Risk, reward, and payments for ecosystem services: A portfolio approach to ecosystem services and forestland investment

被引:35
|
作者
Matthies, Brent D. [1 ]
Kalliokoski, Tuomo [1 ]
Ekholm, Tommi [2 ]
Hoen, Hans Fredrik [3 ]
Valsta, Lauri T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Forest Sci, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[2] VTT Tech Res Ctr Finland, FI-02044 Espoo, Vtt, Finland
[3] Norwegian Univ Life Sci NMBU, N-1432 As, Norway
关键词
Payment for ecosystem services; Modern portfolio theory; Forestland; Risk; Investment; CONSERVATION PAYMENTS; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; STOCHASTIC-DOMINANCE; DESIGNING PAYMENTS; MIXED FORESTS; BIODIVERSITY; MANAGEMENT; TIMBER; LAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.08.006
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This study examines the risks and returns associated with payments for ecosystem services (PES) for private forestland using modern portfolio theory. PES schemes for biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation were considered. Pricing data for European carbon emissions offsets and the Finnish biodiversity conservation scheme Trading in Natural Values', and Finnish forest inventory data were used to model ex-post empirical results. The forest owner's portfolio could be comprised of either current forest management or a PES scheme with postponed harvesting; considerations for investing harvest income in equities and bonds were included. The correlation between a PES scheme's return series and timber returns was higher for the biodiversity scheme leading to relatively limited financial diversification benefits under current prices. Increasing the biodiversity conservation price level reduced this effect. For the climate scheme, removing the declining linear trend from the pricing data did not reduce the relatively greater diversification benefits. Overall these benefits were also greater on fertile forest site types than lower quality sites. These results indicate that the policy implications of designing socially efficient PES pricing include an important trade-off between increasing price risks for private landowners and decreasing marginal costs for society. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Payments for ecosystem services as an essential approach to improving ecosystem services: A review
    Yan, Haiming
    Yang, Huicai
    Guo, Xiaonan
    Zhao, Shuqin
    Jiang, Qun'ou
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 201
  • [2] A targeted approach to payments for ecosystem services
    Wang, Pu
    Wolf, Steven A.
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2019, 17
  • [3] Payments for ecosystem services in Indonesia
    Suich, Helen
    Lugina, Mega
    Muttaqin, Muhammad Zahrul
    Alviya, Iis
    Sari, Galih Kartika
    [J]. ORYX, 2017, 51 (03) : 489 - 497
  • [4] A place-based approach to payments for ecosystem services
    Reed, M. S.
    Allen, K.
    Attlee, A.
    Dougill, A. J.
    Evans, K. L.
    Kenter, J. O.
    Hoy, J.
    McNab, D.
    Stead, S. M.
    Twyman, C.
    Scott, A. S.
    Smyth, M. A.
    Stringer, L. C.
    Whittingham, M. J.
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2017, 43 : 92 - 106
  • [5] Estimating residents' WTP for ecosystem services improvement in a payments for ecosystem services (PES) program: A choice experiment approach
    Ureta, J. Carl
    Motallebi, Marzieh
    Vassalos, Michael
    Seagle, Steven
    Baldwin, Robert
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 201
  • [6] Linking social norms to efficient conservation investment in payments for ecosystem services
    Chen, Xiaodong
    Lupi, Frank
    He, Guangming
    Liu, Jianguo
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (28) : 11812 - 11817
  • [7] The promise and perils of payments for ecosystem services
    Salzman, Jim
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 1 (1-2) : 5 - 20
  • [8] A zoological perspective on payments for ecosystem services
    McNeely, Jeffrey A.
    [J]. INTEGRATIVE ZOOLOGY, 2007, 2 (02): : 68 - 78
  • [9] Payments for Ecosystem Services—the Case of Forests
    Irina Prokofieva
    [J]. Current Forestry Reports, 2016, 2 : 130 - 142
  • [10] Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism
    Kosoy, Nicolas
    Corbera, Esteve
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (06) : 1228 - 1236