Fidelity to an evidence-based model for crisis resolution teams: a cross-sectional multicentre study in Norway

被引:11
|
作者
Hasselberg, N. [1 ]
Holgersen, K. H. [2 ]
Uverud, G. M. [3 ]
Siqveland, J. [1 ,4 ]
Lloyd-Evans, B. [5 ]
Johnson, S. [5 ]
Ruud, T. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Akershus Univ Hosp, Div Mental Hlth Serv, Lorenskog, Norway
[2] St Olavs Hosp, Dept Mental Hlth, Tiller Community Mental Hlth Ctr, Trondheim, Norway
[3] Univ South Eastern Norway, Vestfold, Norway
[4] Univ Oslo, Natl Ctr Suicide Res & Prevent, Oslo, Norway
[5] UCL, Div Psychiat, London, England
[6] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Crisis resolution teams; Acute; Emergency; Implementation; Fidelity scale; MENTAL-HEALTH CRISIS; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12888-021-03237-8
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background Crisis resolution teams (CRTs) are specialized multidisciplinary teams intended to provide assessment and short-term outpatient or home treatment as an alternative to hospital admission for people experiencing a mental health crisis. In Norway, CRTs have been established within mental health services throughout the country, but their fidelity to an evidence-based model for CRTs has been unknown. Methods We assessed fidelity to the evidence-based CRT model for 28 CRTs, using the CORE Crisis Resolution Team Fidelity Scale Version 2, a tool developed and first applied in the UK to measure adherence to a model of optimal CRT practice. The assessments were completed by evaluation teams based on written information, interviews, and review of patient records during a one-day visit with each CRT. Results The fidelity scale was applicable for assessing fidelity of Norwegian CRTs to the CRT model. On a scale 1 to 5, the mean fidelity score was low (2.75) and with a moderate variation of fidelity across the teams. The CRTs had highest scores on the content and delivery of care subscale, and lowest on the location and timing of care subscale. Scores were high on items measuring comprehensive assessment, psychological interventions, visit length, service users' choice of location, and of type of support. However, scores were low on opening hours, gatekeeping acute psychiatric beds, facilitating early hospital discharge, intensity of contact, providing medication, and providing practical support. Conclusions The CORE CRT Fidelity Scale was applicable and relevant to assessment of Norwegian CRTs and may be used to guide further development in clinical practice and research. Lower fidelity and differences in fidelity patterns compared to the UK teams may indicate that Norwegian teams are more focused on early interventions to a broader patient group and less on avoiding acute inpatient admissions for patients with severe mental illness.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fidelity to an evidence-based model for crisis resolution teams: a cross-sectional multicentre study in Norway
    N. Hasselberg
    K. H. Holgersen
    G. M. Uverud
    J. Siqveland
    B. Lloyd-Evans
    S. Johnson
    T. Ruud
    BMC Psychiatry, 21
  • [2] Psychiatric admissions from crisis resolution teams in Norway: a prospective multicentre study
    Hasselberg, Nina
    Grawe, Rolf W.
    Johnson, Sonia
    Saltyte-Benth, Jurate
    Ruud, Torleif
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 13
  • [3] Psychiatric admissions from crisis resolution teams in Norway: a prospective multicentre study
    Nina Hasselberg
    Rolf W Gråwe
    Sonia Johnson
    Jūratė Šaltytė-Benth
    Torleif Ruud
    BMC Psychiatry, 13
  • [4] Commitment, perception and evidence-based practice training in Spanish nursing students: A multicentre cross-sectional study
    Gomez-Salgado, Juan
    Rodriguez-Almagro, Julian
    Molina-Alarcon, Milagros
    Miguel Martinez-Galiano, Juan
    del Carmen Solano-Ruiz, Maria
    Hernandez Martinez, Antonio
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2023, 32 (5-6) : 715 - 725
  • [5] An implementation study of the crisis resolution team model in Norway: Are the crisis resolution teams fulfilling their role?
    Nina Hasselberg
    Rolf W Gråwe
    Sonia Johnson
    Torleif Ruud
    BMC Health Services Research, 11
  • [6] An implementation study of the crisis resolution team model in Norway: Are the crisis resolution teams fulfilling their role?
    Hasselberg, Nina
    Grawe, Rolf W.
    Johnson, Sonia
    Ruud, Torleif
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2011, 11
  • [7] Assessing nursing students' knowledge of evidence-based guidelines on the management of peripheral venous catheters: A multicentre cross-sectional study
    Simonetti, Valentina
    Comparcini, Dania
    Miniscalco, Davide
    Tirabassi, Rita
    Di Giovanni, Pamela
    Cicolini, Giancarlo
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2019, 73 : 77 - 82
  • [8] Clinical applicability of evidence-based orthopedics - A cross-sectional study of the quality of orthopedic evidence
    Vavken, P.
    Culen, G.
    Dorotka, R.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND UNFALLCHIRURGIE, 2008, 146 (01): : 21 - 25
  • [9] Evidence-based cardiovascular care in the community: A population-based cross-sectional study
    Putnam W.
    Burge F.I.
    Lawson B.
    Cox J.L.
    Sketris I.
    Flowerdew G.
    Zitner D.
    BMC Family Practice, 5 (1) : 1 - 23
  • [10] Validity and reliability of the Noor Evidence-Based Medicine Questionnaire: A cross-sectional study
    Norhayati, Mohd Noor
    Nawi, Zanaridah Mat
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (04):