Risk, reward, and payments for ecosystem services: A portfolio approach to ecosystem services and forestland investment

被引:35
|
作者
Matthies, Brent D. [1 ]
Kalliokoski, Tuomo [1 ]
Ekholm, Tommi [2 ]
Hoen, Hans Fredrik [3 ]
Valsta, Lauri T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Forest Sci, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[2] VTT Tech Res Ctr Finland, FI-02044 Espoo, Vtt, Finland
[3] Norwegian Univ Life Sci NMBU, N-1432 As, Norway
关键词
Payment for ecosystem services; Modern portfolio theory; Forestland; Risk; Investment; CONSERVATION PAYMENTS; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; STOCHASTIC-DOMINANCE; DESIGNING PAYMENTS; MIXED FORESTS; BIODIVERSITY; MANAGEMENT; TIMBER; LAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.08.006
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This study examines the risks and returns associated with payments for ecosystem services (PES) for private forestland using modern portfolio theory. PES schemes for biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation were considered. Pricing data for European carbon emissions offsets and the Finnish biodiversity conservation scheme Trading in Natural Values', and Finnish forest inventory data were used to model ex-post empirical results. The forest owner's portfolio could be comprised of either current forest management or a PES scheme with postponed harvesting; considerations for investing harvest income in equities and bonds were included. The correlation between a PES scheme's return series and timber returns was higher for the biodiversity scheme leading to relatively limited financial diversification benefits under current prices. Increasing the biodiversity conservation price level reduced this effect. For the climate scheme, removing the declining linear trend from the pricing data did not reduce the relatively greater diversification benefits. Overall these benefits were also greater on fertile forest site types than lower quality sites. These results indicate that the policy implications of designing socially efficient PES pricing include an important trade-off between increasing price risks for private landowners and decreasing marginal costs for society. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Community conservation and a two-stage approach to payments for ecosystem services
    Cranford, Matthew
    Mourato, Susana
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 71 : 89 - 98
  • [32] Risk and Markets for Ecosystem Services
    BenDor, Todd K.
    Riggsbee, J. Adam
    Doyle, Martin
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 45 (24) : 10322 - 10330
  • [33] THE ECOSYSTEM APPROACH TO FORESTLAND MANAGEMENT
    ROWE, JS
    [J]. FORESTRY CHRONICLE, 1992, 68 (02): : 222 - 224
  • [34] Beyond carbon: Conceptualizing payments for ecosystem services in blue forests on carbon and other marine and coastal ecosystem services
    Lau, Winnie W. Y.
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 83 : 5 - 14
  • [35] Payments for Ecosystem Services in the Context of Adaptation to Climate Change
    van de Sand, Isabel
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2012, 17 (01):
  • [36] Impact of ecological risk and ecosystem health on ecosystem services
    Zhu, Qing
    Cai, Yongli
    [J]. Dili Xuebao/Acta Geographica Sinica, 2024, 79 (05): : 1303 - 1317
  • [37] Problematizing REDD+ as an experiment in payments for ecosystem services
    Corbera, Esteve
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2012, 4 (06) : 612 - 619
  • [38] Feedback of telecoupling: the case of a payments for ecosystem services program
    Yang, Hongbo
    Lupi, Frank
    Zhang, Jindong
    Chen, Xiaodong
    Liu, Jianguo
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2018, 23 (02):
  • [39] Payments for ecosystem services and the financing of global biodiversity conservation
    Hein, Lars
    Miller, Daniel C.
    de Groot, Rudolf
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2013, 5 (01) : 87 - 93
  • [40] Troubled Encounters: Payments for Ecosystem Services in Chiapas, Mexico
    Corbera, Esteve
    Costedoat, Sebastien
    Ezzine-de-Blas, Driss
    Van Hecken, Gert
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 2020, 51 (01) : 167 - 195