Survival advantage of stentless aortic bioprostheses

被引:85
|
作者
Westaby, S [1 ]
Horton, M [1 ]
Jin, XY [1 ]
Katsumata, T [1 ]
Ahmed, O [1 ]
Saito, S [1 ]
Li, HH [1 ]
Grunkemeier, GL [1 ]
机构
[1] John Radcliffe Hosp, Dept Cardiac Surg, Oxford Heart Ctr, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
来源
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY | 2000年 / 70卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0003-4975(00)01736-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Bioprostheses (BPs) are used to avoid anticoagulation after aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients over 65 years of age. Stentless BPs offer established hemodynamic benefits. We sought to determine whether these advantages translate into improved survival. Methods. Between 1993 and 1997, follow-up data (for Food and Drug Administration submission) were collected prospectively for 160 consecutive, unselected hospital survivors who received the Freestyle valve (FS). Equivalent data were collected for 247 Carpentier-Edwards (CE) porcine xenograft patients. Detailed comparative statistical analysis was used to compare events and survival between the groups. Follow-up was 100% complete for the FS (5.2 years maximum; mean 3.2 +/- 1.0 years) group and 98% (7.2 pears maximum; mean 3.8 +/- 2.0 years) for CE. Results. The groups were well matched in age (FS, 73 +/- 6 years; CE, 74 +/- 6 years), gender (FS, 58% male; CE, 62% male), ventricular function, and number of patients requiring coronary grafts (FS, 41%; CE, 37%). Actuarial survival at 5 years was 84% for FS versus 69% for CE (p = 0.023 Kaplan Meier, p = 0.009 Cox). Annual mortality rates were 3.6% for FS versus 7.1% for CE (p = 0.001). Thromboembolic rate was 0.8% per year for FS and 2.4% for CE (p = 0.024) without a difference in cardiac rhythm. Incidence of nonstructural dysfunction (paravalvular leak) was 0.2% for FS versus 1.3% for CE (p = 0.020). Conclusions. By 5 years, the stentless valve patients had improved survival and reduced adverse events. Though differences in durability are yet to be proved, our findings support the use of stentless bioprostheses in this age group. (Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:785-91) (C) 2000 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:785 / 790
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Four-dimensional flow MRI of stented versus stentless aortic valve bioprostheses
    van Kesteren, Floortje
    Wollersheim, Laurens W.
    Baan, Jan, Jr.
    Nederveen, Aart. J.
    Kaya, Abdullah
    Boekholdt, S. Matthijs
    de Mol, Bas A.
    van Ooij, Pim
    Planken, R. Nils
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (01) : 257 - 264
  • [32] Stented versus stentless bioprostheses in aortic valve stenosis: Effect on left ventricular remodelling
    Tsialtas, Dimitri
    Bolognesi, Roberto
    Beghi, Cesare
    Albertini, Daniela
    Bolognesi, Maria Giulia
    Manca, Carlo
    Gherli, Tiziano
    HEART SURGERY FORUM, 2007, 10 (03): : E205 - E210
  • [33] Stentless vs. stented aortic valve bioprostheses: a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Dunning, J.
    Graham, R. J.
    Thambyrajah, J.
    Stewart, M. J.
    Kendall, S. W. H.
    Hunter, S.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2007, 28 (19) : 2369 - 2374
  • [34] Aortic valve replacement with stented or stentless bioprostheses: A prospective randomized study in elderly patients
    Gerosa, G
    di Marco, F
    Pompei, E
    Guglielmi, C
    Casarotto, D
    CIRCULATION, 1999, 100 (18) : 525 - 525
  • [35] Exercise hemodynamics of aortic prostheses: Comparison between stentless bioprostheses and mechanical valves - Discussion
    Christakis, GT
    Silberman
    Adams, DH
    Kron, I
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2001, 72 (04): : 1221 - 1221
  • [36] Predicted patient outcome after aortic valve replacement with medtronic stentless freestyle bioprostheses
    Kappetein, A. Pieter
    Puvimanasinghe, John P. A.
    Takkenberg, Johanna J. M.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Bogers, Ad J. J. C.
    JOURNAL OF HEART VALVE DISEASE, 2007, 16 (04): : 423 - 428
  • [37] Four-dimensional flow MRI of stented versus stentless aortic valve bioprostheses
    Floortje van Kesteren
    Laurens W. Wollersheim
    Jan Baan
    Aart. J. Nederveen
    Abdullah Kaya
    S. Matthijs Boekholdt
    Bas A. de Mol
    Pim van Ooij
    R. Nils Planken
    European Radiology, 2018, 28 : 257 - 264
  • [38] Stentless Freestyle aortic valve/root bioprostheses: A northern Ontario community hospital perspective
    Mathur, AN
    Hourtovenko, CD
    Baigrie, RS
    Mecci, SU
    Ravi, GD
    Garg, R
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 16 (06) : 747 - 756
  • [39] Structural Valve Deterioration After Aortic Valve Replacement with Medtronic Freestyle Stentless Porcine Aortic Root Bioprostheses
    Nishida, Hidefumi
    Komiya, Tatsuhiko
    Sakaguchi, Genichi
    Shimamoto, Takeshi
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2014, 29 (01) : 22 - 25
  • [40] Hancock versus stentless bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients older than 75 years
    Santini, F
    Bertolini, P
    Montalbano, G
    Vecchi, B
    Pessotto, R
    Prioli, A
    Mazzucco, A
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1998, 66 (06): : S99 - S103