Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurement methods in phakic and pseudophakic eyes

被引:60
|
作者
Kriechbaum, K
Findl, O
Kiss, B
Sacu, S
Petternel, V
Drexler, W
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Inst Med Phys, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Vienna, Dept Ophthalmol, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01822-9
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements in phakic and pseudophakic eyes using a slit-beam photographic technique (IOLMaster, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) with those obtained with the laboratory prototype version of partial coherence interferometry (PCI) and with conventional applanation ultrasound in phakic eyes. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna University, Vienna, Austria. Methods: Thirty-three ACDs of 28 patients with age-related cataract were measured preoperatively with a slit-beam photographic technique (IOLMaster) and the prototype version of PCI. In 24 eyes, the ACID was also assessed with applanation ultrasound. In addition, 34 ACDs of 18 pseudophakic patients in a different study population were examined postoperatively with the IOLMaster and PCI Results: The median ACD in the phakic eyes was 3.06 mm (range 1.93 to 3.90 mm) with the IOLMaster, 3.09 mm with PCI (range 1.49 to 4.06 mm), and 2.87 mm (range 2.18 to 3.33 mm) with applanation ultrasound. The precision was 0.005 mm for PCI and 0.015 mm for IOLMaster measurement. The median difference between the IOLMaster and PCI ACD biometry was 0.01 mm +/- 0.14 (SD) (range -0.44 to 0.17 mm) (P = .71). In pseudophakic eyes, the 2 methods showed a median difference of -0.22 mm (range -0.45 to 1.99 mm) (P > .1) and did not correlate (r = 0.21; P > .2). Conclusions: In phakic eyes, the difference between IOLMaster and PCI measurements was small and not statistically significant. In pseudophakic eyes, the difference was larger and the methods did not correlate. (C) 2003 ASCRS and ESCRS.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 94
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Anterior Chamber Depth Measurement in Phakic and Pseudophakic Eyes
    Su, Po-Fang
    Lo, Andy Y.
    Hu, Chao-Yu
    Chang, Shu-Wen
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2008, 85 (12) : 1193 - 1200
  • [2] Anterior Chamber Depth Measurement in Pseudophakic Eyes: A Comparison of Pentacam and Ultrasound
    Savini, Giacomo
    Olsen, Thomas
    Carbonara, Claudio
    Pazzaglia, Sebastiano
    Barboni, Piero
    Carbonelli, Michele
    Hoffer, Kenneth J.
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 26 (05) : 341 - 347
  • [3] A comparison of anterior chamber depth in phakic and pseudophakic eyes following glaucoma filtering procedures.
    Aminlari, AA
    Rutherford, GEW
    Dailey, JR
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1997, 38 (04) : 4983 - 4983
  • [4] Anterior chamber depth measurements in phakic and pseudophakic eyes: Pentacam versus ultrasound device
    Nemeth, Gabor
    Vajas, Attila
    Kolozsvari, Bence
    Berta, Andras
    Modis, Laszlo
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 32 (08): : 1331 - 1335
  • [5] Pseudophakic anterior chamber depth measurement
    Cartwright, N. E. Knox
    Tole, D. M.
    EYE, 2009, 23 (11) : 2120 - 2120
  • [6] Pseudophakic anterior chamber depth measurement
    N E Knox Cartwright
    D M Tole
    Eye, 2009, 23 : 2120 - 2120
  • [7] Factors influencing anterior chamber depth in pseudophakic eyes
    An, Youngju
    Kang, Eun-Kyoung
    Joo, Choun-Ki
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2017, 58 (08)
  • [8] Agreement of phakic and pseudophakic anterior chamber depth measurements in IOLMaster and Pentacam
    Hamoudi, Hassan
    Christensen, Ulrik Correll
    la Cour, Morten
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2018, 96 (03) : E403 - E403
  • [9] Reply: Pseudophakic anterior chamber depth measurement
    M A Nanavaty
    S M Raj
    V A Vasavada
    V A Vasavada
    A R Vasavada
    Eye, 2009, 23 : 2120 - 2120
  • [10] SHALLOW ANTERIOR-CHAMBER FOLLOWING TRABECULECTOMY SURGERY IN PHAKIC VERSUS PSEUDOPHAKIC EYES
    DAILEY, JR
    AMINLARI, A
    SASSANI, JW
    PARNES, RE
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1994, 35 (04) : 1419 - 1419