The dependency of pixel size on calcification reproducibility in digital mammography

被引:1
|
作者
Kuwabara, Takao [1 ]
Iwasaki, Nobuyuki [1 ]
Yamane, Katsutoshi [1 ]
Kojima, Tetsuya [1 ]
Fukushima, Kimitake [1 ]
Agano, Toshitaka [1 ]
机构
[1] Fujifilm Corp, Med Syst Dev Ctr, 798 Miyanodai, Kaisei, Kanagawa 2588538, Japan
关键词
mammography; calcification; pixel size; image simulation; shape recognition;
D O I
10.1117/12.706744
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to determine the relative effect of MTF, DQE, and pixel size on the shape of microcalcifications in mammography. Two original images were obtained by a) scanning the film that accompanies an RMI-156 phantom at a resolution of 25 mu m per pixel, b) creating an image with various shapes on a computer. Simulated images were then obtained by changing MTF, adding noise to simulate DQE effects, and changing the resolution of the original images. These images were visually evaluated to determine the recognition of the shape. In the evaluation of 400 mu m microcalcifications on the RMI-156 phantom, we found that shape recognition is maintained with a pixel size of 50 mu m or less regardless of MTF. However, at resolutions over 50 mu m, recognition was insufficient even when MTF was increased. Adding noise decreased visibility but did not affect shape recognition. The same results were obtained using computer-created shapes. The effect of pixel size on the recognition of the shape of microcalcifications was shown to be greater compared to MTF and DQE. It was also found that increasing MTF does not compensate for information lost because of enlarged pixel size.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] High-resolution pixel detectors for second generation digital mammography
    Tümer, TO
    Yin, S
    Cajipe, V
    Flores, H
    Mainprize, J
    Mawdsley, G
    Rowlands, JA
    Yaffe, MJ
    Gordon, EE
    Hamilton, WJ
    Rhiger, D
    Kasap, SO
    Sellin, P
    Shah, KS
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2003, 497 (01): : 21 - 29
  • [32] Reproducibility of Breast Arterial Calcium Mass Quantification Using Digital Mammography
    Molloi, Sabee
    Mehraien, Toufan
    Iribarren, Carlos
    Smith, Christopher
    Ducote, Justin L.
    Feig, Stephen A.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2009, 16 (03) : 275 - 282
  • [33] Quantification of breast arterial calcification using full field digital mammography
    Molloi, Sabee
    Xu, Tong
    Ducote, Justin
    Iribarren, Carlos
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (04) : 1428 - 1439
  • [34] Dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: A phantom study
    Kappadath, SC
    Shaw, C
    Lai, C
    Liu, X
    Whitman, G
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (06) : 1797 - 1797
  • [35] Dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: theory and implementation
    Kappadath, SC
    Shaw, C
    Lai, CJ
    Liu, XM
    Whitman, G
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2004: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2004, 5368 : 751 - 760
  • [36] Quantitative evaluation of dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging
    Kappadath, SC
    Shaw, CC
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2004, 49 (12): : 2563 - 2576
  • [37] Digital mammography detects smaller lesion size and contrast than conventional mammography
    Levy, LD
    Dana, A
    Martin, B
    Meyer, D
    Teman, G
    Benali, K
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 284 - 284
  • [38] Prompting in mammography: Reproducibility
    Tiew, Stephanie
    Astley, Sue
    Dillon, Bernice
    Morris, Jullie
    Boggis, Caroline
    DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5116 : 137 - +
  • [39] REPRODUCIBILITY OF DIGITAL SUBTRACTION FLUOROSCOPIC READINGS FOR CORONARY-ARTERY CALCIFICATION
    TANG, W
    YOUNG, E
    DETRANO, R
    DOHERTY, T
    FRENCH, W
    BRUNDAGE, B
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1994, 29 (02) : 147 - 149
  • [40] Detection and Classification of Calcification on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and 2D Digital Mammography: A Comparison
    Spangler, M.
    Zuley, M.
    Sumkin, J.
    Abrams, G.
    Ganott, M.
    Hakim, C.
    Perrin, R.
    Shah, R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (05)