Contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography to evaluate anastomotic integrity before ileostomy closure in postoperative colorectal cancer patients

被引:1
|
作者
Kim, Yeun-Yoon [1 ]
Seo, Nieun [1 ]
Lee, Kang Young [2 ]
Kim, Nam Kyu [2 ]
Lim, Joon Seok [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Severance Hosp, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Severance Hosp, Dept Surg, Coll Med, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
关键词
Ileostomy; Colorectal cancer; Anastomotic leakage; Computed tomography; LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION; RISK-FACTORS; ENEMA PRIOR; LEAKAGE; CT; SURVEILLANCE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-021-03118-4
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To investigate the usefulness of contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CECT) to predict clinically significant anastomotic leakage (CSAL) in patients who received colorectal cancer surgery with diverting ileostomy. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery with diverting ileostomy from January 2014 to May 2018 and postoperative CECT were included. The performance of significant CECT features, identified using multivariable logistic regression, to predict CSAL was calculated. In subgroup analysis, the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCs) were compared between CECT and water-soluble contrast enema (WSCE) using DeLong's method. Results Of 325 patients (median age, 58 years; 213 men), CECT was routinely performed to evaluate cancer status in 307 (94.5%), and CSAL was observed in 28 (8.6%). After multivariable adjustment, anastomotic mural defect (odds ratio [OR] 5.24; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.77-15.51; p = 0.003), perianastomotic air (OR 7.28; 95% CI 1.82-29.17; p = 0.007) and ischemic colitis (OR 3.30; 95% CI 1.13-9.61; p = 0.029) were significantly associated with CSAL. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of significant CECT features were 60.7%, 88.2%, 85.9%, 32.7%, and 96.0%, respectively. In subgroup analysis of 144 patients, the AUROC using significant CECT features (optimal sensitivity/specificity, 50.0%/90.4%) was comparable to that using WSCE (optimal sensitivity/specificity, 12.5%/97.8%) to predict CSAL (0.704 vs. 0.552, p = 0.085). Conclusion CECT performed after colorectal cancer surgery may be useful to assess anastomotic integrity before ileostomy closure, especially to negatively predict CSAL. In the presence of anastomotic mural defect, perianastomotic air, or ischemic colitis, WSCE may be recommended to exclude CSAL.
引用
收藏
页码:4130 / 4137
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The usefulness of contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography for patients with suspected fitz-hugh-curtis syndrome
    Oh, J. H.
    Cho, Y. S.
    You, J. S.
    Chung, H. S.
    Chung, S. P.
    Lee, H. S.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2006, 48 (04) : S89 - S89
  • [22] Serum carcinoembryonic antigen measurement, abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography, and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the detection of colorectal cancer recurrence: a correlative study
    Ozkan, Elgin
    Soydal, Cigdem
    Araz, Mine
    Aras, Gulseren
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2012, 33 (09) : 990 - 994
  • [23] Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Evaluation of Hepatic Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients Before and After Cytotoxic Chemotherapy or Targeted Therapy
    He, Hongying
    Cai, Chunyan
    Charnsangavej, Chusilp
    Theriault, Richard L.
    Green, Marjorie
    Quraishi, Mohammad A.
    Yang, Wei T.
    CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2015, 66 (04): : 356 - 362
  • [24] IOMEPROL VERSUS IOPAMIDOL IN CONTRAST-ENHANCED COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY OF THORACIC AND ABDOMINAL ORGANS
    VALENTINI, AL
    TARTAGLIONE, T
    MONTI, L
    MARANO, P
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1994, 18 : S88 - S92
  • [25] Avoiding Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Scans in Patients With Shellfish Allergies
    Narayan, Anand K.
    Durand, Daniel J.
    Feldman, Leonard S.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2016, 11 (06) : 435 - 437
  • [26] Factors affecting change in renal function after contrast-enhanced computed tomography in cancer patients
    Semeniuk-Wojtas, Aleksandra
    Lubas, Arkadiusz
    Gawin, Aneta
    Malyszko, Maciej
    Baryla, Maksymilian
    Stec, Rafal
    Malyszko, Jolanta
    ONCOLOGY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2023, 19 (01): : 9 - 13
  • [27] Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Renal Cancer and in Comparison With Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography: A Meta-analysis
    Zhang, Fan
    Li, Rui
    Li, Gang
    Jin, Lifang
    Shi, Qiusheng
    Du, Lianfang
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2019, 38 (04) : 903 - 914
  • [28] Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography for Identification of Potential Malignancy in Canine Colorectal Mesenchymal Tumours
    Bourgeois, Alexandria D.
    Skinner, Owen T.
    Karnia, James J.
    Smith, Amanda C.
    Kim, Dae Young
    Gallastegui, Aitor
    Griffin, Maureen A.
    O'Neill, Meaghan
    Wustefeld-Janssens, Brandan G.
    Fontes, Gabrielle S.
    Selmic, Laura E.
    Traverson, Marine
    Souza, Carlos H. de M.
    Bertran, Judith
    Thomsen, Brian
    Vinayak, Arathi
    Mickelson, Megan A.
    VETERINARY AND COMPARATIVE ONCOLOGY, 2025,
  • [29] Comparsion of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography in Lung Cancer Lymph Node Staging
    Jian, Zhang
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 56 (03)
  • [30] Spontaneous Closure of a Carotid-cavernous Fistula after Contrast-enhanced Orbit Computed Tomography
    Kim, Byung Jin
    Park, Hye Yeon
    Shin, Hye Young
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2021, 62 (10): : 1455 - 1458