Fidelity to an evidence-based model for crisis resolution teams: a cross-sectional multicentre study in Norway

被引:11
|
作者
Hasselberg, N. [1 ]
Holgersen, K. H. [2 ]
Uverud, G. M. [3 ]
Siqveland, J. [1 ,4 ]
Lloyd-Evans, B. [5 ]
Johnson, S. [5 ]
Ruud, T. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Akershus Univ Hosp, Div Mental Hlth Serv, Lorenskog, Norway
[2] St Olavs Hosp, Dept Mental Hlth, Tiller Community Mental Hlth Ctr, Trondheim, Norway
[3] Univ South Eastern Norway, Vestfold, Norway
[4] Univ Oslo, Natl Ctr Suicide Res & Prevent, Oslo, Norway
[5] UCL, Div Psychiat, London, England
[6] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Crisis resolution teams; Acute; Emergency; Implementation; Fidelity scale; MENTAL-HEALTH CRISIS; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12888-021-03237-8
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background Crisis resolution teams (CRTs) are specialized multidisciplinary teams intended to provide assessment and short-term outpatient or home treatment as an alternative to hospital admission for people experiencing a mental health crisis. In Norway, CRTs have been established within mental health services throughout the country, but their fidelity to an evidence-based model for CRTs has been unknown. Methods We assessed fidelity to the evidence-based CRT model for 28 CRTs, using the CORE Crisis Resolution Team Fidelity Scale Version 2, a tool developed and first applied in the UK to measure adherence to a model of optimal CRT practice. The assessments were completed by evaluation teams based on written information, interviews, and review of patient records during a one-day visit with each CRT. Results The fidelity scale was applicable for assessing fidelity of Norwegian CRTs to the CRT model. On a scale 1 to 5, the mean fidelity score was low (2.75) and with a moderate variation of fidelity across the teams. The CRTs had highest scores on the content and delivery of care subscale, and lowest on the location and timing of care subscale. Scores were high on items measuring comprehensive assessment, psychological interventions, visit length, service users' choice of location, and of type of support. However, scores were low on opening hours, gatekeeping acute psychiatric beds, facilitating early hospital discharge, intensity of contact, providing medication, and providing practical support. Conclusions The CORE CRT Fidelity Scale was applicable and relevant to assessment of Norwegian CRTs and may be used to guide further development in clinical practice and research. Lower fidelity and differences in fidelity patterns compared to the UK teams may indicate that Norwegian teams are more focused on early interventions to a broader patient group and less on avoiding acute inpatient admissions for patients with severe mental illness.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Effect of Perceptions of Evidence-Based Practice on Endotracheal Cuff Pressure Management in Critical Care Nurses: A Correlational Cross-Sectional Multicentre Study
    Erturk, Elif Budak
    Cevik, Banu
    Kilic, Gulsen
    Celikates, Nevin
    Fulser, Berrak
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2024,
  • [22] Mediating Role of Evidence-Based Nursing Competence Between Specialist Nurses' Information Literacy and Innovative Behaviour: A Multicentre Cross-Sectional Study
    Wang, Zeen
    Wen, Na
    Ren, Yuanpeng
    Liang, Wei
    Ding, Yaping
    Ji, Minghui
    Xu, Min
    Chen, Chunyan
    Song, Yan
    Chen, Xian
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2024,
  • [23] A multicentre cross-sectional observational study of cancer multidisciplinary teams: Analysis of team decision making
    Soukup, Tayana
    Lamb, Benjamin W.
    Morbi, Abigail
    Shah, Nisha J.
    Bali, Anish
    Asher, Viren
    Gandamihardja, Tasha
    Giordano, Pascale
    Darzi, Ara
    Green, James S. A.
    Sevdalis, Nick
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (19): : 7083 - 7099
  • [24] The effect of nurses’ perceptions of evidence-based attitudes on the quality of care: a cross-sectional study
    Mustafa Durmuş
    Necmettin Çiftci
    Metin Yildiz
    Oktay Ferdi Yildiz
    BMC Nursing, 24 (1)
  • [25] Hospital organizational context and delivery of evidence-based stroke care: a cross-sectional study
    Nadine E. Andrew
    Sandy Middleton
    Rohan Grimley
    Craig S. Anderson
    Geoffrey A. Donnan
    Natasha A. Lannin
    Enna Stroil-Salama
    Brenda Grabsch
    Monique F. Kilkenny
    Janet E. Squires
    Dominique A. Cadilhac
    Implementation Science, 14
  • [26] Factors contributing to evidence-based pressure ulcer prevention. A cross-sectional study
    Sving, Eva
    Idvall, Ewa
    Hogberg, Hans
    Gunningberg, Lena
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2014, 51 (05) : 717 - 725
  • [27] The readiness of hospital pharmacists in Kuwait to practise evidence-based medicine: a cross-sectional study
    Ali Jasem Buabbas
    Fatemah Mohammad Alsaleh
    Hamza Mohamad Al-Shawaf
    Ali Abdullah
    Abdullah Almajran
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 18
  • [28] Attitudes and Adherence to Evidence-based Practice of Physiotherapists Working in Brandenburg A Cross-sectional Study
    Spiess, Pauline-Marie
    Bahns, Carolin
    Kopkow, Christian
    PHYSIOSCIENCE, 2024, 20 (01) : 22 - 32
  • [29] Adherence to evidence-based guidelines for indwelling urinary catheter management: A cross-sectional study
    Coventry, Linda L.
    Patton, Vicki
    Whyte, Ashleigh
    Liu, Xiaohua
    Kaur, Hardeep
    Job, Adina
    King, Mary
    COLLEGIAN, 2021, 28 (05) : 515 - 520
  • [30] Effect of evidence-based nursing practices on individualised care: A cross-sectional descriptive study
    Ozdemir, Cevriye
    Sendir, Merdiye
    Eren, Rabia
    Bakir, Gizem Kubat
    Kizil, Hamiyet
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2025, 31 (01)