Contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography to evaluate anastomotic integrity before ileostomy closure in postoperative colorectal cancer patients

被引:1
|
作者
Kim, Yeun-Yoon [1 ]
Seo, Nieun [1 ]
Lee, Kang Young [2 ]
Kim, Nam Kyu [2 ]
Lim, Joon Seok [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Severance Hosp, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Severance Hosp, Dept Surg, Coll Med, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
关键词
Ileostomy; Colorectal cancer; Anastomotic leakage; Computed tomography; LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION; RISK-FACTORS; ENEMA PRIOR; LEAKAGE; CT; SURVEILLANCE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-021-03118-4
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To investigate the usefulness of contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CECT) to predict clinically significant anastomotic leakage (CSAL) in patients who received colorectal cancer surgery with diverting ileostomy. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery with diverting ileostomy from January 2014 to May 2018 and postoperative CECT were included. The performance of significant CECT features, identified using multivariable logistic regression, to predict CSAL was calculated. In subgroup analysis, the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCs) were compared between CECT and water-soluble contrast enema (WSCE) using DeLong's method. Results Of 325 patients (median age, 58 years; 213 men), CECT was routinely performed to evaluate cancer status in 307 (94.5%), and CSAL was observed in 28 (8.6%). After multivariable adjustment, anastomotic mural defect (odds ratio [OR] 5.24; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.77-15.51; p = 0.003), perianastomotic air (OR 7.28; 95% CI 1.82-29.17; p = 0.007) and ischemic colitis (OR 3.30; 95% CI 1.13-9.61; p = 0.029) were significantly associated with CSAL. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of significant CECT features were 60.7%, 88.2%, 85.9%, 32.7%, and 96.0%, respectively. In subgroup analysis of 144 patients, the AUROC using significant CECT features (optimal sensitivity/specificity, 50.0%/90.4%) was comparable to that using WSCE (optimal sensitivity/specificity, 12.5%/97.8%) to predict CSAL (0.704 vs. 0.552, p = 0.085). Conclusion CECT performed after colorectal cancer surgery may be useful to assess anastomotic integrity before ileostomy closure, especially to negatively predict CSAL. In the presence of anastomotic mural defect, perianastomotic air, or ischemic colitis, WSCE may be recommended to exclude CSAL.
引用
收藏
页码:4130 / 4137
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Staging of colorectal cancer using contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomographic colonography
    Narayanan, Srikala
    Kalra, Naveen
    Bhatia, Anmol
    Wig, Jaidev
    Rana, Surinder
    Bhasin, Deepak
    Vaiphei, Kim
    Khandelwal, Niranjan
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 55 (12) : 660 - 666
  • [32] The value of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in predicting gastric cancer recurrence and metastasis
    Li, Chun-Feng
    Zheng, Jian
    Xue, Ying-Wei
    CANCER BIOMARKERS, 2017, 19 (03) : 327 - 333
  • [33] Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Does Not Provide More Information about Sarcopenia than Unenhanced Computed Tomography in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer
    Zhang, Yan
    Liu, Jiabin
    Li, Fei
    Cao, Feng
    Li, Ang
    CONTRAST MEDIA & MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2021, 2021
  • [34] Non-contrast Computed Tomography is Comparable to Contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography for Aortic Volume Analysis after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Nambi, P.
    Sengupta, R.
    Krajcer, Z.
    Muthupillai, R.
    Strickman, N.
    Cheong, B. Y. C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 41 (04) : 460 - 466
  • [35] Diagnostic value of high-dose contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the postoperative lumbar spine
    Lacoursiere, L
    Langelier, R
    Hebert, M
    CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 1998, 49 (01): : 42 - 45
  • [36] Tumor recurrence criteria for postoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography after surgical treatment of oral cancer and flap repair
    Chikui, T
    Yuasa, K
    Inagaki, M
    Ohishi, M
    Shirasuna, K
    Kanda, S
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 2000, 90 (03): : 369 - 376
  • [37] A conservative screening approach to kidney disease before contrast-enhanced computed tomography in outpatient population
    Fathala, A.
    Almehemeid, S.
    Alkharji, I
    Alrwais, R.
    Benkuddah, R.
    Aljahani, J.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 25 (06) : 2503 - 2510
  • [38] Contrast-enhanced computed tomographic colonography in the follow-up of colorectal cancer patients: a feasibility study
    Laghi, A
    Iannaccone, R
    Bria, E
    Carbone, L
    Trasatti, L
    Piacentini, F
    Lauro, S
    Vecchione, A
    Passariello, R
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (04) : 883 - 889
  • [39] Contrast-enhanced computed tomographic colonography in the follow-up of colorectal cancer patients: a feasibility study
    Andrea Laghi
    Riccardo Iannaccone
    Emilio Bria
    Iacopo Carbone
    Luciana Trasatti
    Francesca Piacentini
    Salvatore Lauro
    Aldo Vecchione
    Roberto Passariello
    European Radiology, 2003, 13 : 883 - 889
  • [40] Acute kidney injury in cirrhotic patients undergoing contrast-enhanced computed tomography
    Filomia, Roberto
    Maimone, Sergio
    Saitta, Carlo
    Visconti, Luca
    Caloggero, Simona
    Bottari, Antonio
    Pitrone, Alessia
    Alibrandi, Angela
    Cacciola, Irene
    Caccamo, Gaia
    Vadala, Domenica
    Gambino, Carmine G.
    Franze, Maria Stella
    Raimondo, Giovanni
    Squadrito, Giovanni
    HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 62 : 359A - 359A