Measuring physical activity in children: A comparison of four different methods

被引:15
|
作者
O'Connor, J [1 ]
Ball, EJ
Steinbeck, KS
Davies, PSW
Wishart, C
Gaskin, KJ
Baur, LA
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Discipline Paediat & Child Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Childrens Hosp Westmead, James Fairfax Inst Paediat Nutr, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
[3] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
[4] Queensland Univ Technol, Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1123/pes.15.2.202
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
The aim of this study of 56 children aged 6-9 years was to identify measures of physical activity that could be used in either clinical or population studies. Comparisons were made between four measures of physical activity: a three day parent-reported activity diary, a parent-reported physical activity questionnaire, the Tritrac-R3D(TM) accelerometer (worn three days) and physical activity energy expenditure calculated over 10 days by the doubly labeled water (DLW) technique. The strongest correlation between methods was for the diary and Tritrac-R3D(TM) during the two hour after-school period (1530-1730 hours) (r = 0.75, P < 0.0001). Activity level in this after-school period was positively correlated with average activity level over three days for both Tritrac-R3D(TM) (r = 0.53, P < 0.01) and diary (r = 0.54, P < 0.0001). No associations were found between measures of activity from DLW and activity measures from the Tritrac-R3D(TM), diary or questionnaire. These results suggest that the two hour after-school period is of high interest for future population studies of physical activity in school-age children.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 215
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of four methods for measuring osmotic potential of tree leaves
    Callister, Andrew N.
    Arndt, Stefan K.
    Adams, Mark A.
    PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 2006, 127 (03) : 383 - 392
  • [32] A systematic comparison of four pharmacopoeial methods for measuring powder flowability
    Tharanon, Weeraya
    Guo, Yiwang
    Peerapattana, Jomjai
    Sun, Changquan Calvin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 2024, 661
  • [33] Accelerometry for measuring physical activity. Recommendations on methods
    Gabrys, Lars
    Thiel, Christian
    Tallner, Alexander
    Wilms, Britta
    Mueller, Carsten
    Kahlert, Daniela
    Jekauc, Darko
    Frick, Fabienne
    Schulz, Holger
    Sprengeler, Ole
    Hey, Stefan
    Kobel, Susanne
    Vogt, Lutz
    GERMAN JOURNAL OF EXERCISE AND SPORT RESEARCH, 2015, 45 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [34] A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR MEASURING AND CALCULATING RADIATION IN SEA
    KARABASH.EI
    OCHAKOVS.YY
    RUTKOVSK.VA
    OCEANOLOGY-USSR, 1968, 8 (02): : 255 - &
  • [35] A comparison of different in vitro methods for measuring mucoadhesive performance
    Tamburic, S
    Craig, DQM
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 1997, 44 (02) : 159 - 167
  • [36] A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR MEASURING SOIL-SALINITY
    NADLER, A
    DASBERG, S
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1980, 44 (04) : 725 - 728
  • [37] MEASURING TOURISM SEASONALITY: APPLICATION AND COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS
    Corluka, Goran
    Vukusic, Ana
    Kelic, Ivan
    TOURISM & HOSPITALITY INDUSTRY 2018: TRENDS AND CHALLENGES, 2018, : 55 - 63
  • [38] A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR MEASURING THE CANOPY LIGHT REGIME
    SALMINEN, R
    NILSON, T
    HARI, P
    KAIPIAINEN, L
    ROSS, J
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 1983, 20 (03) : 897 - 904
  • [39] A COMPARISON BETWEEN DIFFERENT METHODS OF MEASURING SARCOMER LENGTH
    POSPIECH, E
    HONIKEL, KO
    FLEISCHWIRTSCHAFT, 1987, 67 (04): : 461 - &
  • [40] COMPARISON OF 4 DIFFERENT METHODS FOR MEASURING PROJECTILE VELOCITY
    MILESIS, CA
    STRAUB, WF
    MATTHEWS, ME
    PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1974, 38 (03) : 1015 - 1022