Integrated evaluation of payments for ecosystem services programs in China: a systematic review

被引:23
|
作者
Yang, Wu [1 ]
Lu, Qiaoling [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Coll Environm & Resource Sci, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
PROTECTED AREAS; REGIONAL PAYMENT; EFFICIENCY; DEFORESTATION; BIODIVERSITY; RESTORATION; INVESTMENTS; POVERTY; BASIN;
D O I
10.1080/20964129.2018.1459867
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Introduction: During the past two decades, payments for ecosystem services (PES) program has become a popular conservation paradigm for realigning socioeconomic costs and benefits among different stakeholders. As billions of investment flows into the natural capital pool, there is growing interest to understand the ecological, economic, and social outcomes of PES programs. China is one of the countries that extensively implements PES programs. Although there is a growing interest to perform impact evaluation of China's massive PES programs, it is unclear that what existing literature has done, has not done, and should do in the future. Therefore, to guide further research and practices, we conduct a systematic review of studies on China's PES programs. Results: Our review shows that there are growing impact evaluation studies of PES programs in China. However, the spatial and ecosystem distributions of existing studies are quite uneven. Most case studies were poorly designed, rarely quantified, and evaluated without sophisticated methods. Among the three dimensions of ecological effectiveness, economic efficiency, and social equity, economic efficiency is the least studied. Discussion and Conclusion: We further discuss the challenges and opportunities and provide insights for future research. To improve the understanding and management of natural capital, we call for mainstreaming impact evaluation of ecosystem service policies in China and beyond following the state-of-art procedures.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:73 / 84
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The promise and perils of payments for ecosystem services
    Salzman, Jim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 1 (1-2) : 5 - 20
  • [32] A zoological perspective on payments for ecosystem services
    McNeely, Jeffrey A.
    INTEGRATIVE ZOOLOGY, 2007, 2 (02): : 68 - 78
  • [33] Role of social networks in building household livelihood resilience under payments for ecosystem services programs in a poor rural community in China
    Wang, Ying
    Zhang, Qi
    Li, Qirui
    Wang, Jianying
    Sannigrahi, Srikanta
    Bilsborrow, Richard
    Bellingrath-Kimura, Sonoko D.
    Li, Jiangfeng
    Song, Conghe
    JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2021, 86 : 208 - 225
  • [34] A targeted approach to payments for ecosystem services
    Wang, Pu
    Wolf, Steven A.
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2019, 17
  • [35] Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism
    Kosoy, Nicolas
    Corbera, Esteve
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (06) : 1228 - 1236
  • [36] Payments for Ecosystem Services and Wealth Distribution
    Wang, Pu
    Poe, Gregory L.
    Wolf, Steven A.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 132 : 63 - 68
  • [37] Ecosystem Services in the Milpa System: A Systematic Review
    Romero-Natale, Aline
    Acevedo-Sandoval, Otilio Arturo
    Sanchez-Porras, Arturo
    ONE ECOSYSTEM, 2024, 9
  • [38] Mapping lake ecosystem services: A systematic review
    Inacio, Miguel
    Barcelo, Damia
    Zhao, Wenwu
    Pereira, Paulo
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 847
  • [39] Gendered perspectives of ecosystem services: A systematic review
    Yang, Y. C. Ethan
    Passarelli, Simone
    Lovell, Robin J.
    Ringler, Claudia
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2018, 31 : 58 - 67
  • [40] Remote sensing of ecosystem services: A systematic review
    Barbosa, Caio C. de Araujo
    Atkinson, Peter M.
    Dearing, John A.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2015, 52 : 430 - 443