Measuring physical activity in children: A comparison of four different methods

被引:15
|
作者
O'Connor, J [1 ]
Ball, EJ
Steinbeck, KS
Davies, PSW
Wishart, C
Gaskin, KJ
Baur, LA
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Discipline Paediat & Child Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Childrens Hosp Westmead, James Fairfax Inst Paediat Nutr, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
[3] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
[4] Queensland Univ Technol, Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1123/pes.15.2.202
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
The aim of this study of 56 children aged 6-9 years was to identify measures of physical activity that could be used in either clinical or population studies. Comparisons were made between four measures of physical activity: a three day parent-reported activity diary, a parent-reported physical activity questionnaire, the Tritrac-R3D(TM) accelerometer (worn three days) and physical activity energy expenditure calculated over 10 days by the doubly labeled water (DLW) technique. The strongest correlation between methods was for the diary and Tritrac-R3D(TM) during the two hour after-school period (1530-1730 hours) (r = 0.75, P < 0.0001). Activity level in this after-school period was positively correlated with average activity level over three days for both Tritrac-R3D(TM) (r = 0.53, P < 0.01) and diary (r = 0.54, P < 0.0001). No associations were found between measures of activity from DLW and activity measures from the Tritrac-R3D(TM), diary or questionnaire. These results suggest that the two hour after-school period is of high interest for future population studies of physical activity in school-age children.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 215
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A comparison of four different block bootstrap methods
    Radovanov, Boris
    Marcikic, Aleksandra
    CROATIAN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2014, 5 (02) : 189 - 202
  • [22] Comparison of four different phenylalanine determination methods
    Fingerhut, R
    Stehn, M
    Kohlschutter, A
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 1997, 264 (01) : 65 - 73
  • [23] Comparison of Four Actigraph Cutpoints for Physical Activity
    Napolitano, Melissa A.
    Whiteley, Jessica A.
    Albrecht, Anna
    Pinheiro, Susan
    Marcus, Bess H.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2006, 38 (05): : S561 - S561
  • [24] A Comparison of Four Recreation Facilitation Styles and Physical Activity Outcomes in Elementary School Children
    West, Stephanie T.
    Shores, Kindal A.
    JOURNAL OF PARK AND RECREATION ADMINISTRATION, 2008, 26 (02) : 115 - 133
  • [25] Comparison of methods to estimate physical activity and energy expenditure in African American children
    Ramírez-Marrero, FA
    Smith, BA
    Sherman, WM
    Kirby, TE
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2005, 26 (05) : 363 - 371
  • [26] Measuring Enjoyment of Physical Activity in Children: Validation of the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale
    Moore, Justin B.
    Yin, Zenong
    Hanes, John
    Duda, Joan
    Gutin, Bernard
    Barbeau, Paule
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED SPORT PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 21 : S116 - S129
  • [27] COMPARISON OF 3 METHODS FOR MEASURING LIPASE ACTIVITY
    TANAKA, WK
    FELD, R
    JOHNSON, G
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 1985, 31 (06) : 1003 - 1003
  • [28] COMPARISON OF 5 METHODS FOR MEASURING SPUTUM PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
    CHODOSH, S
    MEDICI, TC
    ENSLEIN, K
    BULLETIN DE PHYSIO-PATHOLOGIE RESPIRATOIRE, 1973, 9 (01): : 127 - 141
  • [29] A COMPARISON OF FOUR CURRENT METHODS OF ESTIMATING PHYSICAL STATUS
    Marshall, Everett L.
    CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1937, 8 (01) : 89 - 92
  • [30] Different methods of measuring physical activity in cystic fibrosis: accelerometer versus new electronic devices
    Savi, Daniela
    Graziano, Luigi
    Schiavetto, Stefano
    Simmonds, Nicholas J.
    Giordani, Barbara
    Leggieri, Emanuela
    Rivolta, Marco
    Asciutti, Dario
    Palange, Paolo
    Elborn, J. Stuart
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2019, 54