho=0.56). The GMLVQ results show that the most relevant parameters that affect the NAQI values were breast area (approx. 31%), mAs (approx. 24%) and breast density (approx. 15%). The GMLVQ method allowed us to better understand the NAQI results and provide support for the use of this metric for image quality assessment in digital mammography.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] On the relevance of modulation transfer function measurements in digital mammography quality control
    Wigati, Kristina T.
    Marshall, Nicholas W.
    Lemmens, Kim
    Binst, Joke
    Jacobs, Annelies
    Cockmartin, Lesley
    Zhang, Guozhi
    Vancoillie, Liesbeth
    Petrov, Dimitar
    Vandenbroucke, Dirk A. N.
    Soejoko, Djarwani S.
    Bosmans, Hilde
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2021, 8 (02)
  • [22] Using a NPWE model observer to assess suitable image quality for a digital mammography quality assurance programme
    Monnin, P.
    Bochud, F. O.
    Verdun, F. R.
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2010, 139 (1-3) : 459 - 462
  • [23] LATIN AMERICAN IMAGE QUALITY SURVEY IN DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY STUDIES
    Mora, Patricia
    Khoury, Helen
    Bitelli, Regina
    Rosa Quintero, Ana
    Garay, Fernando
    Garcia Aguilar, Juan
    Gamarra, Mirtha
    Ubeda, Carlos
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2017, 174 (01) : 94 - 101
  • [24] A statistical alternative to current measures of image quality in digital mammography
    Caldwell, D.
    Baldelli, P.
    Phelan, N.
    Kenny, P.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 67 (03):
  • [25] IMAGE QUALITY CRITERIA APPLIED TO DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY
    BUSCH, HP
    FAULKNER, K
    MALONE, JF
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 1995, 57 (1-4) : 139 - 140
  • [26] Image quality of a prototype direct conversion detector for digital mammography
    Mainprize, JG
    Ford, NL
    Yin, S
    Tümer, T
    Yaffe, MJ
    MEDICAL IMAGING 1999: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1 AND 2, 1999, 3659 : 398 - 406
  • [27] Image Quality and Radiation Dose Assessment of a Digital Mammography System
    Isa, N. M.
    Hassan, W. M. S. W.
    Abdullah, W. A. K. W.
    Othman, F.
    Ramli, A. A. M.
    PROGRESS OF PHYSICS RESEARCH IN MALAYSIA, PERFIK2009, 2010, 1250 : 397 - +
  • [28] Comparison of image quality in contact and magnification modes in digital mammography
    Liu, B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 2014 - 2014
  • [29] Image quality metrics applied to digital pathology
    Jimenez, Ana
    Bueno, Gloria
    Cristobal, Gabriel
    Deniz, Oscar
    Toomey, David
    Conway, Catherine
    OPTICS, PHOTONICS AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMAGING APPLICATIONS IV, 2016, 9896
  • [30] Digital mammography image simulation using Monte Carlo
    Peplow, DE
    Verghese, K
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (03) : 568 - 579