Schedule risk analysis of infrastructure projects: A hybrid dynamic approach

被引:55
|
作者
Xu, Xiaoxiao [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Jiayuan [3 ]
Li, Clyde Zhengdao [3 ]
Huang, Wenke [3 ]
Xia, Nini [4 ]
机构
[1] Swinburne Univ Technol, Dept Civil & Construct Engn, Hawthorn, Vic, Australia
[2] Swinburne Univ Technol, Ctr Sustainable Infrastruct, Hawthorn, Vic, Australia
[3] Shenzhen Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[4] Southeast Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Infrastructure project; Schedule risk; Hybrid dynamic approach; System dynamics; Discrete event simulation; DISCRETE-EVENT SIMULATION; PREFABRICATION HOUSING PRODUCTION; SYSTEM DYNAMICS; CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS; MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES; HONG-KONG; MODEL; ARCHITECTURE; IMPACTS; WASTE;
D O I
10.1016/j.autcon.2018.07.026
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Schedule risk is a major concern in infrastructure project management. Existing studies have proposed several models for schedule risk analysis, but few efforts have been made on the dynamics and uncertainty of risks and the generality and practicability of the model. To fill the research gaps, this study develops a hybrid dynamic approach for investigating the effect of risks on infrastructure project schedule performance. This approach combines system dynamics (SD) and discrete event simulation (DES) which have mainly been used to analyze the macroscopic and microcosmic construction issues in isolation, respectively. The model is then verified by data which is collected from a bridge construction project. As an application example, the effect of four selected risks on the schedule was explored. The results show that the proposed SD-DES model could be ease of modifying the model to reflect real situation, performing various sensitivity and uncertainty analysis, and showing simulation results more effectively.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 34
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Achieving efficiency in quantitative risk analysis process - Application on infrastructure projects
    Nabawy, Mohamed
    Khodeir, Laila M.
    AIN SHAMS ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2021, 12 (02) : 2303 - 2311
  • [32] Dynamic Modeling of Workforce Planning for Infrastructure Projects
    Sing, Michael C. P.
    Love, P. E. D.
    Edwards, D. J.
    Liu, Junxiao
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2016, 32 (06)
  • [33] Dynamic Management and Schedule Risk in Rail Transit Projects based on 4D-BIM
    Liu, Lina
    Zheng, Hua
    Zhang, Yi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCE (ITMS 2015), 2015, 34 : 1344 - 1347
  • [34] A Hybrid Approach for Dynamic Simulation of Safety Risks in Mega Construction Projects
    Xu, Na
    Liu, Qing
    Ma, Ling
    Deng, Yongliang
    Chang, Hong
    Ni, Guodong
    Zhou, Zhe
    Zhao, Dong
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2020, 2020
  • [35] Evolution of Risk-Based Cost and Schedule Estimates for North American Infrastructure Projects: What Have We Learned?
    Keizur, Alan E.
    Roberds, William J.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT 2021: TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2021, : 145 - 156
  • [36] Risk Assessment of Highway Infrastructure REITs Projects Based on the DEMATEL-ISM Approach
    Lv, Hongyi
    Shi, Zhenwu
    Liu, Jie
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (12)
  • [37] Information Security Risk Assessment in Critical Infrastructure: A Hybrid MCDM Approach
    Turskis, Zenonas
    Goranin, Nikolaj
    Nurusheva, Assel
    Boranbayev, Seilkhan
    INFORMATICA, 2019, 30 (01) : 187 - 211
  • [38] Detection of schedule delay risk of empirical construction projects
    Gebrehiwet, Tsegay
    Luo, Hanbin
    FRONTIERS OF ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2018, 5 (02) : 251 - 267
  • [39] Detection of schedule delay risk of empirical construction projects
    Tsegay GEBREHIWET
    Hanbin LUO
    Frontiers of Engineering Management, 2018, (02) : 251 - 267
  • [40] An approach to schedule estimation and tracking for rapid development projects
    Lovrek, I
    Sinkovic, V
    Grahovac, D
    Caric, A
    24TH EUROMICRO CONFERENCE - PROCEEDING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1998, : 816 - 823