The dependency of pixel size on calcification reproducibility in digital mammography

被引:1
|
作者
Kuwabara, Takao [1 ]
Iwasaki, Nobuyuki [1 ]
Yamane, Katsutoshi [1 ]
Kojima, Tetsuya [1 ]
Fukushima, Kimitake [1 ]
Agano, Toshitaka [1 ]
机构
[1] Fujifilm Corp, Med Syst Dev Ctr, 798 Miyanodai, Kaisei, Kanagawa 2588538, Japan
关键词
mammography; calcification; pixel size; image simulation; shape recognition;
D O I
10.1117/12.706744
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to determine the relative effect of MTF, DQE, and pixel size on the shape of microcalcifications in mammography. Two original images were obtained by a) scanning the film that accompanies an RMI-156 phantom at a resolution of 25 mu m per pixel, b) creating an image with various shapes on a computer. Simulated images were then obtained by changing MTF, adding noise to simulate DQE effects, and changing the resolution of the original images. These images were visually evaluated to determine the recognition of the shape. In the evaluation of 400 mu m microcalcifications on the RMI-156 phantom, we found that shape recognition is maintained with a pixel size of 50 mu m or less regardless of MTF. However, at resolutions over 50 mu m, recognition was insufficient even when MTF was increased. Adding noise decreased visibility but did not affect shape recognition. The same results were obtained using computer-created shapes. The effect of pixel size on the recognition of the shape of microcalcifications was shown to be greater compared to MTF and DQE. It was also found that increasing MTF does not compensate for information lost because of enlarged pixel size.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effects of pixel/aperture sizes on image properties in digital mammography
    Liu, XM
    Shaw, CC
    Rong, JX
    Whitman, GJ
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2000: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2000, 3977 : 159 - 166
  • [22] Determining air kerma from pixel values in digital mammography
    Toroi, P.
    Nieminen, M. T.
    Tenkanen-Rautakoski, P.
    Varjonen, M.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (12): : 3865 - 3879
  • [23] DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY - ROC STUDIES OF THE EFFECTS OF PIXEL SIZE AND UNSHARP-MASK FILTERING ON THE DETECTION OF SUBTLE MICROCALCIFICATIONS
    CHAN, HP
    VYBORNY, CJ
    MACMAHON, H
    METZ, CE
    DOI, K
    SICKLES, EA
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1987, 22 (07) : 581 - 589
  • [24] Test of a GaAs-based pixel device for digital mammography
    Amendolia, SR
    Bisogni, MG
    Bottigli, U
    Ciocci, MA
    Delogu, P
    Dipasquale, G
    Fantacci, ME
    Maestro, P
    Marzulli, V
    Mikulec, B
    Pernigotti, E
    Rosso, V
    Stefanini, A
    Stumbo, S
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2001, 460 (01): : 50 - 54
  • [25] Contrast enhanced digital mammography - a useful adjuvant to digital mammography in predicting tumour size
    McGuire, A.
    O'Leary, D. P.
    Ryan, M.
    Khan, Z.
    Corrigan, M.
    Redmond, H. P.
    Relihan, N.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 102 : 22 - 23
  • [26] Reproducibility of computer-aided detection marks in digital mammography
    Kim, Seung Ja
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    Cho, Nariya
    Cha, Joo Hee
    Kim, Sun Mi
    Im, Jung-Gi
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2007, 8 (03) : 198 - 205
  • [27] REPRODUCIBILITY OF MAMMOGRAPHY
    EGAN, RL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY RADIUM THERAPY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1963, 90 (02): : 356 - &
  • [28] Calculation of the contrast of the calcification in digital mammography system: Gate validation
    Arefan, Dooman
    Talebpour, Alireza
    Ahmadinejhad, Nasrin
    Asl, Alireza Kamali
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2018, 14 (02) : 335 - 340
  • [29] Accuracy in tumor size measurements: Comparison of digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and synthetic mammography
    Sendur, Halit Nahit
    Cerit, Mahi Nur
    Gultekin, Serap
    Cindil, Emetullah
    Aslan, Aydan Avdan
    Erdal, Zeynep Sezgi
    Gultekin, Isil Imge
    Teke, Furkan
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2021, 69 : 115 - 119
  • [30] Consistency of Lesion Size in Digital Mammography Reply
    Paquelet, Jean R.
    Hendrick, R. Edward
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 195 (03) : W258 - W258