Changes in nitrogen oxides emissions in California during 2005-2010 indicated from top-down and bottom-up emission estimates

被引:13
|
作者
Huang, Min [1 ]
Bowman, Kevin W. [1 ]
Carmichael, Gregory R. [2 ]
Chai, Tianfeng [3 ]
Pierce, R. Bradley [4 ]
Worden, John R. [1 ]
Luo, Ming [1 ]
Pollack, Ilana B. [5 ,6 ]
Ryerson, Thomas B. [6 ]
Nowak, John B. [5 ,6 ]
Neuman, J. Andrew [5 ,6 ]
Roberts, James M. [6 ]
Atlas, Elliot L. [7 ]
Blake, Donald R. [8 ]
机构
[1] CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Ctr Global & Reg Environm Res, Iowa City, IA USA
[3] NOAA Air Resources Lab, College Pk, MD USA
[4] NOAA Natl Environm Satellite Data & Informat Serv, Madison, WI USA
[5] Univ Colorado, Cooperat Inst Res Environm Sci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[6] NOAA Earth Syst Res Lab, Boulder, CO USA
[7] Univ Miami, Dept Atmospher Sci, Miami, FL USA
[8] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Chem, Irvine, CA 92717 USA
关键词
ADJOINT SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; AIR-QUALITY; UNITED-STATES; SURFACE OZONE; IN-SITU; NO2; OBSERVATIONS; SATELLITE NO2; LOS-ANGELES; INTEX-B; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1002/2014JD022268
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
In California, emission control strategies have been implemented to reduce air pollutants. Here we estimate the changes in nitrogen oxides (NOx = NO+ NO2) emissions in 2005-2010 using a state-of-the-art four-dimensional variational approach. We separately and jointly assimilate surface NO2 concentrations and tropospheric NO2 columns observed by Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) into the regional-scale Sulfur Transport and dEposition Model (STEM) chemical transport model on a 12 x 12 km(2) horizontal resolution grid in May 2010. The assimilation generates grid-scale top-down emission estimates, and the updated chemistry fields are evaluated with independent aircraft measurements during the NOAA California Nexus (CalNex) field experiment. The emission estimates constrained only by NO2 columns, only by surface NO2, and by both indicate statewide reductions of 26%, 29%, and 30% from similar to 0.3 Tg N/yr in the base year of 2005, respectively. The spatial distributions of the emission changes differ in these cases, which can be attributed to many factors including the differences in the observation sampling strategies and their uncertainties, as well as those in the sensitivities of column and surface NO2 with respect to NOx emissions. The updates in California's NOx emissions reduced the mean error in modeled surface ozone in the Western U.S., even though the uncertainties in some urban areas increased due to their NOx-saturated chemical regime. The statewide reductions in NOx emissions indicated from our observationally constrained emission estimates are also reflected in several independently developed inventories: similar to 30% in the California Air Resources Board bottom-up inventory, similar to 4% in the 2008 National Emission Inventory, and similar to 20% in the annual mean top-down estimates by Lamsal et al. using the global Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS)-Chem model and OMI NO2 columns. Despite the grid-scale differences among all top-down and bottom-up inventories, they all indicate stronger emission reductions in the urban regions. This study shows the potential of using space-/ground-based monitoring data and advanced data assimilation approach to timely and independently update NOx emission estimates on a monthly scale and at a fine grid resolution. The well-evaluated results here suggest that these approaches can be applied more broadly.
引用
收藏
页码:12928 / 12952
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] On the Temporal Relation of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Mechanisms during Guidance of Attention
    Wykowska, Agnieszka
    Schuboe, Anna
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 22 (04) : 640 - 654
  • [32] Top-Down and Bottom-Up Guidance in Normal Aging During Scene Search
    Ramzaoui, Hanane
    Faure, Sylvane
    Spotorno, Sara
    PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2021, 36 (04) : 433 - 451
  • [33] Dissociable Effects of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Attention during Episodic Encoding
    Uncapher, Melina R.
    Hutchinson, J. Benjamin
    Wagner, Anthony D.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 31 (35): : 12613 - 12628
  • [34] A benchmarking tool to screen and compare bottom-up and top-down atmospheric emission inventories
    M. Guevara
    S. Lopez-Aparicio
    C. Cuvelier
    L. Tarrason
    A. Clappier
    P. Thunis
    Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 2017, 10 : 627 - 642
  • [35] A benchmarking tool to screen and compare bottom-up and top-down atmospheric emission inventories
    Guevara, M.
    Lopez-Aparicio, S.
    Cuvelier, C.
    Tarrason, L.
    Clappier, A.
    Thunis, P.
    AIR QUALITY ATMOSPHERE AND HEALTH, 2017, 10 (05): : 627 - 642
  • [36] Temporal variability largely explains top-down/bottom-up difference in methane emission estimates from a natural gas production region
    Vaughn, Timothy L.
    Bell, Clay S.
    Pickering, Cody K.
    Schwietzke, Stefan
    Heath, Garvin A.
    Petron, Gabrielle
    Zimmerle, Daniel J.
    Schnell, Russell C.
    Nummedal, Dag
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2018, 115 (46) : 11712 - 11717
  • [37] Effects of top-down and bottom-up elementary school standards reform in an underperforming California district
    Mason, B
    Mason, DA
    Mendez, M
    Nelsen, G
    Orwig, R
    ELEMENTARY SCHOOL JOURNAL, 2005, 105 (04): : 353 - 376
  • [38] Exploring Gaps between Bottom-Up and Top-Down Emission Estimates Based on Uncertainties in Multiple Emission Inventories: A Case Study on CH4 Emissions in China
    Cheewaphongphan, Penwadee
    Chatani, Satoru
    Saigusa, Nobuko
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (07)
  • [39] Reconciling the bottom-up and top-down estimates of the methane chemical sink using multiple observations
    Zhao, Yuanhong
    Saunois, Marielle
    Bousquet, Philippe
    Lin, Xin
    Hegglin, Michaela I.
    Canadell, Josep G.
    Jackson, Robert B.
    Zheng, Bo
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2023, 23 (01) : 789 - 807
  • [40] FUTURE CONSUMPTION AND EMISSIONS OF HYDROFLUOROCARBON (HFC) ALTERNATIVES TO CFCS - COMPARISON OF ESTIMATES USING TOP-DOWN END BOTTOM-UP APPROACHES
    MCCULLOCH, A
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 21 (04) : 353 - 362