Changes in nitrogen oxides emissions in California during 2005-2010 indicated from top-down and bottom-up emission estimates

被引:13
|
作者
Huang, Min [1 ]
Bowman, Kevin W. [1 ]
Carmichael, Gregory R. [2 ]
Chai, Tianfeng [3 ]
Pierce, R. Bradley [4 ]
Worden, John R. [1 ]
Luo, Ming [1 ]
Pollack, Ilana B. [5 ,6 ]
Ryerson, Thomas B. [6 ]
Nowak, John B. [5 ,6 ]
Neuman, J. Andrew [5 ,6 ]
Roberts, James M. [6 ]
Atlas, Elliot L. [7 ]
Blake, Donald R. [8 ]
机构
[1] CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Ctr Global & Reg Environm Res, Iowa City, IA USA
[3] NOAA Air Resources Lab, College Pk, MD USA
[4] NOAA Natl Environm Satellite Data & Informat Serv, Madison, WI USA
[5] Univ Colorado, Cooperat Inst Res Environm Sci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[6] NOAA Earth Syst Res Lab, Boulder, CO USA
[7] Univ Miami, Dept Atmospher Sci, Miami, FL USA
[8] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Chem, Irvine, CA 92717 USA
关键词
ADJOINT SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; AIR-QUALITY; UNITED-STATES; SURFACE OZONE; IN-SITU; NO2; OBSERVATIONS; SATELLITE NO2; LOS-ANGELES; INTEX-B; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1002/2014JD022268
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
In California, emission control strategies have been implemented to reduce air pollutants. Here we estimate the changes in nitrogen oxides (NOx = NO+ NO2) emissions in 2005-2010 using a state-of-the-art four-dimensional variational approach. We separately and jointly assimilate surface NO2 concentrations and tropospheric NO2 columns observed by Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) into the regional-scale Sulfur Transport and dEposition Model (STEM) chemical transport model on a 12 x 12 km(2) horizontal resolution grid in May 2010. The assimilation generates grid-scale top-down emission estimates, and the updated chemistry fields are evaluated with independent aircraft measurements during the NOAA California Nexus (CalNex) field experiment. The emission estimates constrained only by NO2 columns, only by surface NO2, and by both indicate statewide reductions of 26%, 29%, and 30% from similar to 0.3 Tg N/yr in the base year of 2005, respectively. The spatial distributions of the emission changes differ in these cases, which can be attributed to many factors including the differences in the observation sampling strategies and their uncertainties, as well as those in the sensitivities of column and surface NO2 with respect to NOx emissions. The updates in California's NOx emissions reduced the mean error in modeled surface ozone in the Western U.S., even though the uncertainties in some urban areas increased due to their NOx-saturated chemical regime. The statewide reductions in NOx emissions indicated from our observationally constrained emission estimates are also reflected in several independently developed inventories: similar to 30% in the California Air Resources Board bottom-up inventory, similar to 4% in the 2008 National Emission Inventory, and similar to 20% in the annual mean top-down estimates by Lamsal et al. using the global Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS)-Chem model and OMI NO2 columns. Despite the grid-scale differences among all top-down and bottom-up inventories, they all indicate stronger emission reductions in the urban regions. This study shows the potential of using space-/ground-based monitoring data and advanced data assimilation approach to timely and independently update NOx emission estimates on a monthly scale and at a fine grid resolution. The well-evaluated results here suggest that these approaches can be applied more broadly.
引用
收藏
页码:12928 / 12952
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The challenge of reconciling bottom-up agricultural methane emissions inventories with top-down measurements
    Desjardins, R. L.
    Worth, D. E.
    Pattey, E.
    VanderZaag, A.
    Srinivasan, R.
    Mauder, M.
    Worthy, D.
    Sweeney, C.
    Metzger, S.
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2018, 248 : 48 - 59
  • [22] Top-down or bottom-up digital transformation? A comparison of institutional changes and outcomes
    Marienfeldt, Justine
    Wehmeier, Liz Marla
    Kuhlmann, Sabine
    PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2024,
  • [23] Transitioning From Top-Down to Bottom-Up Cost Assessments in Fusion
    Butcher, Matthew Thomas
    Lux, Hanni
    Foster, Jack
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PLASMA SCIENCE, 2024, 52 (09) : 3608 - 3614
  • [24] From top-down to bottom-up to hybrid nanotechnologies: Road to nanodevices
    Teo, Boon K.
    Sun, X. H.
    JOURNAL OF CLUSTER SCIENCE, 2006, 17 (04) : 529 - 540
  • [25] Carving "Natural" Emotions: "Kindly" from Bottom-up but not Top-down
    Panksepp, Jaak
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 28 (02): : 395 - 422
  • [26] Designing redox metalloproteins from bottom-up and top-down perspectives
    Barker, PD
    CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (04) : 490 - 499
  • [27] LABORS RISKY PLUNGE INTO POLITICS - FROM TOP-DOWN TO BOTTOM-UP
    MEYERSON, H
    DISSENT, 1984, 31 (03) : 285 - 294
  • [28] ARE RAPID CHANGES IN BACTERIAL BIOMASS CAUSED BY SHIFTS FROM TOP-DOWN TO BOTTOM-UP CONTROL
    PSENNER, R
    SOMMARUGA, R
    LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 1992, 37 (05) : 1092 - 1100
  • [29] Methane emissions from natural gas production and use: reconciling bottom-up and top-down measurements
    Allen, David T.
    CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 5 : 78 - 83
  • [30] Top-down and bottom-up processes during observation: Implications for motor learning
    Roberts, James W.
    Bennett, Simon J.
    Elliott, Digby
    Hayes, Spencer J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SPORT SCIENCE, 2014, 14 : S250 - S256