Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Degenerative Stentless Versus Stented Bioprostheses

被引:44
|
作者
Duncan, Alison [1 ]
Moat, Neil [1 ]
Simonato, Matheus [2 ]
de Weger, Arend [3 ]
Kempfert, Jorg [4 ]
Eggebrecht, Holger [5 ]
Walton, Antony [6 ]
Hellig, Farrel [7 ]
Kornowski, Ran [8 ]
Spargias, Konstantinos [9 ]
Mendiz, Oscar [10 ]
Makkar, Raj [11 ]
Guerrero, Mayra [12 ]
Rihal, Charm [12 ]
George, Isaac [13 ]
Don, Creighton [14 ]
Iadanza, Alessandro [15 ]
Bapat, Vinayak [13 ]
Welsh, Robert [16 ]
Wijeysundera, Harindra C. [17 ]
Wood, David [18 ]
Sathananthan, Janarthanan [19 ]
Danenberg, Haim [20 ]
Maisano, Francesco [21 ]
Garcia, Santiago [22 ]
Gafoor, Sameer [23 ]
Nombela-Franco, Luis [24 ]
Cobiella, Javier [24 ]
Dvir, Danny [14 ]
机构
[1] Royal Brompton Hosp, London, England
[2] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Escola Paulista Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Leids Univ, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Deutsch Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[5] Cardioangiol Ctr Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany
[6] Alfred Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Sunninghill Hosp, Johannesburg, South Africa
[8] Rabin Med Ctr, Petah Tiqwa, Israel
[9] Hygeia Hosp, Athens, Greece
[10] Fdn Favaloro, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[11] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[12] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
[13] Columbia Univ, New York, NY USA
[14] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[15] Azienda Osped Univ Senese, Siena, Italy
[16] Univ Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[17] Sunnybrook Med Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[18] Vancouver Gen Hosp, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[19] St Pauls Hosp, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[20] Hadassah Med Ctr, Jerusalem, Israel
[21] Univ Spital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
[22] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA
[23] Swedish Med Ctr, Seattle, WA USA
[24] Hosp Clin San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
关键词
stented bioprostheses; stentless bioprostheses; transcatheter aortic valve replacement; valve-in-valve; CORONARY OBSTRUCTION; IMPLANTATION; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcin.2019.02.036
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES A large comprehensive analysis of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) was performed for failed stentless bioprostheses. BACKGROUND Valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic replacement (TAVR) is an alternative to redo surgery for patients with a failing aortic bioprosthesis. METHODS Unadjusted outcome data were collected from the VIVID (Valve-in-Valve International Data) registry between 2007 and 2016 from a total of 1,598 aortic ViV procedures (291 stentless, 1,307 stented bioprostheses). RESULTS Bioprosthetic failure was secondary to aortic regurgitation in 56% of stentless and 20% stented devices (p < 0.001). ViV-TAVR access was transfemoral in 71.1% stentless and 74.2% stented ViV-TAVR. Self-expanding devices were more frequently used in stentless ViV-TAVR (56.0% vs. 39.9%; p = 0.05), but there was no difference between balloon-expanding and self-expanding TAVR devices for stented ViV-TAVR (48.6% vs. 45.1%). The degree of oversizing for all mechanisms of bioprosthesis failure was 9 +/- 10% for stentless ViV-TAVR vs. 6 +/- 9% for stented ViV-TAVR (and 8 +/- 10% for stentless ViV-TAVR vs. 3 +/- 9% for stented ViV-TAVR in patients with predominant aortic regurgitation; both p < 0.001). Initial device malposition (10.3% vs. 6.2%; p = 0.014), second transcatheter device (7.9% vs. 3.4%), coronary obstruction (6.0% vs. 1.5%), and paravalvular leak occurred more frequently in stentless ViV-TAVR (all p < 0.001). Hospital stay duration (median 7 days) was no different, and 30-day (6.6% vs. 4.4%; p = 0.12) and 1-year mortality year (15.8% vs. 12.6%; p = 0.15) were numerically higher, but not statistically different, after stentless ViV-TAVR. CONCLUSIONS Stentless ViV-TAVR is associated with greater periprocedural complications (initial device malposition, second transcatheter device, coronary obstruction, paravalvular leak), but no difference in 30-day and 1-year outcome. (C) 2019 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:1256 / 1263
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation for degenerative stentless versus stented surgical bioprostheses
    Steul, J.
