Drivers of the ecosystem services approach in Poland and perception by practitioners

被引:11
|
作者
Stepniewska, Malgorzata [1 ]
Lupa, Piotr [1 ]
Mizgajski, Andrzej [1 ]
机构
[1] Adam Mickiewicz Univ, Fac Geog & Geol Sci, Dept Integrated Geog, Ul Bogumila Krygowskiego 10, PL-61680 Poznan, Poland
关键词
Ecosystem services; Policy making; Implementation; Poland; DECISION-MAKING; GOVERNANCE; CHALLENGES; POLICY; SUPPORT; INFORMATION; LANDSCAPE; SCIENCE; OPPORTUNITIES; REQUIREMENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.08.010
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The uptake of the Ecosystem Services (ES) Approach in Poland with emphasis on the drivers stimulating the research and activity of the authorities, as well as the perception of this approach by the practitioners, are presented in this paper. The study focused on the identification of the stimulus for the activities concerning mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services (MAES). The survey carried out among practitioners allowed to define the main challenges for ES implementation. Two pairs of dichotomic drivers of the MAES process in Poland have been identified: scientific and administrative, as well as international and national. With regard to science, the most important drivers were found to be large international research projects. The inclusion of the ES approach in strategic documents of the European Union was of mobilising importance for the administration. Currently, there is no wider interest in the ES approach at a regional and local level. The results of the survey showed that there is a deficit in knowledge on the practical way of using this approach. In general, it may be said that there is a large potential for the development of ES applications in Poland. Activating it depends on political decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 67
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ECOSYSTEM SERVICES CONCEPT - ECONOMIC APPROACH
    Gradinaru, Giani
    ROMANIAN STATISTICAL REVIEW, 2012, (08) : 63 - 76
  • [32] Ecosystem services management: an integrated approach
    Wang, Shuai
    Fu, Bojie
    Wei, Yongping
    Lyle, Clive
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2013, 5 (01) : 11 - 15
  • [33] A targeted approach to payments for ecosystem services
    Wang, Pu
    Wolf, Steven A.
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2019, 17
  • [34] Risk, reward, and payments for ecosystem services: A portfolio approach to ecosystem services and forestland investment
    Matthies, Brent D.
    Kalliokoski, Tuomo
    Ekholm, Tommi
    Hoen, Hans Fredrik
    Valsta, Lauri T.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2015, 16 : 1 - 12
  • [35] Construction practitioners' perception of key drivers of reputation in mega-construction projects
    Olawale, Oladimeji A.
    Oyedele, Lukumon O.
    Owolabi, Hakeem A.
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 18 (06) : 1571 - 1592
  • [36] Pricing the ecosystem and taxing ecosystem services: A general equilibrium approach
    Eichner, Thomas
    Pethig, Ruediger
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2009, 144 (04) : 1589 - 1616
  • [37] A critical interrogation of the relation between the ecosystem approach and ecosystem services
    De Lucia, Vito
    REVIEW OF EUROPEAN COMPARATIVE & INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, 2018, 27 (02) : 104 - 114
  • [38] Perception of Taxi Services in Oman-A Cross Examination of Citizens' and Taxi Drivers' Perception
    Belwal, Rakesh
    Minhans, Anil
    Al-Balushi, Ali Murad
    JURNAL TEKNOLOGI, 2013, 65 (03):
  • [39] Perception, acquisition and use of ecosystem services: Human behavior, and ecosystem management and policy implications
    Asah, Stanley T.
    Guerry, Anne D.
    Blahna, Dale J.
    Lawler, Joshua J.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2014, 10 : 180 - 186
  • [40] Biogeochemical cycles and biodiversity as key drivers of ecosystem services provided by soils
    Smith, P.
    Cotrufo, M. E.
    Rumpel, C.
    Paustian, K.
    Kuikman, P. J.
    Elliott, J. A.
    McDowell, R.
    Griffiths, R., I
    Asakawa, S.
    Bustamante, M.
    House, J., I
    Sobocka, J.
    Harper, R.
    Pan, G.
    West, P. C.
    Gerber, J. S.
    Clark, J. M.
    Adhya, T.
    Scholes, R. J.
    Scholes, M. C.
    SOIL, 2015, 1 (02) : 665 - 685