The dependency of pixel size on calcification reproducibility in digital mammography

被引:1
|
作者
Kuwabara, Takao [1 ]
Iwasaki, Nobuyuki [1 ]
Yamane, Katsutoshi [1 ]
Kojima, Tetsuya [1 ]
Fukushima, Kimitake [1 ]
Agano, Toshitaka [1 ]
机构
[1] Fujifilm Corp, Med Syst Dev Ctr, 798 Miyanodai, Kaisei, Kanagawa 2588538, Japan
关键词
mammography; calcification; pixel size; image simulation; shape recognition;
D O I
10.1117/12.706744
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to determine the relative effect of MTF, DQE, and pixel size on the shape of microcalcifications in mammography. Two original images were obtained by a) scanning the film that accompanies an RMI-156 phantom at a resolution of 25 mu m per pixel, b) creating an image with various shapes on a computer. Simulated images were then obtained by changing MTF, adding noise to simulate DQE effects, and changing the resolution of the original images. These images were visually evaluated to determine the recognition of the shape. In the evaluation of 400 mu m microcalcifications on the RMI-156 phantom, we found that shape recognition is maintained with a pixel size of 50 mu m or less regardless of MTF. However, at resolutions over 50 mu m, recognition was insufficient even when MTF was increased. Adding noise decreased visibility but did not affect shape recognition. The same results were obtained using computer-created shapes. The effect of pixel size on the recognition of the shape of microcalcifications was shown to be greater compared to MTF and DQE. It was also found that increasing MTF does not compensate for information lost because of enlarged pixel size.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of the influence of pixel size on diagnostic accuracy in digital mammography
    Muller, S
    Rick, A
    Priday, K
    Levy, L
    IWDM 2000: 5TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, 2001, : 95 - 101
  • [2] Clinical evaluation of pixel size requirements for digital spot mammography
    De Paredes, ES
    Wilson, JD
    Fatouros, PP
    Stanley, CS
    Muller, CC
    Thunberg, S
    Dwyer, SJ
    IWDM 2000: 5TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, 2001, : 519 - 523
  • [3] Clinical evaluation of pixel size requirements for digital spot mammography
    de Paredes, ESS
    Wilson, JD
    Thunberg, SJ
    Dwyer, SJ
    Stanley, CS
    Muller, C
    RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213P : 151 - 151
  • [4] Detection of simulated microcalcifications in a phantom with digital mammography: Effect of pixel size
    Suryanarayanan, Sankararaman
    Karellas, Andrew
    Vedantham, Srinivasan
    Sechopoulos, Ioannis
    D'Orsi, Carl J.
    RADIOLOGY, 2007, 244 (01) : 130 - 137
  • [5] Shape determination of microcalcifications in simulated digital mammography images with varying pixel size
    Ruschin, M
    Båth, M
    Hemdal, B
    Tingberg, A
    Medical Imaging 2005: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 2005, 5749 : 288 - 299
  • [6] Impact of pixel size for the differentiation of benign and malignant microcalcification clusters in digital mammography
    Levy, LD
    Muller, SL
    Priday, K
    Rick, A
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 : 105 - 105
  • [7] Threshold pixel size for shape determination of microcalcifications in digital mammography:: A pilot study
    Ruschin, M
    Hemdal, B
    Andersson, I
    Börjesson, S
    Håkansson, M
    Båth, M
    Grahn, A
    Tingberg, A
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2005, 114 (1-3) : 415 - 423
  • [8] Semiconductor pixel detectors for digital mammography
    Novelli, M
    Amendolia, SR
    Bisogni, MG
    Boscardin, M
    Dalla Betta, GF
    Delogu, P
    Fantacci, ME
    Quattrocchi, M
    Rosso, V
    Stefanini, A
    Venturelli, L
    Zucca, S
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2003, 509 (1-3): : 283 - 289
  • [9] Can Smaller Pixel Size and Use of Digital Phase Contrast Mammography Improve Observer Performance in Diagnostic Mammography?
    Schmidt, R.
    Nishikawa, R.
    Shimauchi, A.
    Newstead, G.
    Karkani, K.
    Edwards, A.
    Papaioannou, J.
    Makin, S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (05)
  • [10] Comparing the clinical value of spot view mammography with reduced pixel size to monitor zooming by reporting microcalcifications in digital mammography
    Schulz-Wendtland, R.
    Hermann, K.-P.
    Wenkel, E.
    Adamietz, B.
    Lell, M.
    Boehner, C.
    Uder, M.
    Bautz, W. A.
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2007, 179 (05): : 492 - 496