Fidelity to an evidence-based model for crisis resolution teams: a cross-sectional multicentre study in Norway

被引:11
|
作者
Hasselberg, N. [1 ]
Holgersen, K. H. [2 ]
Uverud, G. M. [3 ]
Siqveland, J. [1 ,4 ]
Lloyd-Evans, B. [5 ]
Johnson, S. [5 ]
Ruud, T. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Akershus Univ Hosp, Div Mental Hlth Serv, Lorenskog, Norway
[2] St Olavs Hosp, Dept Mental Hlth, Tiller Community Mental Hlth Ctr, Trondheim, Norway
[3] Univ South Eastern Norway, Vestfold, Norway
[4] Univ Oslo, Natl Ctr Suicide Res & Prevent, Oslo, Norway
[5] UCL, Div Psychiat, London, England
[6] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Crisis resolution teams; Acute; Emergency; Implementation; Fidelity scale; MENTAL-HEALTH CRISIS; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12888-021-03237-8
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background Crisis resolution teams (CRTs) are specialized multidisciplinary teams intended to provide assessment and short-term outpatient or home treatment as an alternative to hospital admission for people experiencing a mental health crisis. In Norway, CRTs have been established within mental health services throughout the country, but their fidelity to an evidence-based model for CRTs has been unknown. Methods We assessed fidelity to the evidence-based CRT model for 28 CRTs, using the CORE Crisis Resolution Team Fidelity Scale Version 2, a tool developed and first applied in the UK to measure adherence to a model of optimal CRT practice. The assessments were completed by evaluation teams based on written information, interviews, and review of patient records during a one-day visit with each CRT. Results The fidelity scale was applicable for assessing fidelity of Norwegian CRTs to the CRT model. On a scale 1 to 5, the mean fidelity score was low (2.75) and with a moderate variation of fidelity across the teams. The CRTs had highest scores on the content and delivery of care subscale, and lowest on the location and timing of care subscale. Scores were high on items measuring comprehensive assessment, psychological interventions, visit length, service users' choice of location, and of type of support. However, scores were low on opening hours, gatekeeping acute psychiatric beds, facilitating early hospital discharge, intensity of contact, providing medication, and providing practical support. Conclusions The CORE CRT Fidelity Scale was applicable and relevant to assessment of Norwegian CRTs and may be used to guide further development in clinical practice and research. Lower fidelity and differences in fidelity patterns compared to the UK teams may indicate that Norwegian teams are more focused on early interventions to a broader patient group and less on avoiding acute inpatient admissions for patients with severe mental illness.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Nursing managers' perspectives on facilitators of and barriers to evidence-based practice: A cross-sectional study
    Hosseini-Moghaddam, Fatemeh
    Mohammadpour, Ali
    Bahri, Narjes
    Mojalli, Mohamad
    NURSING OPEN, 2023, 10 (09): : 6237 - 6247
  • [32] Norwegian Physicians' Knowledge of and Opinions about Evidence-Based Medicine: Cross-Sectional Study
    Ulvenes, Lidziya Vanahel
    Aasland, Olaf
    Nylenna, Magne
    Kristiansen, Ivar Sonbo
    PLOS ONE, 2009, 4 (11):
  • [33] Evidence-Based Physiotherapy Practice in Paediatric Subdiscipline: A Cross-Sectional Study in Saudi Arabia
    Alghadier, Mshari
    Elnaggar, Ragab K. K.
    Alasraj, Muneera L. I.
    Khan, Najwa
    Almeiman, Aseil
    Albesher, Reem
    HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (11)
  • [34] The readiness of hospital pharmacists in Kuwait to practise evidence-based medicine: a cross-sectional study
    Buabbas, Ali Jasem
    Alsaleh, Fatemah Mohammad
    Al-Shawaf, Hamza Mohamad
    Abdullah, Ali
    Almajran, Abdullah
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2018, 18
  • [35] Hospital organizational context and delivery of evidence-based stroke care: a cross-sectional study
    Andrew, Nadine E.
    Middleton, Sandy
    Grimley, Rohan
    Anderson, Craig S.
    Donnan, Geoffrey A.
    Lannin, Natasha A.
    Striol-Salama, Enna
    Grabsch, Brenda
    Kilkenny, Monique F.
    Squires, Janet E.
    Cadilhac, Dominique A.
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2019, 14 (1)
  • [36] Evidence-based healthcare competence of social- and healthcare educators: A cross-sectional study
    Immonen, Kati
    Tuomikoski, Anna-Maria
    Mikkonen, Kristina
    Oikarinen, Anne
    Ylimaeki, Saija
    Parisod, Heidi
    Mattila, Outi
    Kaeaeriaeinen, Maria
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2025, 81 (01) : 300 - 315
  • [37] Patient experiences with peripherally inserted venous catheters- A cross-sectional, multicentre study in Norway
    Leonardsen, Ann-Chatrin Linqvist
    Lunde, Ellen Marie
    Smith, Stine Thorvaldsen
    Olsen, Gitte Lise
    NURSING OPEN, 2020, 7 (03): : 760 - 767
  • [38] Development of an Evidence-Based Best Practice Model for Teams Managing Crisis in Dementia: Protocol for a Qualitative Study
    Stanyon, Miriam
    Streater, Amy
    Coleston-Shields, Donna Maria
    Yates, Jennifer
    Challis, David
    Dening, Tom
    Hoe, Juanita
    Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor
    Mitchell, Shirley
    Moniz-Cook, Esme
    Poland, Fiona
    Prothero, David
    Orrell, Martin
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2021, 10 (01):
  • [39] OTs' Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice (EBP): A Cross-Sectional Survey
    Krueger, Robert
    Sweetman, Melissa
    Martin, Malissa
    Cappaert, Thomas
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2020, 74 (04):
  • [40] Evidence-based medicine use in pharmacy practice: a cross-sectional survey
    Abu Farha, Rana
    Alefishat, Eman
    Suyagh, Maysa
    Elayeh, Eman
    Mayyas, Amal
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2014, 20 (06) : 786 - 792