Scan-rescan reproducibility of segmental aortic wall shear stress as assessed by phase-specific segmentation with 4D flow MRI in healthy volunteers

被引:32
|
作者
van der Palen, Roel L. F. [1 ]
Roest, Arno A. W. [1 ]
van den Boogaard, Pieter J. [2 ]
de Roos, Albert [2 ]
Blom, Nico A. [1 ]
Westenberg, Jos J. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Div Pediat Cardiol, Dept Pediat, Med Ctr, Albinusdreef 2, NL-2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Dept Radiol, Med Ctr, Albinusdreef 2, NL-2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
4D flow MRI; Wall shear stress; Aorta; Aortopathy; BLOOD-FLOW; VALVE; QUANTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10334-018-0688-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim was to investigate scan-rescan reproducibility and observer variability of segmental aortic 3D systolic wall shear stress (WSS) by phase-specific segmentation with 4D flow MRI in healthy volunteers. Materials and methods: Ten healthy volunteers (age 26.5 +/- 2.6years) underwent aortic 4D flow MRI twice. Maximum 3D systolic WSS (WSSmax) and mean 3D systolic WSS (WSSmean) for five thoracic aortic segments over five systolic cardiac phases by phase-specific segmentations were calculated. Scan-rescan analysis and observer reproducibility analysis were performed. Results: San-rescan data showed overall good reproducibility for WSSmean (coefficient of variation, COV 10-15%) with moderate-to-strong intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 0.63-0.89). The variability in WSSmax was high (COV 16-31%) with moderate-to-good ICC (0.55-0.79) for different aortic segments. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility was good-to-excellent for regional aortic WSSmax (ICC >= 0.78; COV <= 17%) and strong-to-excellent for WSSmean (ICC >= 0.86; COV <= 11%). In general, ascending aortic segments showed more WSSmax/WSSmean variability compared to aortic arch or descending aortic segments for scan-rescan, intraobserver and interobserver comparison. Conclusions: Scan-rescan reproducibility was good for WSSmean and moderate for WSSmax for all thoracic aortic segments over multiple systolic phases in healthy volunteers. Intra/interobserver reproducibility for segmental WSS assessment was good-to-excellent. Variability of WSSmax is higher and should be taken into account in case of individual follow-up or in comparative rest-stress studies to avoid misinterpretation.
引用
收藏
页码:653 / 663
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Characterization of Abnormal Wall Shear Stress Using 4D Flow MRI in Human Bicuspid Aortopathy
    van Ooij, Pim
    Potters, Wouter V.
    Collins, Jeremy
    Carr, Maria
    Carr, James
    Malaisrie, S. Chris
    Fedak, Paul W. M.
    McCarthy, Patrick M.
    Markl, Michael
    Barker, Alex J.
    ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 43 (06) : 1385 - 1397
  • [22] ESTIMATION OF WALL SHEAR STRESS USING 4D FLOW CARDIOVASCULAR MRI AND COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS
    Soudah, E.
    Casacuberta, J.
    Gamez-Montero, P. J.
    Perez, J. S.
    Rodriguez-Cancio, M.
    Raush, G.
    Li, C. H.
    Carreras, F.
    Castilla, R.
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2017, 17 (03)
  • [23] Quantification and comparison of 4D Flow MRI derived wall shear stress and MRE derived wall shear stiffness of abdominal aorta
    Venkata Sita Priyanka Illapani
    Julio Garcia
    Ria Mazumder
    Richard D White
    Michael Markl
    Arunark Kolipaka
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 18 (Suppl 1)
  • [24] Noninvasive 4D pressure difference mapping derived from 4D flow MRI in patients with repaired aortic coarctation: comparison with young healthy volunteers
    Rengier, Fabian
    Delles, Michael
    Eichhorn, Joachim
    Azad, Yoo-Jin
    von Tengg-Kobligk, Hendrik
    Ley-Zaporozhan, Julia
    Dillmann, Ruediger
    Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich
    Unterhinninghofen, Roland
    Ley, Sebastian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2015, 31 (04): : 823 - 830
  • [25] Noninvasive 4D pressure difference mapping derived from 4D flow MRI in patients with repaired aortic coarctation: comparison with young healthy volunteers
    Fabian Rengier
    Michael Delles
    Joachim Eichhorn
    Yoo-Jin Azad
    Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk
    Julia Ley-Zaporozhan
    Rüdiger Dillmann
    Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
    Roland Unterhinninghofen
    Sebastian Ley
    The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2015, 31 : 823 - 830
  • [26] Ascending aortic wall shear stress and distensibility are different in patients with corrected atrioventricular septal defect compared to healthy controls: a comprehensive CMR and 4D flow MRI evaluation
    Bernadette Elders
    Pieter J van den Boogaard
    Emmeline Calkoen
    Nico A Blom
    Albert de Roos
    Jos J Westenberg
    Arno Roest
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 18 (Suppl 1)
  • [27] Wall Shear Stress Estimation for 4D Flow MRI Using Navier-Stokes Equation Correction
    Zhang, Jiacheng
    Rothenberger, Sean M.
    Brindise, Melissa C.
    Markl, Michael
    Rayz, Vitaliy L.
    Vlachos, Pavlos P.
    ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 50 (12) : 1810 - 1825
  • [28] In Vivo Assessment of Wall Shear Stress in the Atherosclerotic Aorta Using Flow-Sensitive 4D MRI
    Harloff, Andreas
    Nussbaumer, Andrea
    Bauer, Simon
    Stalder, Aurelien F.
    Frydrychowicz, Alex
    Weiller, Cornelius
    Hennig, Juergen
    Markl, Michael
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2010, 63 (06) : 1529 - 1536
  • [29] Analysis of aortic pressure fields from 4D flow MRI in healthy volunteers: Associations with age and left ventricular remodeling
    Bouaou, Kevin
    Bargiotas, Ioannis
    Dietenbeck, Thomas
    Bollache, Emilie
    Soulat, Gilles
    Craiem, Damian
    Houriez-Gombaud-Saintonge, Sophia
    De Cesare, Alain
    Gencer, Umit
    Giron, Alain
    Redheuil, Alban
    Messas, Emmanuel
    Lucor, Didier
    Mousseaux, Elie
    Kachenoura, Nadjia
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2019, 50 (03) : 982 - 993
  • [30] Transcatheter aortic valve replacement alters ascending aortic blood flow and wall shear stress patterns: A 4D flow MRI comparison with age-matched, elderly controls
    E. S. Farag
    J. Vendrik
    P. van Ooij
    Q. L. Poortvliet
    F. van Kesteren
    L. W. Wollersheim
    A. Kaya
    A. H. G. Driessen
    J. J. Piek
    K. T. Koch
    J. Baan
    R. N. Planken
    J. Kluin
    A. J. Nederveen
    B. A. J. M. de Mol
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 1444 - 1451