    Abdel-Wahab, M.
    Stankowski, T.
    Haussig, S.
    Woitek, F.
    Gasior, T.
    Crusius, L.
    Knorr, L.
    Mueller, F.
    Kiefer, P.
    Kappert, U.
    Holzhey, D.
    Linke, A.
    Mangner, N.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2023, 44
  • [2] Randomized trial of stentless versus stented bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement
    Halstead, JC
    Tsui, SS
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2003, 76 (04): : 1338 - 1339
  • [3] Thrombocytopaenia after aortic valve replacement with stented, stentless and sutureless bioprostheses
    Stanger, Olaf
    Grabherr, Michael
    Gahl, Brigitta
    Longnus, Sarah
    Meinitzer, Andreas
    Fiedler, Martin
    Tevaearai, Hendrik
    Carrel, Thierry
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2017, 51 (02) : 340 - 346
  • [4] Stentless Versus Stented Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis
    Yang, Bo
    Makkinejad, Alexander
    Fukuhara, Shinichi
    Clemence, Jeffrey
    Farhat, Linda
    Malik, Aroosa
    Wu, Xiaoting
    Kim, Karen
    Patel, Himanshu
    Deeb, Michael
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2022, 114 (03): : 728 - +
  • [5] Midterm outcomes of subcoronary stentless porcine valve versus stented aortic valve replacement
    Aranda-Michel, Edgar
    Bianco, Valentino
    Dufendach, Keith
    Kilic, Arman
    Habertheuer, Andreas
    Humar, Rishab
    Navid, Forozan
    Wang, Yisi
    Sultan, Ibrahim
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2020, 35 (11) : 2950 - 2956
  • [6] Early Outcomes for Valve-in-valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Degenerative Freestyle Bioprostheses
    Sang, Stephane Leung Wai
    Beute, Tyler
    Heiser, John
    Berkompas, Duane
    Fanning, Justin
    Merhi, William
    SEMINARS IN THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 30 (03) : 262 - 268
  • [7] Aortic valve replacement with stented or stentless bioprostheses: A prospective randomized study in elderly patients
    Gerosa, G
    di Marco, F
    Pompei, E
    Guglielmi, C
    Casarotto, D
    CIRCULATION, 1999, 100 (18) : 525 - 525
  • [8] A comparison of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement in failed stentless versus stented surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves
    Choi, Charles H.
    Cheng, Vivian
    Malaver, Diego
    Kon, Neal
    Kincaid, Edward H.
    Gandhi, Sanjay K.
    Applegate, Robert J.
    Zhao, David X. M.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 93 (06) : 1106 - 1115
  • [9] Stentless vs Stented Aortic Valve Bioprostheses in the Small Aortic Root
    Wollersheim, Laurens W.
    Li, Wilson W.
    Kaya, Abdullah
    Bouma, Berto J.
    Driessen, Antoine H.
    van Boven, Vvim J.
    van der Meulen, Jan
    de Mol, Bas A.
    SEMINARS IN THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 28 (02) : 390 - 397
  • [10] Four-dimensional flow MRI of stented versus stentless aortic valve bioprostheses
    van Kesteren, Floortje
    Wollersheim, Laurens W.
    Baan, Jan, Jr.
    Nederveen, Aart. J.
    Kaya, Abdullah
    Boekholdt, S. Matthijs
    de Mol, Bas A.
    van Ooij, Pim
    Planken, R. Nils
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (01) : 257 - 264