Contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography to evaluate anastomotic integrity before ileostomy closure in postoperative colorectal cancer patients

被引:1
|
作者
Kim, Yeun-Yoon [1 ]
Seo, Nieun [1 ]
Lee, Kang Young [2 ]
Kim, Nam Kyu [2 ]
Lim, Joon Seok [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Severance Hosp, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Severance Hosp, Dept Surg, Coll Med, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
关键词
Ileostomy; Colorectal cancer; Anastomotic leakage; Computed tomography; LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION; RISK-FACTORS; ENEMA PRIOR; LEAKAGE; CT; SURVEILLANCE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-021-03118-4
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To investigate the usefulness of contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CECT) to predict clinically significant anastomotic leakage (CSAL) in patients who received colorectal cancer surgery with diverting ileostomy. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery with diverting ileostomy from January 2014 to May 2018 and postoperative CECT were included. The performance of significant CECT features, identified using multivariable logistic regression, to predict CSAL was calculated. In subgroup analysis, the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCs) were compared between CECT and water-soluble contrast enema (WSCE) using DeLong's method. Results Of 325 patients (median age, 58 years; 213 men), CECT was routinely performed to evaluate cancer status in 307 (94.5%), and CSAL was observed in 28 (8.6%). After multivariable adjustment, anastomotic mural defect (odds ratio [OR] 5.24; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.77-15.51; p = 0.003), perianastomotic air (OR 7.28; 95% CI 1.82-29.17; p = 0.007) and ischemic colitis (OR 3.30; 95% CI 1.13-9.61; p = 0.029) were significantly associated with CSAL. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of significant CECT features were 60.7%, 88.2%, 85.9%, 32.7%, and 96.0%, respectively. In subgroup analysis of 144 patients, the AUROC using significant CECT features (optimal sensitivity/specificity, 50.0%/90.4%) was comparable to that using WSCE (optimal sensitivity/specificity, 12.5%/97.8%) to predict CSAL (0.704 vs. 0.552, p = 0.085). Conclusion CECT performed after colorectal cancer surgery may be useful to assess anastomotic integrity before ileostomy closure, especially to negatively predict CSAL. In the presence of anastomotic mural defect, perianastomotic air, or ischemic colitis, WSCE may be recommended to exclude CSAL.
引用
收藏
页码:4130 / 4137
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY IN CIRRHOTIC PATIENTS UNDERGOING CONTRAST-ENHANCED COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
    Visconti, Luca
    Filomia, Roberto
    Maimone, Sergio
    Montuori, Francesca
    Ricciardi, Carlo Alberto
    Di Mauro, Eleonora
    Saitta, Carlo
    Cacciola, Irene
    Caccamo, Gaia
    Aloisi, Carmela
    Santoro, Domenico
    Squadrito, Giovanni
    Raimondo, Giovanni
    Buemi, Michele
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 30
  • [42] ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY IN CIRRHOTIC PATIENTS UNDERGOING CONTRAST-ENHANCED COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
    Filomia, R.
    Maimone, S.
    Saitta, C.
    Visconti, L.
    Caloggero, S.
    Bottari, A.
    Alibrandi, A.
    Cacciola, I.
    Caccamo, G.
    Spinella, S.
    Vadala, D.
    Gambino, C. G.
    Franze, M. S.
    Gambino, G.
    Raimondo, G.
    Squadrito, G.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2015, 47 : E17 - E17
  • [43] Influence of contrast-enhanced computed tomography on course and outcome in patients with acute pancreatitis
    Uhl, W
    Roggo, A
    Kirschstein, T
    Anghelacopoulos, SE
    Gloor, B
    Müller, CA
    Malfertheiner, P
    Büchler, MW
    PANCREAS, 2002, 24 (02) : 191 - 197
  • [44] Acute kidney injury in cirrhotic patients undergoing contrast-enhanced computed tomography
    Filomia, Roberto
    Maimone, Sergio
    Caccamo, Gaia
    Saitta, Carlo
    Visconti, Luca
    Alibrandi, Angela
    Caloggero, Simona
    Bottari, Antonio
    Franze, Maria Stella
    Gambino, Carmine Gabriele
    Lembo, Tindaro
    Oliva, Giovanni
    Cacciola, Irene
    Raimondo, Giovanni
    Squadrito, Giovanni
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (38)
  • [45] A meta-analysis of contrast-enhanced computer tomography in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer
    Man, Shuqian
    Zou, Jianxun
    Wang, Mingjie
    Liang, Feng
    Chen, Shuyan
    Zhang, Xueyong
    Li, Xudan
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 12 (05) : 79 - 81
  • [46] Can contrast-enhanced ultrasonography replace multidetector-computed tomography in the detection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer?
    Larsen, Lars Peter Skovgaard
    Rosenkilde, Mona
    Christensen, Henrik
    Bang, Niels
    Bolvig, Lars
    Christiansen, Thomas
    Laurberg, Soren
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2009, 69 (02) : 308 - 313
  • [47] The Diagnostic Impact of Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) in Evaluating Lymph Node Involvement in Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Review
    Inamdar, Akash
    Shinde, Raju K.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (06)
  • [48] Comparative Study on Diagnosis Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography after Treating Advanced Renal Cancer Patients with Yiqi Jiedu Decoction
    Lan, Yupeng
    Gong, Tengfen
    Zhou, Ruhai
    Wu, Meng
    Liu, Zhenzhen
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 2021
  • [49] Prediction of Chemotherapy Efficacy in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Ovarian Metastases: A Preliminary Study Using Contrast-Enhanced Computed-Tomography-Based Radiomics
    Yu, Jinghan
    Li, Xiaofen
    Zeng, Hanjiang
    Yin, Hongkun
    Wang, Ya
    Wang, Bo
    Qiu, Meng
    Wu, Bing
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [50] Dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the treatment evaluation of patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with ablation: a feasibility study
    Andersen, Iben R.
    Thorup, Kennet
    Jepsen, Betina N.
    Mortensen, Frank, V
    Nielsen, Dennis T.
    Rasmussen, Finn
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2019, 60 (08) : 936 - 945