Single-Port Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Short-Term Outcomes and Learning Curve

被引:15
|
作者
Kim, Juliana E. [1 ,2 ]
Kaldany, Alain [1 ,2 ]
Lichtbroun, Benjamin [1 ,2 ]
Singer, Eric A. [1 ,2 ]
Jang, Thomas L. [1 ,2 ]
Ghodoussipour, Saum [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Moses M. [3 ]
Kim, Isaac Y. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers Canc Inst New Jersey, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Sect Urol Oncol, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[2] State Univ New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Dept Surg, Div Urol, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[3] Hoag Hosp, Orange Cty Urol Associates, Irvine, CA USA
[4] Yale Sch Med, Dept Urol, 789 Howard Ave,FMP316, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
prostate cancer; robotic surgery; single-port; case review;
D O I
10.1089/end.2021.0885
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction and Objective: In 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the da Vinci single-port (SP) system, in which four instruments are still utilized, but enter through a single-site access trocar. Herein, we report the largest case series for SP robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) to date. Our primary aim is to analyze the perioperative and short-term outcomes of this procedure. Our secondary aim is an assessment of the learning curve with this new platform. Methods: A total of 157 patients underwent SP RARP by two surgeons who have completed > 3000 multiport robotic surgeries collectively. Institutional Review Board-approved prospectively collected data were used. Basic demographic preoperative variables and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. Results: Median patient age and prostate-specific antigen was 63 years and 6.3 ng/mL before treatment (interquartile range [IQR] 4.7-8.2 ng/mL). Average prostate weight was 47 g. The median operating time was 195 minutes (IQR 165-221.25 minutes) with a median estimated blood loss of 100mL (IQR 100-200 mL). Surgeon 1's operating time stabilized around case #56, and Surgeon 2 around case #26. Surgeon 2 used the transperitoneal approach for the first 7 cases. There were no intraoperative complications. There were six total post-operative complications (3.8%) and four (2.5%) were Clavien-Dindo scale >= IIIa. One hundred ten patients went home same day, 45 stayed 1 night at the hospital, with only 2 patients requiring stay in the hospital for more than 1 night (70%, 29%, and 1% respectively). With the median follow-up period of 9 months, rates of biochemical recurrence, pad-free, and potency preservation were 8.3%, 82.5%, and 64.4%, respectively. Conclusions: This case series confirms the safety and efficacy of SP RARP with acceptable short-term outcomes. There is a significant learning curve for this new modality. Shorter hospital stay appears to be an early benefit of the SP platform.
引用
收藏
页码:1285 / 1289
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ROBOTIC PROSTATECTOMY SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES AND LEARNING CURVE
    Wetherell, D.
    Gyomber, D.
    Jack, G.
    Webb, D.
    Harewood, L.
    Lawrentschuk, N.
    Parker, F.
    Bolton, D. M.
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 9 : 45 - 45
  • [2] Single-port versus multi-port robotic sacrocervicopexy: Establishment Chock for of a learning curve and short-term outcomes
    Lauterbach, Roy
    Mustafa-Mikhail, Susana
    Matanes, Emad
    Amit, Amnon
    Wiener, Zeev
    Lowenstein, Lior
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2019, 239 : 1 - 6
  • [3] COMPARISON OF PERIOPERATIVE AND SHORT-TERM FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES BETWEEN SINGLE-PORT TRANSVESICAL AND MULTI-PORT TRANSPERITONEAL ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Beksac, Alp Tuna
    Abou Zeinab, Mahmoud
    Kaviani, Aaron
    Ferguson, Ethan
    Kaouk, Jihad
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E984 - E984
  • [4] SINGLE-PORT ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    White, Michael A.
    Haber, Georges-Pascal
    Khanna, Rakesh
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Forest, Sylvain
    Stein, Robert J.
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (04): : E188 - E188
  • [5] Single-port laparoscopic versus single-port robotic right hemicolectomy: Postoperative short-term outcomes
    Lim, Ji Ha
    Yun, Seong Hyeon
    Lee, Woo Yong
    Kim, Hee Cheol
    Cho, Yong Beom
    Huh, Jung Wook
    Park, Yoon Ah
    Shin, Jung Kyong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2023, 19 (03):
  • [6] Extraperitoneal single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Short-term outcomes and technique description
    Kwon, Hyeok Jae
    Kang, San
    Rhew, Seung Ah
    Yoon, Chang Eil
    Shin, Dongho
    Bang, Seokhwan
    Moon, Hyong Woo
    Bae, Woong Jin
    Cho, Hyuk Jin
    Ha, U-Syn
    Lee, Ji Youl
    Kim, Sae Woong
    Hong, Sung-Hoo
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2024, 65 (05) : 442 - 450
  • [7] Technical advancements in robotic prostatectomy: single-port extraperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy and single-port transperineal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Aminsharifi, Alireza
    Sawczyn, Guilherme
    Wilson, Clark A.
    Garisto, Juan
    Kaouk, Jihad
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (02) : 848 - 855
  • [8] Outpatient Extraperitoneal Single-Port Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
    Wilson, Clark A.
    Aminsharifi, Alireza
    Sawczyn, Guilherme
    Garisto, Juan D.
    Yau, Roger
    Eltemamy, Mohamed
    Kim, Soodong
    Lenfant, Louis
    Kaouk, Jihad
    UROLOGY, 2020, 144 : 142 - 146
  • [9] Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
    Covas Moschovas, Marcio
    Bhat, Seetharam
    Rogers, Travis
    Noel, Jonathan
    Reddy, Sunil
    Patel, Vipul
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2021, 35 : S93 - S99
  • [10] Comparison of senhance and da vinci robotic radical prostatectomy: short-term outcomes, learning curve, and cost analysis
    Yen-Chun Lin
    Lun-Hsiang Yuan
    Chi-Shin Tseng
    Tsung-Yi Hsieh
    Yu-Wen Huang
    Chao-Yuan Huang
    Shi-Wei Huang
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2024, 27 : 116 - 121