A targeted approach to payments for ecosystem services

被引:23
|
作者
Wang, Pu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wolf, Steven A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Sci, 15 Zhongguancun Beiyitiao Alley, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Dev, 15 Zhongguancun Beiyitiao Alley, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[3] Harvard Univ, Belfer Ctr Sci & Int Affairs, John F Kennedy Sch Govt, 79 JFK St, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[4] Cornell Univ, Dept Nat Resources, 111 Fernow Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
Payment for ecosystem services; Willingness to pay; Willingness to accept; Market-based policy instrument; Inequality; Wealth disparity; ENVIRONMENTAL-POLICY; BIODIVERSITY; INNOVATION; PROGRAM; SUPPORT; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00577
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Payment for ecosystem services (PES) is championed as a promising approach for advancing environmental conservation. As part of an ongoing project of refashioning PES intellectually and practically, we introduce a targeted approach to application of the logic of PES. We identify specific circumstances in which PES has potential to be ecologically effective and socially progressive. Specifically, we identify probability for success to increase where there are sharp disparities in the economic and ecological status of ecosystem service providers and beneficiaries. In identifying wealth and ecological disparities as important elements of PES design, we do not naturalize economic stratification in any way. Our aim is to highlight significant limits on the scope of PES and to advance a pragmatic, integrated approach to incentive-based environmental management. These insights can help policy makers and environmental management professionals to advance a more modest, targeted and practical approach to PES. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Payments for ecosystem services as an essential approach to improving ecosystem services: A review
    Yan, Haiming
    Yang, Huicai
    Guo, Xiaonan
    Zhao, Shuqin
    Jiang, Qun'ou
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 201
  • [2] Risk, reward, and payments for ecosystem services: A portfolio approach to ecosystem services and forestland investment
    Matthies, Brent D.
    Kalliokoski, Tuomo
    Ekholm, Tommi
    Hoen, Hans Fredrik
    Valsta, Lauri T.
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2015, 16 : 1 - 12
  • [3] A place-based approach to payments for ecosystem services
    Reed, M. S.
    Allen, K.
    Attlee, A.
    Dougill, A. J.
    Evans, K. L.
    Kenter, J. O.
    Hoy, J.
    McNab, D.
    Stead, S. M.
    Twyman, C.
    Scott, A. S.
    Smyth, M. A.
    Stringer, L. C.
    Whittingham, M. J.
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2017, 43 : 92 - 106
  • [4] Payments for ecosystem services in Indonesia
    Suich, Helen
    Lugina, Mega
    Muttaqin, Muhammad Zahrul
    Alviya, Iis
    Sari, Galih Kartika
    [J]. ORYX, 2017, 51 (03) : 489 - 497
  • [5] Estimating residents' WTP for ecosystem services improvement in a payments for ecosystem services (PES) program: A choice experiment approach
    Ureta, J. Carl
    Motallebi, Marzieh
    Vassalos, Michael
    Seagle, Steven
    Baldwin, Robert
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 201
  • [6] Community conservation and a two-stage approach to payments for ecosystem services
    Cranford, Matthew
    Mourato, Susana
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 71 : 89 - 98
  • [7] Payments for Ecosystem Services—the Case of Forests
    Irina Prokofieva
    [J]. Current Forestry Reports, 2016, 2 : 130 - 142
  • [8] The promise and perils of payments for ecosystem services
    Salzman, Jim
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 1 (1-2) : 5 - 20
  • [9] A zoological perspective on payments for ecosystem services
    McNeely, Jeffrey A.
    [J]. INTEGRATIVE ZOOLOGY, 2007, 2 (02): : 68 - 78
  • [10] Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism
    Kosoy, Nicolas
    Corbera, Esteve
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (06) : 1228 - 1236