Scan-rescan reproducibility of segmental aortic wall shear stress as assessed by phase-specific segmentation with 4D flow MRI in healthy volunteers

被引:32
|
作者
van der Palen, Roel L. F. [1 ]
Roest, Arno A. W. [1 ]
van den Boogaard, Pieter J. [2 ]
de Roos, Albert [2 ]
Blom, Nico A. [1 ]
Westenberg, Jos J. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Div Pediat Cardiol, Dept Pediat, Med Ctr, Albinusdreef 2, NL-2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Dept Radiol, Med Ctr, Albinusdreef 2, NL-2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
4D flow MRI; Wall shear stress; Aorta; Aortopathy; BLOOD-FLOW; VALVE; QUANTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10334-018-0688-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim was to investigate scan-rescan reproducibility and observer variability of segmental aortic 3D systolic wall shear stress (WSS) by phase-specific segmentation with 4D flow MRI in healthy volunteers. Materials and methods: Ten healthy volunteers (age 26.5 +/- 2.6years) underwent aortic 4D flow MRI twice. Maximum 3D systolic WSS (WSSmax) and mean 3D systolic WSS (WSSmean) for five thoracic aortic segments over five systolic cardiac phases by phase-specific segmentations were calculated. Scan-rescan analysis and observer reproducibility analysis were performed. Results: San-rescan data showed overall good reproducibility for WSSmean (coefficient of variation, COV 10-15%) with moderate-to-strong intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 0.63-0.89). The variability in WSSmax was high (COV 16-31%) with moderate-to-good ICC (0.55-0.79) for different aortic segments. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility was good-to-excellent for regional aortic WSSmax (ICC >= 0.78; COV <= 17%) and strong-to-excellent for WSSmean (ICC >= 0.86; COV <= 11%). In general, ascending aortic segments showed more WSSmax/WSSmean variability compared to aortic arch or descending aortic segments for scan-rescan, intraobserver and interobserver comparison. Conclusions: Scan-rescan reproducibility was good for WSSmean and moderate for WSSmax for all thoracic aortic segments over multiple systolic phases in healthy volunteers. Intra/interobserver reproducibility for segmental WSS assessment was good-to-excellent. Variability of WSSmax is higher and should be taken into account in case of individual follow-up or in comparative rest-stress studies to avoid misinterpretation.
引用
收藏
页码:653 / 663
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Minimum wall shear stress points and their underlying intra-aneurysmal flow structures of unruptured cerebral aneurysms on 4D flow MRI
    Futami, Kazuya
    Misaki, Kouichi
    Uno, Takehiro
    Nambu, Iku
    Tsutsui, Taishi
    Kamide, Tomoya
    Nakada, Mitsutoshi
    JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2023, 50 (03) : 302 - 308
  • [42] Impact of sequence type and field strength (1.5, 3, and 7T) on 4D flow MRI hemodynamic aortic parameters in healthy volunteers
    Wiesemann, Stephanie
    Schmitter, Sebastian
    Demir, Aylin
    Prothmann, Marcel
    Schwenke, Carsten
    Chawla, Ashish
    von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff, Florian
    Greiser, Andreas
    Jin, Ning
    Bollache, Emilie
    Markl, Michael
    Schulz-Menger, Jeanette
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2021, 85 (02) : 721 - 733
  • [43] Flow-based method demonstrates improved accuracy for calculating wall shear stress in arterial flows from 4D flow MRI data
    Hurd, Elliott R.
    Iffrig, Elizabeth
    Jiang, David
    Oshinski, John N.
    Timmins, Lucas H.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2023, 146
  • [44] 4D-flow MRI derived wall shear stress for the risk stratification of bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy: A systematic review
    Qin, Jiaxing Jason
    Obeidy, Peyman
    Gok, Mustafa
    Gholipour, Alireza
    Grieve, Stuart M. M.
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 9
  • [45] 3D axial and circumferential wall shear stress from 4D flow MRI data using a finite element method and a laplacian approach
    Sotelo, Julio
    Dux-Santoy, Lydia
    Guala, Andrea
    Rodriguez-Palomares, Jose
    Evangelista, Arturo
    Sing-Long, Carlos
    Urbina, Jesus
    Mura, Joaquin
    Hurtado, Daniel E.
    Uribe, Sergio
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2018, 79 (05) : 2816 - 2823
  • [46] Aortic dissection: visualisation of aortic blood flow and quantification of wall shear stress using time-resolved, 3D phase-contrast MRI
    Alex Pitcher
    Tom E Cassar
    Paul Leeson
    Jane M Francis
    Edward Blair
    Paul B Wordsworth
    J Colin Forfar
    Steffen E Petersen
    Michael Markl
    Stefan Neubauer
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 13 (Suppl 1)
  • [47] Comparing wall shear stress values by using different 4D flow postprocessing tools in cardiovascular magnetic resonance in bicuspid aortic valve disease
    Hanigk, M.
    Burgstaller, E.
    Latus, H.
    Shehu, N.
    Mkrtchyan, N.
    Martinoff, S.
    Ewert, P.
    Stern, H.
    Meierhofer, C.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2019, 20 : 355 - 355
  • [48] A comparison of 4D flow MRI-derived wall shear stress with computational fluid dynamics methods for intracranial aneurysms and carotid bifurcations - A review
    Szajer, Jeremy
    Ho-Shon, Kevin
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2018, 48 : 62 - 69
  • [49] Abnormal Flow Dynamics Result in Low Wall Shear Stress and High Oscillatory Shear Index in Abdominal Aortic Dilatation: Initial in vivo Assessment with 4D-flow MRI
    Takehara, Yasuo
    Isoda, Haruo
    Takahashi, Mamoru
    Unno, Naoki
    Shiiya, Norihiko
    Ushio, Takasuke
    Goshima, Satoshi
    Naganawa, Shinji
    Alley, Marcus
    Wakayama, Tetsuya
    Nozaki, Atsushi
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 19 (03) : 235 - 246
  • [50] 4D flow CMR analysis comparing patients with anatomically shaped aortic sinus prostheses, tube prostheses and healthy subjects introducing the wall shear stress gradient: a case control study
    Sieren, Malte Maria
    Schultz, Victoria
    Fujita, Buntaro
    Wegner, Franz
    Huellebrand, Markus
    Scharfschwerdt, Michael
    Sievers, Hans-Hinrich
    Barkhausen, Joerg
    Frydrychowicz, Alex
    Oechtering, Thekla Helene
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2020, 22 (01)