Fidelity to an evidence-based model for crisis resolution teams: a cross-sectional multicentre study in Norway

被引:11
|
作者
Hasselberg, N. [1 ]
Holgersen, K. H. [2 ]
Uverud, G. M. [3 ]
Siqveland, J. [1 ,4 ]
Lloyd-Evans, B. [5 ]
Johnson, S. [5 ]
Ruud, T. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Akershus Univ Hosp, Div Mental Hlth Serv, Lorenskog, Norway
[2] St Olavs Hosp, Dept Mental Hlth, Tiller Community Mental Hlth Ctr, Trondheim, Norway
[3] Univ South Eastern Norway, Vestfold, Norway
[4] Univ Oslo, Natl Ctr Suicide Res & Prevent, Oslo, Norway
[5] UCL, Div Psychiat, London, England
[6] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Crisis resolution teams; Acute; Emergency; Implementation; Fidelity scale; MENTAL-HEALTH CRISIS; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12888-021-03237-8
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background Crisis resolution teams (CRTs) are specialized multidisciplinary teams intended to provide assessment and short-term outpatient or home treatment as an alternative to hospital admission for people experiencing a mental health crisis. In Norway, CRTs have been established within mental health services throughout the country, but their fidelity to an evidence-based model for CRTs has been unknown. Methods We assessed fidelity to the evidence-based CRT model for 28 CRTs, using the CORE Crisis Resolution Team Fidelity Scale Version 2, a tool developed and first applied in the UK to measure adherence to a model of optimal CRT practice. The assessments were completed by evaluation teams based on written information, interviews, and review of patient records during a one-day visit with each CRT. Results The fidelity scale was applicable for assessing fidelity of Norwegian CRTs to the CRT model. On a scale 1 to 5, the mean fidelity score was low (2.75) and with a moderate variation of fidelity across the teams. The CRTs had highest scores on the content and delivery of care subscale, and lowest on the location and timing of care subscale. Scores were high on items measuring comprehensive assessment, psychological interventions, visit length, service users' choice of location, and of type of support. However, scores were low on opening hours, gatekeeping acute psychiatric beds, facilitating early hospital discharge, intensity of contact, providing medication, and providing practical support. Conclusions The CORE CRT Fidelity Scale was applicable and relevant to assessment of Norwegian CRTs and may be used to guide further development in clinical practice and research. Lower fidelity and differences in fidelity patterns compared to the UK teams may indicate that Norwegian teams are more focused on early interventions to a broader patient group and less on avoiding acute inpatient admissions for patients with severe mental illness.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Barriers to implementing nursing evidence-based practice at the Palestinian Medical Complex: A cross-sectional study
    Khaled, Hamdallah H.
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY MEDICINE AND PRIMARY CARE, 2024, 13 (11) : 5113 - 5120
  • [42] Evidence-based practice in undergraduate physiotherapy programs in Brazil: A cross-sectional document analysis study
    Monteiro, Nivea Renata Oliveira
    Nascimento Santos, Wueyla Nicoly
    Sousa, Andre Silva
    Ohara, Daniela Goncalves
    Pegorari, Maycon Sousa
    Matos, Areolino Pena
    PHYSIOTHERAPY RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 29 (01)
  • [43] Validation of the Evidence-Based Practice Competence Questionnaire for Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study in Greece
    Patelarou, Athina
    Schetaki, Stefania
    Giakoumidakis, Konstantinos
    Lialiou, Paschalina
    Patelarou, Evridiki
    NURSING REPORTS, 2021, 11 (04) : 765 - 774
  • [44] Evidence-based practice among health professionals in hospitals of Northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study
    Beshir, Miftah A.
    Woreta, Solomon A.
    Kebede, Mihiretu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHCARE, 2017, 15 (04) : 161 - 170
  • [45] Adherence to and influencing factors of evidence-based practice in physiotherapeutic care in Germany: a cross-sectional study
    Braun, Tobias
    Ehrenbrusthoff, Katja
    Bahns, Carolin
    Happe, Lisa
    Kopkow, Christian
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2022, 168 : 8 - 20
  • [46] Correction to: Hospital organizational context and delivery of evidence-based stroke care: a cross-sectional study
    Nadine E. Andrew
    Sandy Middleton
    Rohan Grimley
    Craig S. Anderson
    Geoffrey A. Donnan
    Natasha A. Lannin
    Enna Stroil-Salama
    Brenda Grabsch
    Monique F. Kilkenny
    Janet E. Squires
    Dominique A. Cadilhac
    Implementation Science, 14
  • [47] Investigation of Senior Nursing Students' Attitudes Toward Evidence-Based Practices: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Erol, Ahmet
    Zaybak, Ayten
    Khorshid, Leyla
    JOURNAL OF NURSOLOGY, 2022, 25 (02): : 84 - 88
  • [48] Climates and associated factors for evidence-based practice implementation among nurses: a cross-sectional study
    Zhang, Xinyue
    Peng, Mengting
    He, Mei
    Du, Meijie
    Jiang, Mengyao
    Cui, Mengying
    Cai, Yue
    Yan, Qi
    Wang, Ying
    BMC NURSING, 2024, 23 (01)
  • [49] Evidence-based practice beliefs and implementations: a cross-sectional study among undergraduate nursing students
    Abu-Baker, Nesrin N.
    AbuAlrub, Salwa
    Obeidat, Rana F.
    Assmairan, Kholoud
    BMC NURSING, 2021, 20 (01)
  • [50] Articaine: dental practitioner use, basis of perception and evidence-based dentistry—a cross-sectional study
    Erica Martin
    Andrew Lee
    Ernest Jennings
    BDJ Open, 8