Survival advantage of stentless aortic bioprostheses

被引:85
|
作者
Westaby, S [1 ]
Horton, M [1 ]
Jin, XY [1 ]
Katsumata, T [1 ]
Ahmed, O [1 ]
Saito, S [1 ]
Li, HH [1 ]
Grunkemeier, GL [1 ]
机构
[1] John Radcliffe Hosp, Dept Cardiac Surg, Oxford Heart Ctr, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
来源
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY | 2000年 / 70卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0003-4975(00)01736-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Bioprostheses (BPs) are used to avoid anticoagulation after aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients over 65 years of age. Stentless BPs offer established hemodynamic benefits. We sought to determine whether these advantages translate into improved survival. Methods. Between 1993 and 1997, follow-up data (for Food and Drug Administration submission) were collected prospectively for 160 consecutive, unselected hospital survivors who received the Freestyle valve (FS). Equivalent data were collected for 247 Carpentier-Edwards (CE) porcine xenograft patients. Detailed comparative statistical analysis was used to compare events and survival between the groups. Follow-up was 100% complete for the FS (5.2 years maximum; mean 3.2 +/- 1.0 years) group and 98% (7.2 pears maximum; mean 3.8 +/- 2.0 years) for CE. Results. The groups were well matched in age (FS, 73 +/- 6 years; CE, 74 +/- 6 years), gender (FS, 58% male; CE, 62% male), ventricular function, and number of patients requiring coronary grafts (FS, 41%; CE, 37%). Actuarial survival at 5 years was 84% for FS versus 69% for CE (p = 0.023 Kaplan Meier, p = 0.009 Cox). Annual mortality rates were 3.6% for FS versus 7.1% for CE (p = 0.001). Thromboembolic rate was 0.8% per year for FS and 2.4% for CE (p = 0.024) without a difference in cardiac rhythm. Incidence of nonstructural dysfunction (paravalvular leak) was 0.2% for FS versus 1.3% for CE (p = 0.020). Conclusions. By 5 years, the stentless valve patients had improved survival and reduced adverse events. Though differences in durability are yet to be proved, our findings support the use of stentless bioprostheses in this age group. (Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:785-91) (C) 2000 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:785 / 790
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Stentless Bioprostheses for Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Low Ejection Fraction
    Ennker, Juergen
    Hangleiter, Lena
    Niemann, Bernd
    Pons-Kuehnemann, Joern
    Ennker, Ina C.
    Boening, Andreas
    CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 134 (02) : 229 - 230
  • [22] Midterm outcome after aortic root replacement with stentless porcine bioprostheses
    Ennker, Ina C.
    Albert, Alexander
    Dalladaku, Fatmir
    Rosendahl, Ulrich
    Ennker, Juergen
    Florath, Ines
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2011, 40 (02) : 429 - 434
  • [23] Thrombocytopaenia after aortic valve replacement with stented, stentless and sutureless bioprostheses
    Stanger, Olaf
    Grabherr, Michael
    Gahl, Brigitta
    Longnus, Sarah
    Meinitzer, Andreas
    Fiedler, Martin
    Tevaearai, Hendrik
    Carrel, Thierry
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2017, 51 (02) : 340 - 346
  • [24] Stentless bioprostheses have ideal haemodynamics, even in the small aortic root
    Leo H.B. Baur
    Yvon Houdas
    Kathinka H. Peels
    Jerry Braun
    Bart van Straten
    Alain Prat
    Arie Pieter Kappetein
    Mariken Wolters-Geldoff
    Ernst E. van der Wall
    Albert V.G. Bruschke
    Hans A. Huysmans
    The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging, 2000, 16 : 359 - 364
  • [25] FLEXIBLE AORTIC PROSTHESES - LONG-TERM PERFORMANCE OF STENTLESS PORCINE BIOPROSTHESES AND AORTIC HOMOGRAFTS
    HAUSMANN, B
    NELLESSEN, U
    HOFIG, M
    MAHMOODI, M
    LEYH, R
    SIEVERS, HH
    HEINTZEN, P
    BERNHARDT, A
    SIMON, R
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KARDIOLOGIE, 1991, 80 (01): : 51 - 58
  • [26] Stentless Bioprostheses for Aortic Valve Replacement in Octogenarians: The Influence of Coronary Artery Disease
    Ennker, Juergen
    Zadeh, Behnam
    Pons-Kuehnemann, Joern
    Niemann, Bernd
    Grieshaber, Philippe
    Ennker, Ina C.
    Boening, Andreas
    THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 2018, 66 (04): : 322 - 327
  • [27] Stentless porcine bioprostheses for all types of aortic root pathology - Conference discussion
    Carpentier, A
    Sidiropoulos, A
    Pepper, J
    Palatianos, G
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 1997, 11 (05) : 920 - 921
  • [28] Retrospective clinical analysis of stented vs. stentless porcine aortic bioprostheses
    Vrandecic, M
    Fantini, FA
    Gontijo, B
    de Oliveira, OC
    da Costa, IM
    Vrandecic, E
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2000, 18 (01) : 46 - 53
  • [29] Exercise hemodynamics of aortic prostheses: Comparison between stentless bioprostheses and mechanical valves
    Silberman, S
    Shaheen, J
    Merin, O
    Fink, D
    Shapira, N
    Liviatan-Strauss, N
    Bitran, D
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2001, 72 (04): : 1217 - 1221
  • [30] Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Degenerative Stentless Versus Stented Bioprostheses
    Duncan, Alison
    Moat, Neil
    Simonato, Matheus
    de Weger, Arend
    Kempfert, Jorg
    Eggebrecht, Holger
    Walton, Antony
    Hellig, Farrel
    Kornowski, Ran
    Spargias, Konstantinos
    Mendiz, Oscar
    Makkar, Raj
    Guerrero, Mayra
    Rihal, Charm
    George, Isaac
    Don, Creighton
    Iadanza, Alessandro
    Bapat, Vinayak
    Welsh, Robert
    Wijeysundera, Harindra C.
    Wood, David
    Sathananthan, Janarthanan
    Danenberg, Haim
    Maisano, Francesco
    Garcia, Santiago
    Gafoor, Sameer
    Nombela-Franco, Luis
    Cobiella, Javier
    Dvir, Danny
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 12 (13) : 1256 - 1263